Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2007; 115(9): 584-589
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-981454
Article

© J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG · Stuttgart · New York

German Primary Care Doctors' Awareness of Osteoporosis and Knowledge of National Guidelines

R. Chenot 1 , C. Scheidt-Nave 2 , S. Gabler 3 , M. M. Kochen 1 , W. Himmel 1
  • 1Department of General Practice, University of Göttingen, Germany
  • 2Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA), Mannheim, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

received 18.01.2007 first decision 22.03.2007

accepted 02.05.2007

Publication Date:
18 October 2007 (online)

Abstract

Aims: With the aging of populations in industrialized countries, managing osteoporosis in the primary care setting becomes increasingly important. General practitioners (GPs) are in an ideal position to identify and manage patients who are at an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture. In a cross-sectional survey we studied whether German GPs (1) are aware of osteoporosis as an urgent health problem, (2) felt competent to manage patients with osteoporosis, (3) knew and used the national guideline for osteoporosis treatment and if not, (4) which barriers prevented them from doing so.

Participants and Methods: A representative random sample of German GPs were sent a 30-item standardized questionnaire by mail. Chi-square statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to detect associations between knowledge of guidelines and explanatory variables.

Results: Of 2,194 doctors addressed, 892 (41.1%) answered the questionnaire. The majority of doctors (82.7%) felt competent in osteoporosis management (95% confidence interval: 80.2 - 85.2) and only 11.2% (8.2 - 13.1) did not consider osteoporosis an important problem in their practice. About half (459/892) reported knowing the national osteoporosis guideline well (51.7%; 48.4 - 55.0), whereas 22.6% (19.9 - 25.4) admitted to not being familiar with it at all. Knowledge of the guideline was positively associated with being a female doctor (OR=1.36; 1.01-1.85), having Internet access (OR=1.40, 1.06 - 1.85), seeing institutionalized patients (OR=1.67; 1.03 -2.69), and caring for patients with osteoporosis at a higher frequency (OR=2.60; 1.93 - 3.50). Nearly 43% (39.7 - 46.2) used the guideline in their practice without problems. In free-text fields, GPs reported most frequently that budgetary restrictions preventing the prescription of appropriate medication represented a severe problem for osteoporosis management.

Conclusion: Although most GPs are aware of osteoporosis as an important health problem and felt competent in the management of this disease, only half of the respondents knew and used the national guideline. This may explain deficits in diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis in Germany. Since guideline knowledge and frequency of consultations for osteoporosis strongly correlate, proper dissemination of the guideline may further enhance awareness of, and evidence-based treatment for, osteoporosis.

References

  • 1 Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application. Cary NC: SAS Institute 1999
  • 2 Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsh RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. Hoboken: Wiley 1980
  • 3 Borgström F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C. At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis.  Osteoporos Int. 2006;  17 1459-1471
  • 4 Butzlaff M, Kempkens D, Schnee M, Dieterle WE, Bocken J, Rieger MA. German ambulatory care physicians' perspectives on clinical guidelines-a national survey.  BMC Fam Pract. 2006;  7 47 , doi:10.1186/1471-2296-7-47
  • 5 Eisman J, Clapham S, Kehoe L. Osteoporosis prevalence and levels of treatment in primary care: the Australian BoneCare Study.  J Bone Miner Res. 2004;  19 1969-1975
  • 6 Feely J, McGettigan P, Kelly A. Growth in use of statins after trials is not targeted to most appropriate patients.  Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  67 438-441
  • 7 Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, Greenberg SB, Greisinger AJ. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2006;  9 1043-1051
  • 8 Häussler B, Gothe H, Gol D, Glaeske G, Pientka L, Felsenberg D. Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany-the BoneEVA Study.  Osteoporos Int. 2007;  18 77-84
  • 9 Jaglal SB, McIsaac WJ, Hawker G, Carroll J, Jaakkimainen L, Cadarette SM, Cameron C, Davis D. Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration of the failure of the current guideline implementation process.  Osteoporos Int. 2003;  14 672-676
  • 10 Machin D, Campbell MJ, Fayers PM, Pinol APY. Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies. Oxford: Blackwell 1997
  • 11 McGuirk B, King W, Govind J Lowry J, Bogduk N. Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care.  Spine. 2001;  26 2615-2622
  • 12 National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians . Basic data of health care.  2005;  http://www.kbv.de/publikationen/125.html , (last accessed 2007/06/04)
  • 13 Ouimet M, Landry R, Amara N, Belkhodja O. What factors induce health care decision-makers to use clinical guidelines? Evidence from provincial health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals in Canada.  Soc Sci Med. 2006;  62 964-976
  • 14 Perez-Edo L, Ciria Recasens M, Castelo-Branco C, Orozco Lopez P, Gimeno Marques A, Perez C, Manasanch Dalmau J. Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary care practitioners in Spain.  Osteoporos Int. 2004;  15 252-257
  • 15 Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L. Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;  77 334-338
  • 16 Solomon DH, Brookhart MA, Gandhi TK, Karson A, Gharib S, Orav EJ, Shaykevich S, Licari A, Cabral D, Bates DW. Adherence with osteoporosis practice guidelines: a multilevel analysis of patient, physician, and practice setting characteristics.  Am J Med. 2004;  12 919-924
  • 17 Taylor JC, Sterkel B, Utley M, Shipley M, Newman S, Horton M, Fitz-Clarence H. Opinions and experiences in general practice on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management.  Osteoporos Int. 2001;  12 844-848
  • 18 Werner P. Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes.  Osteoporos Int. 2005;  16 115-127
  • 19 Werner P, Vered I. Management of osteoporosis: a survey of Israeli physicians' knowledge and attitudes.  Isr Med Assoc J. 2000;  2 361-364
  • 20 Werner P, Vered I. The diagnosis of osteoporosis: attitudes and knowledge of Israeli physicians.  Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002;  14 52-59

Correspondence

Dr. R. Chenot

Department of General Practice

University of Göttingen

Humboldtallee 38

37073 Göttingen

Germany

Phone: +49/551 39 26 48

Fax: +49/551 39 95 30

Email: rheiden@gwdg.de

    >