Medically managing obesity: Offering hope or a disincentive to change?
Introduction
Overweight and obese individuals are often managed in primary care as this can be their first port of call for symptom presentation or the location for opportunist management following a routine health check [1], [2], [3]. Research shows, however, that although some interventions in primary care can produce weight loss [4] many patients do not follow the advice they are given and weight loss remains minimal [5]. As a result of the failure to promote weight loss
the primary care management of overweight and obesity has recently shifted from the recommendation of behaviour change alone towards a management of weight-related risk factors in response to two new forms of evidence [1], [2]. Primarily, research has consistently shown that behaviour change interventions may only produce small and unsustainable changes in behaviour and subsequent weight [4], [5]. Second, large scale epidemiological data illustrate that the impact of obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke may be due more to metabolic risk factors rather than weight per se [6]. In line with this, GPs are now being encouraged to address a patient's blood pressure and cholesterol levels through medication as a means to manage their risk factors for disease as well as their body weight per se [1], [2]. This finds reflection in the move towards the medical management of smoking cessation through nicotine replacement therapy, the use of drugs such as Orlistat for weight loss and pharmacological approaches to the treatment of alcohol addiction [7], [8], [9], [10]. This shift in management approach has implications for patient outcomes. For example, by focusing on risk factors the patient may feel that their obesity is being ‘cured’ or at least ‘managed' and therefore requires no further input from themselves. Accordingly, being told that their risk factors have improved may paradoxically encourage a patient to make less effort to change their behaviour and lose weight. Such a response would be in line with research exploring the importance of an internal locus of control for behaviour change [11], the role of self efficacy and perceived behavioural control which are central to most models of behaviour [12] and evidence that a medical model of obesity is linked to poor weight loss and weight loss maintenance [13], [14], [15]. In contrast, however, it is possible that the successful medical management of risk factors may offer an incentive to the patient thereby increasing their motivation for the future. This reflects the notion of a teachable moment and the ways in which reinforcement and encouragement at specific times in a patients’ life can engender hope and subsequent change [13], [16]. To date, however, although doctors continue to medically manage risk factors there remains no evidence as to whether this process is either harmful or of benefit to the patient's motivation to self manage their weight problems in the future.
The present study therefore explored the impact of successful versus failed medical management of obesity risk factors (blood pressure and cholesterol) on patients’ intentions to lose weight and change their diet and activity levels. In addition, the study also explored any associated changes in the patients' beliefs about obesity in terms of their understanding of the condition, its consequences and whether it can be controlled by treatment or the patient themselves drawing upon Leventhal’s Self-Regulatory Model emphasizing components of illness representations [17].
Section snippets
Design
The study used a vignette based questionnaire describing an overweight patient receiving medical management of their obesity-related risk factors (blood pressure and cholesterol) which was either successful (an improvement in risk factors) or failed (no change in risk factors). Dependent variables were behavioural intentions (to change their diet; be more active; lose weight) and beliefs about obesity (treatment control; consequences; personal control; understanding; emotional response).
Participants
Participant demographics
Participant demographics by vignette are shown in Table 1.
The majority of participants were female, White, with a mean age 49 years and mean BMI of 31. About two thirds had attained at least post secondary school/college education and more than half had visited their doctor more than 4 times in the past year. The results showed no differences by vignette for any demographic.
Impact of vignette and body weight on behavioural intentions and beliefs about obesity
The results for behavioural intentions and beliefs about obesity by vignette were analysed by t test and are shown in
Discussion
The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of successful versus failed medical management of obesity on patients’ behavioural intentions and beliefs about obesity. Previous research indicates that a medical model of obesity could be detrimental to weight loss as patients may feel that their condition is uncontrollable by them and learn to rely upon input from others [13], [14], [15]. The results from the present study showed, however, that following the vignette in which the medical
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Ethical approval
NRES Committee London – South East (15/LO/0537).
Competing interests
None.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the staff and patients at Grove Medical Practice, Southampton and Stokewood and Old Anchor Surgeries, Eastleigh.
References (22)
- et al.
Adherence, behaviour change and visualisation: a qualitative study of patient’s experiences of obesity medication
J. Psychosom. Res.
(2006) - et al.
A comparison of GPs and lay people’s beliefs about obesity: coherence between causes and solutions
Patient Educ. Couns.
(2008) - et al.
GPs’ and patients’ models of obesity: whose problem is it anyway?
Patient Educ. Couns.
(2001) - et al.
Doctors use of euphemisms and their impact on patients beliefs about their illness
Patient Educ. Couns.
(2005) - et al.
Obesity services: how best to develop a coherent way forward
Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.)
(2015) Obesity in Primary care: prevention, management and the paradox
BMC Med.
(2014)- et al.
Obesity management by general practitioners: the unavoidable necessity
Aust. J. Primary Health
(2015) Counterweight project team: evaluation of the Counterweight Programme for obesity management in primary care: a starting point for continuous improvement
Br. J. Gen. Pract.
(2008)- NICE, Overweight and obese adults evidence review. 2013. Retrieved from:...
- et al.
Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: a pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1. 8 million participants
Lancet
(2014)
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.
Cited by (7)
The chronically inflamed (obese) horse: Understanding adipose biology
2023, Evidence Based Equine Nutrition: A Practical Approach For ProfessionalsThe Effect of Body-Focused Positive Psychology Interventions on Behavioural Intentions, Body Esteem, and Body Compassion
2023, International Journal of Applied Positive PsychologyThe Interaction Effects of Age and Body Size on Body Appreciation and Health- Related Behaviors
2022, International Journal of Psychological ResearchThe impact of body diversity vs thin-idealistic media messaging on health outcomes: an experimental study
2021, Psychology, Health and Medicine