Medical EducationVocational trainees’ views and experiences regarding the learning and teaching of communication skills in general practice
Introduction
Competent doctor–patient communication is widely accepted as a major factor in effective general practice (GP). This is also reflected in its incorporation into the European definition of General Practice/Family Medicine [1] and its educational consequences as condensed in the EURACT educational agenda [2]. Similarly CanMeds state that being a competent communicator is one of the essential roles that every physician should master [3]. In recent decades, undergraduate curricular reform has resulted in increasing attention being placed on the teaching of communication skills (CS) to undergraduate medical students and the latter's learning of these skills. Despite these efforts, GP vocational trainees are still performing below expected levels on communication assessments. Furthermore, educational steps aimed at improving communication skills during the vocational training period seem to produce variable results [4]. Nonetheless, it should be emphasised that medical educational research has provided abundant evidence that communication skills can be taught and that communication skills training can result in changes that are retained for several years [5]. Congruent with the patient-centred approach to doctor–patient communication, learner-centred teaching methods have been advocated in communication education [6], [7]. Such a learner-centred approach calls for an exploration of the views and experiences of the learners involved. Whereas earlier research addressed the views of undergraduate medical students [8], there is still a lack of research aimed at exploring specific GP vocational trainees’ views on and experiences with communication within clinical consultation and on the educational methods used. This paper seeks to address this gap in GP medical education literature to provide a framework for a better understanding of trainees’ communication skills and to guide future curricular reform aimed at improving the communication skills of general practitioners.
Section snippets
Methods
Qualitative research methods are particularly suited to exploring individuals’ views and experiences [9], [10]. We chose focus group (FG) discussions to obtain a better understanding of trainees’ views since we expected the interactions between participants to yield dimensions of understanding that other methods fail to attain [11], [12]. We organised one try-out and six focus group discussions among second and third (final) year GP vocational trainees in Flanders, the Dutch speaking part of
Results
A total of 31 trainees took part in the six focus groups from which the data are further discussed. In reviewing the transcripts, data saturation occurred with a total of six focus groups. “Saturation” refers to the point at which further data do not yield any additional themes.
Listening to the audio-taped semi-structured telephone interviews, which were used as a way of triangulating our results, did not yield any new themes that had not previously been mentioned in the FG analysis.
The
Discussion
The major findings of this qualitative study relate to the particular nature of GP vocational trainees’ communication skills and training in communication skills. Notwithstanding our attempts to include participants who were not very interested in communication skills, it seems that our participants greatly value communication skills within GP. In contrast to Rees’ findings [8], we hardly noticed any negative attitudes toward communication skills. While it is true that they are often not a
Conflict of interest
We declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the “Interuniversitair Centrum voor Huisartsen Opleiding” (ICHO) (Interuniversity Centre for General Practitioner Training) and by the Department of General Practice, Catholic University of Leuven.
We would like to thank the vocational trainees for taking part in this study, and Elisabeth De Corte for her assistance.
References (30)
- et al.
Medical students’ views and experiences of methods of teaching and learning communication skills
Patient Educ Couns
(2004) Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Lancet
(2001)- et al.
Transfer of communication skills training from workshop to workplace: The impact of clinical supervision
Patient Educ Couns
(2006) - et al.
- Heyrman J, editor. EURACT Educational Agenda. European Academy of Teachers in General Practice EURACT....
- et al.
Educational interventions to improve the communication skills of general practice trainees in the clinical consultation (protocol)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
(2005) - et al.
Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine
(1998) - et al.
The learner-cerntered method of medical education
- et al.
Effectiveness of a learner-centred training programme for primary care physicians in using a patient-centred consultation style
Fam Pract
(2001)
Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality
Qual Saf Health Care
Qualitative research: introducing focus groups
Brit Med J
The focus group guidebook
Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research
Brit Med J
Focus Groups
Int J Qual Health Care
Cited by (15)
Consultation skills training as an element of general practice training in Germany – a qualitative survey
2016, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im GesundheitswesenLearning in context: Identifying gaps in research on the transfer of medical communication skills to the clinical workplace
2013, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Measurement of effectiveness requires assessment of participants’ communication skills. However, residents and clinicians often perceive the assessment of their communication skills as subjective [38,39], claiming that not all factors influencing the communication process are taken into account. Since conducting a consultation or building a relationship cannot be atomized into component skills, it is questionable whether it is acceptable to assess communication using behavioral coding schemes that only measure the frequency of some predefined skills and thus do not (fully) take into consideration the context in which the communication occurs [18].
Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: Omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback
2012, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Yet another way to enhance the ‘utility’ of an assessment is by looking for ways to enhance its educational impact for students. Our prior qualitative research had informed us that students need more feedback after OSCEs [16]. Giving such feedback can thus be expected to enhance the educational impact of the OSCE but will only enhance its ‘utility’ as long as its feasibility and cost are not jeopardized.
Communication skills in young people with schizophrenia
2011, Boletin de AELFAThe medical consultation through the lenses of language and social interaction theory
2020, Advances in Health Sciences Education