Is general practitioner decision making associated with patient socio-economic status?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00063-1Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary exploration into the relationship between decisions made by general practitioners (GPs) and the socio-economic status (SES) of patients. There is a large literature on the association between SES, health state and the use of health services, but relatively little has been published on the association between SES and decisions by clinicians once a patient is in the health system. The associations between GP decision making and the patient's SES, health status, gender and insurance status are examined using logit analysis. Three sets of binary choices are analysed: the decision to follow up; to prescribe; and to perform or to order a diagnostic test. Secondary data on consultations for a check up/examination were used to explore these relationships. The results suggest that SES is associated independently with the decision to test and the decision to prescribe but not with the decision to follow up. Patients of high SES are, ceteris paribus, more likely to be tested and less likely to receive a prescription compared with patients of low SES. Women are more likely to be tested and to receive a prescription than men. These findings have implications for the pursuit of equity as a goal of health services policy.

References (55)

  • A.J. Culyer et al.

    Comment: utilisation as a measure of equity

    J. hlth Econ.

    (1992)
  • G. Mooney et al.

    Reweighing heat: response to Culyer, van Doorslaer and Wagstaff

    J. hlth Econ.

    (1992)
  • A.J. Culyer et al.

    Access, utilisation and equity: a further comment

    J. hlth Econ.

    (1992)
  • G.D. Smith et al.

    Socio-economic differences in mortality in Britain and the United States

    Am. J. publ. Hlth

    (1992)
  • G.D. Smith et al.

    The Black report on socio-economic inequalities in health ten years on

    Br. Med. J.

    (1990)
  • J.M. Eisenberg

    Sociologic influences on decision making by clinicians

    Ann. intern. Med.

    (1979)
  • A. Cartwright et al.

    Social class variations in health care and in the nature of general practice consultations

  • S. Bochner

    Doctor, patients and their cultures

  • D.J.G. Bain

    Doctor-patient communication in general practice

    Med. Educ.

    (1976)
  • A.J. Barsky et al.

    Overview: hyperchondriasis, bodily complaints and somatic styles

    Am. J. Psychiatr.

    (1983)
  • W.C. Cockerham et al.

    Social stratification and self-management of health

    J. Hlth soc. Behav.

    (1986)
  • D. Pendleton et al.

    The communication of medical information in general practice consultations as a function of a patients social class

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (1980)
  • M. Boulton et al.

    Social class and the general practice consultation

    Sociol. Hlth Illness

    (1986)
  • G.R. Wilensky et al.

    The relative importance of physician induced demand in the demand for medical care

    Milbank Memorial Fund Q.

    (1983)
  • R.M. Hartley et al.

    Influence of patient characteristics on test ordering in general practice

    Br. Med. J.

    (1984)
  • K. Fylkesnes et al.

    The Tromso study: factors affecting patient-initiated and provider-initiated use of health care services

    Sociol. Hlth Illness

    (1992)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Mode of birth and social inequalities in health: The effect of maternal education and access to hospital care on cesarean delivery

      2014, Health and Place
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, patients with a lower educational level communicate less effectively with doctors, eliciting less health information, whereas patients with a higher socioeconomic status communicate more actively (Willems et al., 2005). As a consequence this may affect decision making (Scott et al., 1996) and choice of hospital. Research has revealed not only that a patient may be affected negatively by health illiteracy and communications styles but also that many patients have little understanding of health statistics, which is known as “statistical illiteracy” (Gigerenzer et al., 2008).

    • State and self investments in health

      2011, Journal of Health Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Undertreatment with lipid-lowering drugs amongst older people and women has been highlighted by Tonstad et al. (2004) in the Oslo Health Study and by Ma et al. (2005) in the U.S. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Other studies find that doctor's prescription of lipid-lowering drugs is related to the socioeconomic status (SES) of the patient (Scott et al., 1996; Ohlsson et al., 2010). Reid et al. (2002) also suggest that smokers are at a disadvantage for receiving lipid lowering therapy.

    • The effect of socioeconomic status on access to primary care: An audit study

      2013, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      These studies have typically presented physicians with clinical vignettes11,12 or used observational databases and adjusted for confounding factors.13 Far fewer studies have focused on discrimination on the basis of patient socioeconomic status.8,14 Audit studies, a well-established method of testing for discrimination in labour and housing markets,15–17 have been used in the United States to show that Medicaid recipients and patients who are uninsured encounter substantial barriers to care.18–21

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text