Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Involuntary Detention: Comparison of Clinical Practices of Psychiatry Residents and Faculty

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to study if involuntary detention criteria in legal certificates filed by psychiatry residents and faculty psychiatrists are consistent with observations in clinical documentation.

Methods

Eighty-nine involuntarily hospitalized patients were retrospectively selected from medical records; eight patients were excluded due to change in involuntary status or immediate discharge on clinical grounds. Medical certificates filed by the residents and faculty psychiatrists were compared with clinical documentation of the same day for consistency in criteria for detention (substantial risk of harm to self or others and/or inability to care for self).

Results

Of 81 included patients, 38.3 % lacked sufficient documentation of clinical justification for involuntary hospitalization. The rate of inconsistency of documented clinical justification showed a greater trend among psychiatry residents compared to faculty psychiatrists (p = 0.069, not statistically significant).

Conclusions

Inconsistency of documented clinical justification for involuntarily detention was higher among residents compared to faculty. There is a need for structured training and supervision of psychiatry residents as well as updated training for faculty psychiatrists with regard to involuntary detention procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Texas Department of State health Services, t.e., Texas Laws Relating to Mental Health Sec.573.022, Section 574.11, Chapters 573 and 574, 2011.

  2. Testa M, West SG. Civil commitment in the United States. Psychiatry. 2010;7(10):30–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufman AR, Way B. North Carolina resident psychiatrist’s knowledge of the commitment statutes: do they stray from the legal standard in the hypothetical application of involuntary commitment criteria? Psychiatry Q. 2010;81:363–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pirzada Sattar S, Debra Pinals A, Amad Din U, Paul Appelbaum S. To commit or not to commit: the psychiatry resident as a variable in involuntary commitment decisions. Acad Psychiatry. 2006;30:191–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jinger G, Hoop MD. Hidden ethical dilemmas in psychiatric residency training: the psychiatry resident as dual agent. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lidz CW, Mulvey EP, Appelbaum PS, Cleveland S. Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards. Am J Psychiatr. 1989;146(2):176–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Task Force on Guidelines for Involuntary Civil Commitment. National Center for State Courts’ Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment. Ment Phys Disabil Law Report. 1986;10(5):409–514.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Aqeel Hashmi, Howard Rhoades, Monica Grover & Ajay K. Parsaik

  2. Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, USA

    Mujeeb Shad

Authors
  1. Aqeel Hashmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mujeeb Shad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Howard Rhoades
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Monica Grover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ajay K. Parsaik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aqeel Hashmi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashmi, A., Shad, M., Rhoades, H. et al. Involuntary Detention: Comparison of Clinical Practices of Psychiatry Residents and Faculty. Acad Psychiatry 38, 619–622 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0085-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0085-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation