Skip to main content
Log in

Compliance of scored tablet halves produced by Palestinian Pharmaceutical Companies with the new European Pharmacopoeia requirements

  • Research Articles
  • Drug Actions
  • Published:
Archives of Pharmacal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the weight uniformity of commonly divided tablets produced by Palestinian Pharmaceutical Companies and to evaluate the importance of both patient- and formulation-related variables on the splitting results. Eighty-four volunteers were enrolled in this study; their age, gender and occupation were documented in order, and the effect of these variables on the tablet splitting results was evaluated. Each volunteer was asked to divide six scored tablets of each product tested and was given clear instructions on how to conduct the splitting process. The split units were individually weighed and the RSD for each product was calculated as instructed in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur. 5.5). Only one scored tablet product passed the Ph. Eur. test of mass uniformity, while the remaining 13 products failed; this indicates that the splitting of these tablet products is not a reliable means for the provision of accurate doses to patients. Age, gender and occupation of volunteers were not found to be predictive of any variability noted in the splitting results. The only factors that were suspected to be linked to passing the splitting test, as per the European Pharmacopoeia, were the shape, friability and hardness of the tablets. As a result of this study, we believe that the practice of dividing tablets, which should provide therapeutic and economic benefits for the patient, may potentially cause significant problems, especially in drugs with low therapeutic indices. Tablets produced by Palestinian Pharmaceutical Companies should comply with the new Ph. Eur. splitting regulations to reduce this potential for complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, Note for Guidance on Development Pharmaceutics. Web-site EMEA: http://www.emea.eu.int. (1998).

  • APhA Strategic Directions Committee. Tablet splitting: evaluating appropriateness for patients. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., 44,3, 324–325 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biron, C., Licznar, P., Hansel, S., and Schved, J. F., Oral anticoagulant drugs: do not cut tablets in quarters. Thromb. Haemost., 82, 1201 (1999).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Lopez, S. M., Mallet, M. S., and Morse, T., The tablet splitter: barrier to compliance or cost-saving instrument? Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., 52, 2707–2708 (1995).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, M. C., Castle, S. S., and Streetman, D. S., Effect of tablet splitting on serum cholesterol concentrations. Ann. Pharmacother., 36, 205–209 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fawell, N. G., Cookson, T. L., and Scranton, S. S., Relationship between tablet splitting and compliance, drug acquisition cost, and patient acceptance. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., 56, 2542–2545 (1999).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. and Gupta, K., Broken tablets: does the sum of the parts equal the whole? Am. J. Hosp. Pharm., 45, 1498 (1988).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, H. G., Jorgensen, G. H., and Sonnergaard, J. M., Mass uniformity of tablets broken by hand. Pharmeuropa, 7, 298–302 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdemann, J. and Moest, T., Dosierungsgenauigkeit teilbarer tabletten. Realisierung uber die tablettenform. Dtsch. Apoth. Ztg., 134, 27–30 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, J. L. and Nation, R. L., Splitting tablets. Australian Prescriber, 25, 133–135 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, J. T., Gurst, A. H., and Chen, Y., Accuracy of tablet splitting. Pharmacotherapy, 18, 193–197 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodenhuis, N., de Smet P. A. G. M., and Barends, D. M., Patient experiences with the performance of tablet score lines needed for dosing. Pharm. World Sci., 25, 173–176 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. M., Nathan, J. P., and Plakogiannis, F., Weight variability of pharmacist-dispensed split tablets. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., 42, 200–205 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, C., Neue Tablettenform: Exakt Teilbar New tablet form: accurate divisible. Pharm. Ztg., 140, 39–45 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spang, R., Breakability of tablets and film-coated dragees. Pharm. Acta Helv., 57, 99–111 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tablets, European Pharmacopoeia Suppl. 4.1, Council of Europe; European Directorate for the Quality of Medicine, Strasbourg, Monograph 0478 (2002).

  • van Santen, E., Barends, D. M., and Frijlink, H. W., Breaking of scored tablets: a review. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 53, 139–145 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdel Naser Zaid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaid, A.N., Ghosh, A.A. Compliance of scored tablet halves produced by Palestinian Pharmaceutical Companies with the new European Pharmacopoeia requirements. Arch. Pharm. Res. 34, 1183–1189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-011-0717-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-011-0717-8

Key words

Navigation