Skip to main content
Log in

Networks, Social Norms and Knowledge Sub-Networks

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Networks and the World Wide Web seem to provide an answer to efficiently creating and disseminating knowledge resources. Knowledge, however, is ambiguous in character, and contains both explicit (information) and tacit dimensions – the latter being difficult to value as well as to transfer. Participant identity, commitment and behaviour within the network also affect the sharing of knowledge. Hence, existing laws and norms (including property rights) which have been established on the basis of discrete transactions and monetary value-oriented exchange may not be adequate to deal with the whole spectrum of knowledge transfer. A model is needed to address transfer across a large heterogeneous network. We introduce the concept of sub-networks where tacit knowledge resides and argue that considering social norms underlying trust and other informal mechanisms provides a more suitable basis for understanding the exchange of tacit knowledge. Norm establishment is complicated by the fact that values differ across cultures; however, the social norms that underpin sub-networks can sustain knowledge transfer within them. The purpose of this conceptual article is to introduce the concept of sub-networks and to identify the sub-network/network relationship as an area in which it is necessary to look beyond property rights and raise the issue of norms. We believe that an analysis of the role of social norms in knowledge sub-networks and their interaction with global networks points to a key element in understanding networks and any emerging theory of network ethics in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P.S. and S.W. Kwon: 2000, ‘Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’, in E. L.Lesser (ed), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA), pp. 89-115.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y.: 1982, ‘Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets’, Journal of Law and Economics 25(1), 27-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y.: 1997, Economic Analysis of Property Rights, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.: 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life, (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenrieder, I. M.: 2004, Effects of Multiple Network Ties, Knowledge Transfer and Sharing in a Network: The Effects of Multiple Ties. Research Paper, ERIM, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

  • Burt, R.: 1992, Structural Holes, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J.: 2009, ‘Governance and the Common Good’, Journal of Business Ethics 89, 11-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S.: 1969, A Theory of Share Tenancy, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, C.J. and C.C.J.M. Millar: 2006, Knowledge Entanglements, (Palgrave Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H.S. and L. Thompson: 2005, ‘Old Wine in a New Bottle: Impact of Membership Change on Group Creativity,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby: 2002, ‘Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange’. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds). The Adapted Mind, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. and D. Foray: 1997. ‘The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge’, Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 595-622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I.: 2009, ‘Alliances and Networks: Creating Success in the U.K. Fair Trade Market’, Journal of Business Ethics 86, 109-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H.: 1967, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 57, pp. 347-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanara, C., M. A. Lyles, H. K. Steensma, and L. Tihanyi,: 2004, ‘Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in IJVs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance’, Journal of International Business Studies 35(5), 428-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M.: 1993, ‘Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(4), 681-735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R.: 1991, Order without Law, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: 1989, The Cement of Society, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S.R.: 1998, ‘Craft Guilds, Apprenticeship, and Technological Change in Pre-industrial Europe’, The Journal of Economic History 58, 681-713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, J.: 2009, Analyzing the Effect of Attitude in Friendship Networks to Improve Information and Communication Technology Knowledge Sharing: A Gender Approach. Research Paper, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Studies (Feweb), Free University, Amsterdam.

  • Etzioni, A.: 1988, The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics, (The Free Press. New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D.C.: 1984, ‘The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms,’ The Academy of Management Review 9(1), 47-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fray, D.: 2006, Economics of Knowledge, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R. M. (1996) ‘Toward a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm’. Strategic Management Journal 17:109-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R.: 1982, Collective Action, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).

    Google Scholar 

  • He, W., Q. Qiao and K.K. Wei: 2009, ‘Social Relationship and Its Role in Knowledge Management Systems Usage’, Information & Management 46(3), 175-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C.: 1998, ‘Learning and Knowledge Acquisition through International Strategic Alliances’, Academy of Management Executive 12(4), 69-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, D. L., 2004, ‘From Innovation to Social Norm: Bounded Normative Influence’, Journal of Health Communication 9(1), 37-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J.: 1981, ‘A Theory of the Ethnically Homogeneous Middleman Group’, Journal of Legal Studies 10, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C.: 1969, The Elementary Structure of Kinship, (Beacon Press Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T.: 2007, ‘Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital’, Journal of Business Ethics 74, 329-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, C. C. J. M.: 2008, ‘Eve’s Apple has Many Skins: the Human Core of Innovation and Knowledge Transfer’, in C.C.J.M. Millar (ed). Eve’s Apple has Many Skins: Knowledge Transfer, Innovation and the Interaction between University and Industry, (Twente University Press, Enschede).

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, C. C. J. M., C. J. Choi, P. Y. K. Cheng: 2009, ‘Co-Evolution: Law and Institutions in International Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 87, 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.: 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance,. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.: 1965, The Logic of Collective Action, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E.: 1990, Governing the Common: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1957, The Tacit Dimension, (Anchor Day, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1959, The Study of Man (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

  • Posner, R.: 1996, Economic Analysis of Law. (Little, Brown, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz, A. and D. J. Wood: 2008, ‘Information versus Knowledge: Transparency and Social Responsibilities in Wikipedia’, in A. Vaccaro, H. Horta, and P. Madsen (eds.), Transparency, Information and Communication Technology: Social Responsibility and Accountability in Business Education (Philosophy Documentation Center, Charlottesville, VA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R. and B. McEvily: 2003, ‘Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2), 240-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus, T.H. and B. Lamont: 2009, ‘The Double-edged Sword of Cultural Distance in International Acquisitions’, Journal of International Business Studies 40(8), 1298-1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, S. and C. Galunic: 2004, ‘More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness’, Strategic Management Journal 25(6), 541-562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1946, ‘Knowing How and Knowing That’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949/1984, The Concept of Mind (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).

  • Sahlins, M.: 1972, Stone Age Economics, (Aldine Atherton, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, N. and G. Laczniak: 2009, ‘Just Markets from the Perspective of Catholic Social Teaching’, Journal of Business Ethics 89, 29-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.: 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker, J.: 1995, ‘Tacit Knowledge and Models of Innovation’, Industrial and Corporate Change 4, 90-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko. A. and N. Bontis: 2004, ‘Meta-Review of Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Literature: Citation Impact and Research Productivity Rankings’, Knowledge and Process Management 11(3), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M.E.: 1981, Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behaviour, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G.: 1978, The Philosophy of Money, (Routledge, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.C.: 1996, ‘Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal 17(S2), 45-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. and R. Grant.: 1996, ‘Knowledge and the Firm: Overview’, Strategic Management Journal 17(winter special issue), 5–9.

  • Steinmueller, W.E.: 2004, ‘Networked Knowledge and Knowledge Based Economies’, International Journal of Social Sciences 171, 159-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. Y. T.: 2009, ‘Managing Asymmetries in Transferring Tacit Knowledge’, in Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning (Springer, Berlin), pp. 95–109.

  • Vaccaro, A. and P. Madsen.: 2009, ‘ICT and NGOs: Difficulties in Attempting to Be Extremely Transparent’, Ethics & Information Technology 11(3), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla C. J. M. Millar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millar, C.C.J.M., Choi, C.J. Networks, Social Norms and Knowledge Sub-Networks. J Bus Ethics 90 (Suppl 4), 565–574 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0607-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0607-x

Keywords

Navigation