Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Musculoskeletal training: are GP trainees exposed to the right case mix for independent practice?

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Musculoskeletal conditions are common in general practice, but clinicians express poor self confidence in dealing with them. Training in general practice relies on clinical exposure to a range of presentations in order to gain competence. It has been suggested that trainees are exposed to a different case mix from qualified general practices (GPs), due to seeing more minor illness and less chronic disease and that this may be responsible in part for their subsequent lack of confidence. The aims of this study were to analyse the case mix of musculoskeletal conditions encountered by general practice trainees and to compare this to the overall population consulting behaviour. This is a prospective observational study. Thirteen general practices in North East England were recruited. Musculoskeletal disorders encountered by 13 GP trainees (7 junior and 6 senior) were prospectively recorded using a handheld diary. Disorders were classified according to working diagnosis or body region if diagnosis was unclear. Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders comprised 17 % of consultations, and the distribution of diagnoses of these was in proportion to epidemiological studies of MSK disorders in the UK as they present in primary care. Back pain was the most frequent label with 141 (29 %) consultations with a further 43 (9 %) for neck pain. Inflammatory arthritis accounted for the same number 43 (9 %). Individual joint problems were 115 (24 %) with knee being most common. A specific diagnosis was more likely to be applied when symptoms were more distal and less likely when axial. Trainees are exposed to the same spectrum of MSK disorders as are present in the population as a whole. Case mix does not appear to be a significant factor in low confidence levels in dealing with MSK disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Essed GGM, Scherpbier AJJA, Van der Vleuten CPM (2002) The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Acad Med 77(4):332–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Der Zwet J, Hanssen VGA, Zwietering PJ, Muijtjens AMM, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Metsemakers JFM, Scherpbier AJJA (2010) Workplace learning in general practice: supervision, patient mix and independence emerge from the black box once again. Med Teach 32(7):e294–e299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lesmes-Anel J, Robinson G, Moody S (2001) Learning preferences and learning styles: a study of Wessex general practice registrars. Br J Gen Pract 51(468):559–564

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis AP, Bolden KJ (1989) General practitioners and their learning styles. J R Coll Gen Pract 39(322):187–189

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eccles M, Bamford C, Steen N, Russell I (1994) Case mix and content of trainee consultations: findings from the north of England study of standards and performance in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 44(387):437–440

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan L (1989) Tekorten in de huisartsopleiding, [Deficiencies in the curriculum of the vocational training for general practitioners]

  7. De Jong J, Visser MRM, Mohrs J, Wieringa-De Waard M (2011) Opening the black box: The patient mix of GP trainees. Br J Gen Pract 61(591):e650–e657

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jordan K, Clarke AM, Symmons DPM, Fleming D, Porcheret M, Kadam UT, Croft P (2007) Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases. Br J Gen Pract 57(534):7–14

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts C, Adebajo AO, Long S (2002) Improving the quality of care of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41(5):503–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S (2010) The inadequacies of musculoskeletal education. Clin Rheumatol 29(10):1121–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coady DA, Walker DJ, Kay LJ (2004) Teaching medical students musculoskeletal examination skills: identifying barriers to learning and ways of overcoming them. Scand J Rheumatol 33(1):47–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oswald AE, Bell MJ, Snell L, Wiseman J (2008) The current state of musculoskeletal clinical skills teaching for preclerkship medical students. J Rheumatol 35(12):2419–2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy EM, Sheane BJ, Cunnane G (2009) Greater focus on clinical rheumatology is required for training in internal medicine. Clin Rheumatol 28(2):139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Day CS, Yeh AC (2008) Evidence of educational inadequacies in region-specific musculoskeletal medicine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(10):2542–2547

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sirisena D, Begum H, Selvarajah M, Chakravarty K (2011) Musculoskeletal examination—an ignored aspect. Why are we still failing the patients? Clin Rheumatol 30(3):403–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons S, Symmons DPM (2010) The burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Medicine 38(3):126–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P (2010) Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:144

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kenna MA (2005) Otitis media and the new guidelines. J Otolaryngol 34(Suppl 1):S24–S32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Bernsen RMD, Miedema HS, Verhaar JAN, Koes BW (2009) Management decisions in nontraumatic complaints of arm, neck, and shoulder in general practice. Ann Fam Med 7(5):446–454

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Allen E, Nicolaidis C, Helfand M (2005) The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies. J Gen Intern Med 20(1):81–90

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Bokhoven MA, Koch H, van der Weijden T, Weekers-Muyres AHM, Bindels PJE, Grol RPTM, Dinant GJ (2012) The effect of watchful waiting compared to immediate test ordering instructions on general practitioners’ blood test ordering behaviour for patients with unexplained complaints; a randomized clinical trial (ISRCTN55755886). Implement Sci 7(1):29

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ericsson KA (2004) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79 (10 SUPPL.):S70-S81

  23. Hay EM, Thomas E, Paterson SM, Dziedzic K, Croft PR (2003) A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy for the treatment of new episodes of unilateral shoulder pain in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 62(5):394–399

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hurley MV, Walsh NE, Mitchell HL, Pimm TJ, Patel A, Williamson E, Jones RH, Dieppe PA, Reeves BC (2007) Clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain: a cluster randomized trial. Arthritis Care Res 57(7):1211–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by an Arthritis Research Educational fellowship.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethics statement

NHS ethical approval was granted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain Goff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goff, I., Wise, E.M., Coady, D. et al. Musculoskeletal training: are GP trainees exposed to the right case mix for independent practice?. Clin Rheumatol 35, 507–511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2767-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2767-z

Keywords

Navigation