Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients’ perspective

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Modern cancer care is provided in highly specialized structures as certificated centres and comprehensive cancer center, as well as specialized practices. In contrast, the position of the general practitioner (GP) is less well characterised and there is a lack of information about his importance in the care for cancer patients. The aim of our survey was to assess the role of GPs in German cancer care from patients’ perspective.

Methods

In several steps we developed a standardized anonymous questionnaire in cooperation with the German Association of General Practitioners and the Federal Association of German Self-Help Groups. This questionnaire was used in a print and an online version and distributed by the self-help organizations to their members.

Results

Seven hundred and forty participants took part in the survey, 66.5% women and 30.1% men. 71% had visited the GP during cancer therapy and 34.5% discussed decisions concerning diagnostics and therapy with him. The most relevant reasons to visit the GP during cancer therapy were to get a blood test (63.3%), comorbidities (42.7%) and complaints and side effects (38.3%). For the latter, most often a detailed discussion ensued (57%), fooled by a prescription (37.7%). In 63.4% the GP offered support when patients had some questions or worries concerning their cancer. Yet, 17% of the patients reported that the GP did not try to help. 85.5% of the participants thought that it is important that their GP is informed about the therapy on a regular basis. For 77.0%, a simultaneous care provided by the GP is important or very important.

Conclusion

Our survey points to the importance of the GP during cancer therapy from the patient’s point of view. Patients want their GP to take an active part in the cancer therapy. Furthermore, early integration of the GP may also enhance early integration of palliative care and also help family members and caregivers. A strategy to integrate GPs is the establishment of shared care models, in which GPs are supported by specialists and get additional training in cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aabom B, Pfeiffer P (2009) Why are some patients in treatment for advanced cancer reluctant to consult their GP? Scand J Prim Health Care 27(1):58–62. doi:10.1080/02813430802677817

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Adams E, Boulton M, Rose P, Lund S, Richardson A, Wilson S, Watson E (2011) Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 61(585):173–182. doi:10.3399/bjgp11X567108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ansmann L, Nitzsche A, Neumann M (2014) Niedergelassene Hämatologen und Onkologen: Gestresst, aber zumeist zufrieden. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 111(Heft 7):262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H (2006) “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me”—the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer—a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 7:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-7-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baum E, Hummer-Pradier E, Scherer M, Wilm S, Simmenroth A, Niebling W, Eras J (2002a) Fachdefinition. http://www.degam.de/fachdefinition.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Baum E, Hummer-Pradier E, Scherer M, Wilm S, Simmenroth A, Niebling W, Eras J (2002b) Leitlinien. http://www.degam.de/leitlinien.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Ben-Ami E, Merom H, Sikron F, Livneh J, Sadetzki S, Wolf I (2014) Involvement of the family physician in the care of chemotherapy-treated patients with cancer: patients’ perspectives. J Oncol Pract 10:298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergholdt SH, Hansen DG, Larsen PV, Kragstrup J, Sondergaard J (2013) A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients’ satisfaction with their general practitioners. BMJ Open. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002726

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braun TC, Hagen NA, Smith C, Summers N (2003) Oncologists and family physicians: Using a standardisized letter to improve communication. Can Fam Physician 49:882–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan CM, Campbell K (2016) General practitioners’ ‘lived experience’ of assessing psychological distress in cancer patients: an exploratory qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 25(3):391–401. doi:10.1111/ecc.12351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cassisi S (2014) forsa-Studie: 94 Prozent der Deutschen wünschen sich den Hausarzt als Koordinator im Zentrum der. http://www.hausaerzteverband.de/cms/News-im-Detail.226.0.html?&no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=935. Accessed 25 Nov 2016

  • Christen S, Vetsch J, Mader L, Dehler S, Korol D, Kuehni C, Rueegg CS, Michel G (2016) Preferences for the organization of long-term follow-up in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 24(8):3425–3436. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3157-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann DM (2016) Übersicht Hämatologie und Onkologie. http://www.onkoscout.de. Accessed 4 Feb 2016

  • Coindard G, Barriere J, Vega A, Patrikidou A, Saldanha-Gomes C, Arnould P, Combessie P, Ourabah R (2016) What role does the general practitioner in France play among cancer patients during the initial treatment phase with intravenous chemotherapy? A qualitative study. Eur J Gen Pract 22(2):96–102. doi:10.3109/13814788.2015.1126821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emery JD, Shaw K, Williams B, Mazza D, Fallon-Ferguson J, Varlow M, Trevena LJ (2014) The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11(1):38–48. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fidjeland HL, Brekke M, Vistad I (2015) General practitioners’ attitudes toward follow-up after cancer treatment: A cross-sectional questionnaire study. Scand J Prim Health Care:1–10. doi:10.3109/02813432.2015.1118836

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Follmann M (2016) Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Home.2.0.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2016

  • Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, Verma S, Dent S, Sawka C, Pritchard KI, Ginsburg D, Wood M, Whelan T (2006) Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol 24(6):848–855. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guassora AD, Jarlbaek L, Thorsen T (2015) Preparing general practitioners to receive cancer patients following treatment in secondary care: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 15:202. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0856-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halkett GKB, Jiwa M, Lobb EA (2015) Patients’ perspectives on the role of their general practitioner after receiving an advanced cancer diagnosis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 24(5):662–672. doi:10.1111/ecc.12224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall SJ, Samuel LM, Murchie P (2011) Toward shared care for people with cancer: developing the model with patients and GPs. Fam Pract 28(5):554–564. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmr012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall S, Gray N, Browne S, Ziebland S, Campbell NC (2012) A qualitative exploration of the role of primary care in supporting colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20(12):3071–3078. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1434-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiwa M, Meng X, O’Shea C et al. (2015) How do general practitioners manage patients with cancer symptoms?: A video-vignette study. BMJ Open. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008525

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen M-L, Holtedahl KA, Rudebeck CE (2010) A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care. Scand J Prim Health Care 28(4):249–255. doi:10.3109/02813432.2010.526792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CE, Lizama N, Garg N, Ghosh M, Emery J, Saunders C (2014) Australian general practitioners’ preferences for managing the care of people diagnosed with cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 10(2):8. doi:10.1111/ajco.12047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung B, Stoll C, Feick G, Prott F, Zell J, Rudolph I, Huebner J (2016) Endocrine therapy in prostate cancer patients: Patients’ report on communication and supportive care and its association with adherence; Prostate cancer patients’ report on communication about endocrine therapy and its association with adherence. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142(2):465–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaatsch P, Spix C, Katalinic A, Hentschel S, Luttmann S et al (2015) Krebs in Deutschland 2011/ 2012. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes

  • Kämmerle A (2016) oncoMAP. http://www.oncomap.de/index.php

  • Kornblith AB, Herr HW, M.D., Ofman US, Sher HI, Holland JC (1994) Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: the value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer 73(11):2791–2802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RA, Neal RD, Williams NH, France B, Hendry M, Russell D, Hughes DA, Russell I, Stuart NSA, Weller D, Wilkinson C (2009) Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 59(564):47. doi:10.3399/bjgp09X453567

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom LH, Johnsen AT, Ross L, Petersen MA, Groenvold M (2011) Cross-sectorial cooperation and supportive care in general practice: cancer patients’ experiences. Fam Pract 28(5):532–540. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmr011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery FU, Wenker M, Kaplan M, Johna S, Reinhardt K, Bartmann F, Bodendieck E, Clever U, Crusius A, Gitter H, Heinemann-Meerz S, Henke R, Jonitz G, Knoblauch zu Hatzbach, Gottfried von, Lundershausen E, Matheis G, Mischo J, Windhorst T, Wolter U (2013) Abbildungen und Tabellen zur Ärztestatistik der Bundesärztekammer. http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Stat13AbbTab.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016

  • Montgomery FU, Wenker M, Kaplan M, Johna S, Reinhardt K, Bartmann F, Bodendieck E, Clever U, Crusius A, Gitter H, Heinemann-Meerz S, Henke R, Jonitz G, Knoblauch zu Hatzbach, Gottfried von, Lundershausen E, Matheis G, Mischo J, Windhorst T, Wolter U (2015) (Muster-)Weiterbildungsordnung 2003

  • Ngune I, Jiwa M, McManus A, Parsons R, Pagey G, Hodder R (2015) Do patients treated for colorectal cancer benefit from general practitioner support? A video vignette study. J Med Internet Res 17(11):e249. doi:10.2196/jmir.4942

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Northouse LL, Mood D, Templin T, Mellon S, George T (2000) Couples’ patterns of adjustment to colon cancer. Soc Sci Med 50(2):271–284. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00281-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renovanz M, Keric N, Richter C, Gutenberg A, Giese A (2015) Patient-centered care. Improvement of communication between university medical centers and general practitioners for patients in neuro-oncology (Patientenzentrierte Versorgung. Verbesserung der Kommunikation zwischen Universitatsklinik und Hausarzten bei neuroonkologischen Patienten). Nervenarzt 86(12):1555–1560. doi:10.1007/s00115-015-4473-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda C, Bock GH de, van der Veen, Willem Jan, Lindeman A, Jansen L, van der Meer K (2012) Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer 20(4):705–714. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1133-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, Dommett R, Earle C, Emery J, Fahey T, Grassi L, Grunfeld E, Gupta S, Hamilton W, Hiom S, Hunter D, Lyratzopoulos G, Macleod U, Mason R, Mitchell G, Neal RD, Peake M, Roland M, Seifert B, Sisler J, Sussman J, Taplin S, Vedsted P, Voruganti T, Walter F, Wardle J, Watson E, Weller D, Wender R, Whelan J, Whitlock J, Wilkinson C, Wit N de, Zimmermann C (2015) The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol 16(12):1231–1272. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00205-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz S, Kratz-Albers K, Engel E, Heymanns J, Illmer T, Knauf W, Eckart MJ, Mosthaf F-A (2016) Schwerpunktpraxen. http://www.bnho.de/schwerpunktpraxen.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2016

  • Sharpe L, Butow P, Smith C, McConnell D, Clarke S (2005) The relationship between available support, unmet needs and caregiver burden in patients with advanced cancer and their carers. Psychooncology 14(2):102–114. doi:10.1002/pon.825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon AE, Thompson MR, Flashman K, Wardle J (2009) Disease stage and psychosocial outcomes in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 11(1):19–25. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01501.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sisler JJ, Belle Brown J, Stewart M (2004) Family physicians` roles in cancer care: Survey of patients on a provincial cancer registry. Can Fam Physician 50:889–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollie A, Helsper CW, Ader RJM, Ausems, M G E M, van der Wouden, J C, Numans ME (2016) Primary care management of women with breast cancer-related concerns-a dynamic cohort study using a network database. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). doi:10.1111/ecc.12526

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter FM, Usher-Smith JA, Yadlapalli S, Watson E (2015) Caring for people living with, and beyond, cancer: an online survey of GPs in England. Br J Gen Pract 65(640):8. doi:10.3399/bjgp15X687409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind J, Duineveld LA, van der Heijden, R P, van Asselt KM, Bemelman WA, van Weert HC (2013) Follow-up after colon cancer treatment in the Netherlands; a survey of patients, GPs, and colorectal surgeons. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(8):837–843. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.04.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wuensch P, Hahne A, Haidinger R, Meißler K, Tenter B, Stoll C, Senf B, Huebner J (2015) Discontinuation and non-adherence to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: Is lack of communication the decisive factor? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 141(1):55–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Federal Association of Self-Help Groups “Haus der Krebs-Selbsthilfe—Bundesverband e.V” and all patients who took time with the questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Huebner.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Conflict of interest

S. Walter has worked as coordinator at the “Haus der Krebs-Selbsthilfe—Bundesverband e.V.”. J. Fessler is a leading member of the IHF. The other authors declare no concflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Due to the anonymity, ethical approval according to the rules of the Ethical committee of the J.W. Goethe University was not required.

Informed consent

Due to the anonymity no informed consent was obtained from the individual participant. Yet, by participating in the survey, the individuals agreed to the scientific evaluation of the answers.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lang, V., Walter, S., Fessler, J. et al. The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients’ perspective. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 143, 895–904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2343-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2343-4

Keywords

Navigation