Skip to main content
Log in

Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To describe internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits and to examine the relationship between fulfillment of expectations for care and visit satisfaction.

Design: Survey of patients and their physicians.

Setting: The internal medicine practice of faculty and housestaff at a large academic center in Southern California.

Patients: 396 patients aged 18 to 65 years were approached in the clinic waiting room prior to their scheduled visits; 337 (85% ) agreed to participate and 304 (77%) turned in completed questionnaires. Postvisit physician surveys were received in 88% of the cases.

Main measurements: The patients’ previsit reports of the elements of care they thought necessary for their physicians to provide; the patients’ and physicians’ postvisit reports of the elements of care actually provided; and the patients’ satisfaction with care.

Results: Among 28 specific elements of care, seven were considered necessary by a majority of the patients (examination of the eyes/ears/nose/throat, lungs, heart, and abdomen; blood testing; prognostic counseling; and discussion of patients’ own ideas about management). A higher number of elements of care were thought necessary by patients who were nonwhite and had not completed college. Up to 38% of the patients reported not receiving elements of care they had considered necessary; specific agreement between physicians and patients about care not received ranged from 63% to 100%. Not receiving certain “necessary” elements of care was associated with lower visit satisfaction.

Conclusion: Internal medicine patients at the center studied had specific expectations for the content of their physician visits. However, they routinely failed to receive some of the items they thought necessary. Unless patients’ expectations are carefully elicited and dealt with, the physician-patient relationship may be adversely affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Sasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32:553–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lehrman CE, Smith DG, Caputo C. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:506–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJL. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss BD, Sent JH. Patient satisfaction survey instrument for use in health maintenance organizations. Med Care. 1990;28:434–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenberg JM. Physician utilization: the state of research about physicians’ practice patterns. Med Care. 1985;23:461–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Woolf SH, Kamerow DB. Testing for uncommon conditions: the heroic search for positive test results. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2451–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Frank A. Clinician/patient relations II. Conflict and negotiation. In: Lazare A (ed). Outpatient Psychiatry: Diagnosis and Treatment. Second edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989; 137–52.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Uhlmann RF, Inui TS, Carter WB. Patient requests and expectations: definitions and clinical applications. Med Care. 1984;22:681–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care. 1989;27:1027–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown JB, Adams ME. Patients as reliable reporters of medical care process. Recall of ambulatory encounter events. Med Care. 1992;30:400–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, et al. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1992;267:1624–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Health prescriptions, energy/fatigue, and health distress measures. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr (eds). Measuring Functioning and Well Being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE Jr, Hays RD. Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:393–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hosner DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Spiro HM. Delayed diagnosis of disease. JAMA. 1985;253:2258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uhlmann RF, Carter WB, Inui TS. Fulfillment of patient requests in a general medicine clinic. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:257–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Deyo RA, Diehl AK, Rosenthal M. Reducing roentgenography use: can patient expectations be altered? Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:141–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitzgerald FT. Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review. West J Med. 1990;152:377–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parker SC, Kroboth FJ. Practical problems of conducting patient satisfaction surveys. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:430–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by grants from the UCLA Academic Senate and the UCLA Center for Educational Development and Research.

About this article

Cite this article

Kravitz, R.L., Cope, D.W., Bhrany, V. et al. Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. J Gen Intern Med 9, 75–81 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600205

Key words

Navigation