Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 33, Issue 4, October 2001, Pages 300-304
Preventive Medicine

Regular Article
Assessment of Coronary Risk in General Practice in Relation to the Use of Guidelines: A Survey in Denmark

https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0887Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. There is a considerable gap between recommended and actually conducted preventive cardiology in general practice. The effect of guidelines is not fully evaluated.

Methods. A questionnaire containing 10 questions on preventive cardiology, including the use of clinical guidelines, together with four case stories for cardiovascular risk estimation was mailed to 205 general practitioners (GPs).

Results. Response rate was 81%. Twenty-five percent of the GPs had consultations in preventive cardiology at least once a day and 60% of the GPs thought lifestyle intervention had significant effect on cardiovascular risk. Approximately two-thirds of the GPs were regular users of national guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease. While the majority of GPs correctly assigned a patient with multiple risk factors to the high-risk category there was a much larger variation in risk estimations if fewer risk factors were present. GPs who reported use of guidelines overestimated coronary risk twice as frequently as nonusers of guidelines.

Conclusion. Preventive cardiology in general practice is common and the effect of lifestyle intervention is well accepted. Poor discrimination between high- and low-risk patients may, however, lead to suboptimal preventive care. The use of guidelines does not seem to improve risk estimation and further dissemination of better tools for risk estimation is needed.

References (18)

  • R Grol et al.

    Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine

    Joint Comm J Qual Improve

    (1999)
  • JM Grimshaw et al.

    Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • K Pyorala et al.

    Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension

    Eur Heart J

    (1994)
  • I Hetlevik et al.

    Fifteen years with clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension—still discrepancies between intentions and practice

    Scand J Prim Health Care

    (1997)
  • CL Williams et al.

    Preventive cardiology in primary care

    Atherosclerosis

    (1994)
  • I Hetlevik et al.

    Treatment of diabetes mellitus—physicians' adherence to clinical guidelines in Norway

    Scand J Prim Health Care

    (1997)
  • Eur Heart J

    (1997)
  • E Battegay et al.

    Risk factor control and perceptions of risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease

    Blood Press Suppl

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (10)

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

To whom reprint requests should be addressed. Fax: +45 43 23 39 77. E-mail: [email protected].

View full text