Table 3. Anorectal chlamydia and association with different variables
VariablesnRectal CT(%)Univariate analysisOR (95 %CI)P valueMultivariate analysisOR (95% CI)P value
Standard indication for rectal testing208(11.1)0.54 (0.32 to 0.92)0.023*
Experimental indication for rectal testing406(14.8)0.76 (0.41 to 1.42)0.40
Anal symptoms98(12.2)0.72 (0.37 to 1.39)0.35
Anal sex138(10.9)0.59 (0.32 to 1.07)0.10
Anal sex without penetration230(12.6)0.67 (0.41 to 1.12)0.13
Anal sex with penetration103(7.8)0.40 (0.19 to 0.86)0.020*0.64 (0.28 to 1.47)0.29
Anal contact with fingers185(9.2)0.43 (0.24 to 0.76)0.003*0.58 (0.31 to 1.11)0.10
Anal contact with toys34(5.9)0.33 (0.08 to 1.42)0.14
Oral contact with genitals352(15.6)1.09 (0.62 to 1.92)0.89
Oral contact with anus91(7.7)0.40 (0.18 to 0.91)0.024*0.69 (0.29 to 1.66)0.41
Age, yearsa
 ≤21104(30.8)
 22–28220(14.5)0.38 (0.22 to 0.67)0.001*0.40 (0.23 to 0.71)0.002*
 >28163(6.7)0.16 (0.08 to 0.34)<0.001*0.20 (0.09 to 0.41)<0.001*
  • aAge ≤21 years was the reference category. n is the total number positive for the variable, excluding 10 women without a rectal CT test. The rectal CT positive (%) was calculated by excluding women with a missing answer (0–5 per question). Women answering 'don’t know' were added to the 'no' category when calculating odds ratios and Fisher’s exact P values. Significant P values ≤0.05 are indicated by asterisk (*). Only possible risk-factor variables (below the double line) were analysed with logistic regression if significantly associated with rectal CT in the univariate analysis. CT = Chlamydia trachomatis