|
Review
|
Test-ordering outcome(s) |
Process changes (including computer systems) |
Guidelines and/or protocols
|
Education
|
Audit and feedback
|
Financial incentives
|
| Solomon et al 199814
| Reduction in test-ordering volumeReduction in test expenditure | x | x | x | x | x |
| Main et al 201015
| Changes in test-ordering volume‘Appropriateness’ of testing | x | | | | |
| Smellie 201216
| Reduction in test-ordering volumeReduction in test expenditure‘Appropriateness’ of testing | x | x | x | x | x |
| Cadogan et al 201517
| Reduction in test-ordering volume | x | x | x | x | |
| Kobewka et al 201518
| Reduction in test-ordering volume | x | | x | x | x |
| Thomas et al 201519
| Reduction in test-ordering volume | x | x | | x | |
| Thomas et al 201620
| Change in test-ordering volume | x | | x | x | |
| Zhelev et al 201621
| Reduction in test-ordering volumeChanges in test expenditure‘Appropriateness’ of testingChanges in testing patterns | x | x | x | x | x |
| Delvaux et al 201722
| ‘Appropriateness’ of testingChanges in test expenditureClinical outcomes | x | | | | |
| Maillet et al 201823
| Changes in test ordering‘Appropriateness’ of testingWorkload | x | | | | |