Table 4. Evaluation of lipid-lowering therapy
High LDL-C population (LDL-C ≥5.0 mmol/l),n = 236, n %Hypercholesterolaemia without potential secondary cause (subgroup),n = 115, n %
Patients with CVD diagnoses
Treatment target LDL-C > 1.8 mmol/ l
Total number of patients68 (28.8)34 (29.6)
 Patients receiving statins51 (75.0)26 (76.5)
 Other lipid-lowering therapy2 (2.9)0 (0.0)
 Maximum dosage of statins28 (54.9)15 (57.7)
 Patients reaching treatment targeta 3 (4.4)2 (5.9)
LDL-C mean mmol/l (IQR)
Maximum registered5.16 (4.90–5.60)4.94 (5.00–5.40)
Adjusted pre-treatment6.36 (5.36–6.73)6.51 (5.30–7.18)
Latest follow-up3.31 (2.50–4.10)3.44 (2.60–4.20)
Patients without CVD diagnoses
Treatment target – LDL-C > 2.6 mmol/ l
Total number of patients168 (71.2)81 (70.4)
 Patients receiving statins67 (39.9)22 (27.2)
 Other lipid-lowering therapy2 (1.2)0 (0.0)
  Maximum dosage of statins
  Overall36 (53.7)15 (68.2)
   Possible FH28 (77.8)10 (66.7)
   Probable FH3 (8.3)1 (6.7)
   Definite FH5 (13.9)4 (26.7)
Patients reaching treatment target
 Overall22 (13.1)6 (7.4)
  Possible FH22 (100)6 (100)
  Probable FH0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
  Definite FH0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
  • Subgroup has been derived from the high LDL-C population. aTreatment target as defined in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines for management of dyslipidaemia.16 CVD = cardiovascular disease. FH = familial hypercholesteroleamia. LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.