Table 5. GPs reporting respective reasons for using clinical prediction rules, N = 401
2014 survey, n (%)2019 survey, n (%)
Cardiovascular disease riskStroke and venous thromboembolismCardiovascular disease riskStroke and venous thromboembolism
Use clinical prediction rule 395 (98.5)328 (81.8)399 (99.5)398 (99.3)
 To aid diagnosis143 (35.7)219 (54.6)145 (36.2)273 (68.1)
 To assess disease severity191 (47.6)142 (35.4)163 (40.6)141 (35.2)
 To guide therapy336 (83.8)188 (46.9)363 (90.5)278 (69.3)
 To guide referral89 (22.2)218 (54.4)95 (23.7)284 (70.8)
 To comply with clinical guidelines or Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)267 (66.6)106 (26.4)253 (63.1)220 (54.9)
 To inform or educate patients220 (54.9)75 (18.7)220 (54.9)137 (34.2)
 Automatically generated by practice software106 (26.4)19 (4.7)67 (16.7)52 (13.0)
 Other1 (0.2)3 (0.7)2 (0.5)3 (0.7)
Do not use clinical prediction rule 6 (1.5)73 (18.2)2 (0.5)3 (0.7)