| 1. Familiarising with data | Reading three transcripts of different subgroups (HS, MA, HV, VvV, SdV) | Individual initial list of ideas for coding |
| 2. Generating initial codes | a. Jointly going through transcripts of three focus groups, focusing on discussing everyone’s initial ideas of codes and arriving at a corresponding idea (HS, MA, HV, VvV, SdV) | Initial codebook with definitions of the codes |
| b. Coding of the remaining data by HS, reviewed transcript by one of the other researchers (MA, HV, VvV, SdV). New codes were defined and cross-checked by the whole team before inclusion in the codebook | Final codebook |
| c. Peer debriefing, looking back on the process and cooperation, and sharing the overall impression of the data (HS, MA, HV, VvV, SdV) | Shared overall view across the data |
| 3. Searching for themes | a. Developing themes using mind mapping (HS and MA) | Initial concept of themes |
| b. Discussion of overarching themes (HS, MA, HV, VvV, SdV) | Concept of themes |
| 4. Reviewing themes | Discussion of the themes with the authors of the article (HS, MA, HV, VvV, DJ, MB) | Completion of the thematic map |
| 5. Defining and naming themes | Writing down the essence of the themes by HS, reviewed by authors (MA, DJ, HV, VvV, MB) | Completion definition of themes; concept of result paragraph of article |
| 6. Producing the report | Rewriting the results in several stages (HS), always commented by the other authors (MA, DJ, HV, VvV, NS, MB). During this process, a synthesis was formulated and discussed with the authors (MA, DJ, HV, VvV, NS, MB) | Finalised text of the results section |