<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cohidon, Christine</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cachou de Camaret, Adeline</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Senn, Nicolas</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wild, Pascal</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Well-being at work among general practitioners working in multidisciplinary primary care teams: a cross sectional study</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BJGP Open</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025-07-03 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><elocation-id><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BJGPO.2024.0201</style></elocation-id><doi><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0201</style></doi><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"></style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"></style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Background Transforming primary care (PC) through the development of multidisciplinary teams can represent a challenge in terms of occupational well-being.Aim This study aimed to investigate associations between occupational stress, job satisfaction among general practitioners (GPs) and the professional composition of PC teams.Desing and setting We conducted a secondary analysis of the data from 11 Western countries that participated in the 2019 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians (N = 13,200).Method PC practice types (N=5) were defined in a previous study, based on their composition of healthcare professionals: the Traditional, Multidisciplinary, Nurse-centred, Psychologist-centred and Physiotherapist-centred models. Using ordered logistic regression analysis, we assessed associations between the five practice models and two GP-reported indicators of well-being at work: job satisfaction and occupational stress.Results Working in multidisciplinary teams, when compared to traditional (GP-centred) practice, was associated with higher occupational well-being, both through lower occupational stress (OR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.68–0.87]) and greater job satisfaction (OR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.26–1.62]). This positive association was also observed in psychologist-centred practices (OR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.71–0.93] for occupational stress and OR = 1.24, 95% CI [1.09–1.42] for job satisfaction). Working in nurse-centred practices was associated with greater satisfaction but only in the smallest practices (OR = 1.59, 95% CI [1.14–2.22]) with &lt;1.4 full-time equivalent GPs.Conclusion Positive associations between multidisciplinary PC teams and occupational well-being are important results for the future of healthcare systems in Western countries, providing interesting avenues for improvements for healthcare professionals and policy-makers.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>