RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Increasing engagement with liver disease management across the UK: a follow-up cross-sectional survey
JF BJGP Open
JO BJGP Open
FD Royal College of General Practitioners
SP BJGPO.2024.0142
DO 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0142
VO 9
IS 1
A1 Jarvis, Helen
A1 Berry, Charlotte
A1 Worsfold, Jonathan
A1 Hebditch, Vanessa
A1 Ryder, Stephen
YR 2025
UL http://bjgpopen.org/content/9/1/BJGPO.2024.0142.abstract
AB Background Liver disease is an increasing cause of premature mortality. Early detection of liver disease in primary care gives opportunity to intervene and change outcomes. Engagement in liver disease care by NHS bodies responsible for primary care pathway development could drive improvements. The formation of integrated care systems (ICS) in England provides an opportunity to reassess engagement with liver disease nationally.Aim To update the level of engagement with community chronic liver disease management among ICSs and health authorities across the UK.Design & setting A cross-sectional follow-up survey to ICS and UK health boards.Method Questions used for a previous survey in 2020 were adapted and sent electronically to NHS bodies responsible for health care across the UK, using a freedom of information request. Quantitative analysis was undertaken using Microsoft Excel.Results There were 67 responses from 68 possible ICS and health board areas, representing 99% UK coverage. Twenty-seven per cent had a named individual responsible for liver disease. Monitoring of local liver disease health statistics happened in 34% of all UK areas. Comprehensive care pathways were available in n = 24/67 (36%) of areas, an increase from 26% in the 2020 survey. Areas with no liver pathways in place fell from 58% to 36% between the two surveys. Regional variations persist, with Wales and Scotland moving towards comprehensive coverage. Almost double the number of areas were making use of transient elastography within community pathways of care, up from 25% to 46%.Conclusion The results of this re-survey highlight improvements, but emphasise the need to build on regional success to further reduce inequality in care commissioning.