PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jung, Paul
AU  - Bleidorn, Jutta
AU  - Doepfmer, Susanne
AU  - Heintze, Christoph
AU  - Krause, Markus
AU  - Kuempel, Lisa
AU  - Kuschick, Doreen
AU  - Lehmann, Lena-Sophie
AU  - Rost, Liliana
AU  - Toutaoui, Kahina J
AU  - Wolf, Florian
TI  - Evaluation of utilization and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: qualitative interviews with general practitioners from Germany
AID  - 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0076
DP  - 2024 Sep 20
TA  - BJGP Open
PG  - BJGPO.2024.0076
4099  - http://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2024/09/19/BJGPO.2024.0076.short
4100  - http://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2024/09/19/BJGPO.2024.0076.full
AB  - Background The use and advantages of point-of-care tests (POCTs) for C-reactive protein (CRP) in general practice, especially for upper respiratory tract infections (uRTIs), have been studied extensively. However, there is limited knowledge about test indications, prerequisites, and integration of these tests into everyday practice.Aim This study aims to investigate the attitudes and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany regarding the use of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs. The study places special emphasis on implementation in routine care, including testing procedures, feasibility, opportunities and barriers for specific consultation scenarios, as well as test indications and their impact on GP-patient communication.Design & setting Qualitative interview study with 10 GPs (May/2023 to Aug/2023)Method Ten German GPs who participated in an observational study on CRP-POCT use in general practices were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Audio recordings were transcribed and content analysis was performed.Results Interviewed GPs stated that CRP-POCTs offer several advantages for various treatment cases. They improve diagnostic confidence and certainty of GPs’ therapeutic decisions, and offer a broad spectrum of indications and application scenarios. Additionally, they have a positive impact on GP-patient communication, and their ease of use enables rapid implementation into existing workflows. On the other hand, CRP-POCT increase the time required for test performance and patient consultation.Conclusion Due to the numerous benefits of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs, interviewed GPs have a favourable attitude towards their regular integration into everyday practice. Implementation barriers include increased time and personnel expenses for testing and inadequate reimbursement by German statutory health insurance.