RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Maintaining face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal qualitative investigation in UK primary care
JF BJGP Open
JO BJGP Open
FD Royal College of General Practitioners
SP BJGPO.2021.0036
DO 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0036
A1 Andrew Turner
A1 Anne Scott
A1 Jeremy Horwood
A1 Chris Salisbury
A1 Rachel Denholm
A1 Lauren J Scott
A1 Geeta Iyer
A1 John MacLeod
A1 Mairead Murphy
YR 2021
UL http://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2021/07/06/BJGPO.2021.0036.abstract
AB Background In March 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic required a rapid reconfiguration of UK general practice to minimise face-to-face contact with patients to reduce infection risk. However, some face-to-face contact remained necessary and practices needed to ensure such contact could continue safely.Aim To examine how practices determined when face-to-face contact was necessary and how face-to-face consultations were reconfigured to reduce COVID-19 infection risk.Design & setting Qualitative interview study in general practices in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire.Method Longitudinal semi-structured interviews with clinical and managerial practice staff at four timepoints between May and July 2020.Results Practices worked flexibly within general national guidance to determine when face-to-face contact with patients was necessary, influenced by knowledge of the patient, experience, and practice resilience. For example, practices prioritised patients according to clinical need using face-to-face contact to resolve clinician uncertainty or provide adequate reassurance to patients. To make face-to-face contact as safe as possible and keep patients separated, practices introduced a heterogeneous range of measures that exploited features of their indoor and outdoor spaces and altered their appointment processes. As national restrictions eased in June and July, the number and proportion of patients seen face-to-face generally increased. However, the reconfiguration of buildings and processes reduced the available capacity and put increased pressure on practices.Conclusion Practices responded rapidly and creatively to the initial lockdown restrictions. The variety of ways practices organised face-to-face contact to minimise infection highlights the need for flexibility in guidance.