RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cross-sectoral video consultation in cancer care: GPs’ evaluation of a randomised controlled trial
JF BJGP Open
JO BJGP Open
FD Royal College of General Practitioners
SP BJGPO.2020.0114
DO 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0114
VO 5
IS 2
A1 Theis Bitz Trabjerg
A1 Lars Henrik Jensen
A1 Jens Sondergaard
A1 Sonja Wehberg
A1 Jeffrey James Sisler
A1 Dorte Gilså Hansen
YR 2021
UL http://bjgpopen.org/content/5/2/BJGPO.2020.0114.abstract
AB Background Shared care models present an opportunity for patients to receive the benefits of specialist care combined with the continuity of care provided by a GP.Aim To test the effects on GP-perceived involvement in cancer care and their satisfaction with this cross-sectoral information after bringing the patient, GP, and oncologist together in a shared video consultation.Design & setting GPs from the Region of Southern Denmark evaluated a randomised controlled trial testing shared video consultations.Method This study describes secondary outcomes based on a 4 months' follow-up survey from GPs participating in The Partnership Project (PSP). Patient perception of coordination of care at 7 months' follow-up was the primary outcome of the PSP. A tripartite video consultation was conducted during cancer treatment to share tasks and roles between health professionals with the patient.Results The study included 281 patients, and 105 unique GPs returned 124 questionnaires. Video consultations were accomplished in 68% of scheduled cases. The study found an increased odds ratio (OR) of 3.03 for GP satisfaction with the distribution of tasks and roles, and they experienced more involvement in the cancer patients' trajectory. The study found an increased OR of 6.95 for the GP perception of more direct contact and dialogue with the Department of Oncology. There was a decreased OR of 0.88 for the GP to be engaged in handling anxiety and psychological concerns.Conclusion The study showed that involving the GP in one shared consultation increased the odds of the GP being satisfied with the distribution of tasks and roles, and feeling more involved in the cancer patient’s trajectory. However, recruitment and response rates from GPs were limiting factors.