PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Stafford, Mai AU - Deeny, Sarah R AU - Dreyer, Kathryn AU - Shand, Jenny TI - Multiple long-term conditions within households and use of health and social care: a retrospective cohort study AID - 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0134 DP - 2021 Apr 01 TA - BJGP Open PG - BJGPO.2020.0134 VI - 5 IP - 2 4099 - http://bjgpopen.org/content/5/2/BJGPO.2020.0134.short 4100 - http://bjgpopen.org/content/5/2/BJGPO.2020.0134.full SO - BJGP Open2021 Apr 01; 5 AB - Background The daily management of long-term conditions falls primarily on individuals and informal carers, but the impact of household context on health and social care activity among people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) is understudied.Aim To test whether co-residence with a person with MLTCs (compared with a co-resident without MLTCs) is associated with utilisation and cost of primary, community, secondary health care, and formal social care.Design & setting Linked data from health providers and local government in Barking and Dagenham for a retrospective cohort of people aged ≥50 years in two-person households in 2016–2018.Method Two-part regression models were applied to estimate annualised use and cost of hospital, primary, community, mental health, and social care by MLTC status of individuals and co-residents, adjusted for age, sex, and deprivation. Applicability at the national level was tested using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).Results Forty-eight per cent of people with MLTCs in two-person households were co-resident with another person with MLTCs. They were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 1.30) times as likely to have community care activity and 1.24 (95% CI = 0.99 to 1.54) times as likely to have mental health care activity compared with those co-resident with a healthy person. They had more primary care visits (8.5 [95% CI = 8.2 to 8.8] versus 7.9 [95% CI = 7.7 to 8.2]) and higher primary care costs. Outpatient care and elective admissions did not differ. Findings in national data were similar.Conclusion Care utilisation for people with MLTCs varies by household context. There may be potential for connecting health and community service input across household members.