RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 GPs’ attitudes towards the diagnosis and treatment of male urinary tract infections: a qualitative interview study in Ireland
JF BJGP Open
JO BJGP Open
FD Royal College of General Practitioners
SP bjgpopen19X101667
DO 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101667
VO 3
IS 4
A1 Fallon, Róisín
A1 Farrell, Karen
A1 Leon, Genevieve
A1 Rajan, Aparna
A1 Duane, Sinead
A1 FitzGerald, Christine
A1 Tierney, Marie
A1 Vellinga, Akke
YR 2019
UL http://bjgpopen.org/content/3/4/bjgpopen19X101667.abstract
AB Background In general practice, males represent around 20% of the total number of urinary tract infection (UTI) consultations. The majority of UTI research focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of women with UTIs but there is little evidence on how male UTIs are treated.Aim To better understand GPs’ attitudes towards the diagnosis and treatment of male UTIs. This research aimed to support future investigations to determine best practice in diagnosis and treatment of male UTI.Design and setting A qualitative interview study was carried out with 15 GPs across Ireland.Method A topic guide was created to ensure consistency in interviews. The interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.Results Fifteen interviews with GPs were completed. Analysis indicated that GPs’ knowledge of guidelines and implementation of them varied widely when deciding a treatment plan for a male presenting with UTI symptoms. There was clear consensus that male UTIs were uncommon and complicated to diagnose. Three GPs reported never treating a male UTI, while others reported treating <5 patients in their careers. There was an assumption that sexually transmitted infections (STI) take precedence in young males when presenting with similar symptoms. The use of antimicrobial treatment guidelines varied widely, in line with the interpretation of the origin and severity of symptoms.Conclusion Male UTIs are perceived by GPs as rare and complicated. GPs expressed that patient age, resources, and guidelines available limited their confidence in diagnosing and treating male UTIs.