@article {Fidjelandbjgpopen19X101663, author = {Heidi Lidal Fidjeland and Ingvild Vistad and Svein Gjelstad and Mette Brekke}, title = {Exploring why patients with cancer consult GPs: a 1-year data extraction}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, elocation-id = {bjgpopen19X101663}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.3399/bjgpopen19X101663}, publisher = {Royal College of General Practitioners}, abstract = {Background Survival rates of patients with cancer are increasing owing to improvements in diagnostics and therapies. The traditional hospital-based follow-up model faces challenges because of the consequent increasing workload, and it has been suggested that selected patients with cancer could be followed up by GPs.The hypothesis of the study was that, regardless of the hospital-based follow-up care, GPs see their patients with cancer both for cancer-related problems as well as for other reasons. Thus, a formalised follow-up by GPs would not mean too large a change in GPs{\textquoteright} workloads.Aim To explore to what extent patients with cancer consult their GPs, and for what reasons.Design \& setting A 1-year explorative study was undertaken, based on data from 91 Norwegian GPs from 2016{\textendash}2017.Method The data were electronically extracted from GPs{\textquoteright} electronic medical records (EMR).Results Data were collected from 91 GPs. There were 11 074 consultations in total, generated by 1932 patients with cancer. The mean consultation rate was higher among the patients with cancer compared with Norwegian patients in general. In one-third of the consultations, cancer was the main diagnosis. Apart from cancer, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal diagnoses were common. Patients with cancer who had multiple diagnoses or psychological diagnoses did not consult their GP significantly more often than patients with cancer without such comorbidity.Conclusion This study confirms that patients with cancer consult their GP more often than other patients, both for cancer-related reasons and for various comorbidities. A formalised follow-up by GPs would probably be feasible, and GPs should prepare for this responsibility.}, URL = {https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/4/bjgpopen19X101663}, eprint = {https://bjgpopen.org/content/3/4/bjgpopen19X101663.full.pdf}, journal = {BJGP Open} }