Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a primary care consultation tool: a pilot controlled trial

Simone Postma, Henk Schers, Reinier Akkermans, Kees van Boven, Debby Gerritsen and Tim olde Hartman
BJGP Open 19 August 2026; BJGPO.2026.0078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2026.0078
Simone Postma
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk Schers
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reinier Akkermans
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kees van Boven
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debby Gerritsen
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim olde Hartman
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tim olde Hartman
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The Primary Care Functioning Consultation Tool (PCFCT) supports the integration of different aspects of health related functioning for patients with multimorbidity in disease management programs.

Aim To assess feasibility, satisfaction, and potential effectiveness of the PCFCT on functioning, self-efficacy, illness perceptions, and disease performance indicators in daily general practice.

Design & setting Pilot non-randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practices

Method Patients with multimorbidity were allocated to the intervention group (consultations with the practice nurse using the consultation tool) or to the control group (regular consultations). Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and identified patients at baseline and 3 months. After 3 months, satisfaction of patients and nurses was measured. Potential treatment effects were assessed using the Primary Care Functioning Scale, Self-efficacy Questionnaire, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and disease-related outcomes.

Results Sixty-five patients were included (31 intervention, 34 control). Both patients and practice nurses reported high satisfaction and acceptability. Nineteen control patients (59%) and 24 intervention patients (80%) completed all questionnaires at baseline and 3 months. Between-group differences were not statistically significant, however intervention patients showed small exploratory differences towards better functioning, higher self-efficacy, and more adaptive illness perceptions. Missing data ranged from 25% to>90% across disease performance indicators, precluding reliable comparisons.

Conclusion The PCFCT is feasible, acceptable, and can be embedded within existing chronic disease management, with the potential to improve patient outcomes.

  • multimorbidity
  • general practice
  • patient functioning
  • consultation tool
  • feasibility
  • non-randomized controlled trial
  • Received March 31, 2026.
  • Revision received May 27, 2026.
  • Accepted June 22, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a primary care consultation tool: a pilot controlled trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a primary care consultation tool: a pilot controlled trial
Simone Postma, Henk Schers, Reinier Akkermans, Kees van Boven, Debby Gerritsen, Tim olde Hartman
BJGP Open 19 August 2026; BJGPO.2026.0078. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2026.0078

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a primary care consultation tool: a pilot controlled trial
Simone Postma, Henk Schers, Reinier Akkermans, Kees van Boven, Debby Gerritsen, Tim olde Hartman
BJGP Open 19 August 2026; BJGPO.2026.0078. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2026.0078
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • LinkedIn logo LinkedIn
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • Bluesky logo Bluesky

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Multimorbidity
  • general practice
  • patient functioning
  • consultation tool
  • feasibility
  • non-randomized controlled trial

More in this TOC Section

  • A systematic review of behavioural interventions for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections
  • Factors affecting the likelihood of documented medication concerns in patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study in primary care
  • Workplace wellbeing for the general practice workforce across England: mapping current services
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795