Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

The telesafe archive: a feasibility study of assembling a database of UK primary care telephone consultations

Peter Edwards, Barbara Caddick, Adam Skeen, Jordan Lin, Helena Thornton, Matthew Ridd, Rebecca Barnes and Chris Salisbury
BJGP Open 3 August 2026; BJGPO.2025.0220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0220
Peter Edwards
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Caddick
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Barbara Caddick
Adam Skeen
2 University of Birmingham, Birmingham,, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordan Lin
3 Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helena Thornton
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Ridd
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Barnes
4 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rebecca Barnes
Chris Salisbury
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris Salisbury
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background In 2024, one-third of GP appointments in England were conducted by telephone. What happens during these consultations is largely unknown.

Aim To test the feasibility of collecting recorded GP telephone consultations with linked data and consent for reuse.

Design & setting Retrospective observational study in seven practices in South West England collected from April 2023 to June 2024.

Method Adults who had a telephone consultation at practices that routinely recorded calls were invited to consent to retrieval of the audio, a 4-month electronic health record (EHR) extract, and a post-consultation questionnaire. Practice-level consent rates were analysed with regression.

Results Of 28 clinicians recruited, 19 GPs contributed retrievable, usable recordings with consent for research re-use. Of 2,053 patients invited, 123 consented (6.0%), with lower consent in more deprived practices (IMD deciles 1–2 versus 9–10: OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.54). Of 101 recordings retrieved, 96 were usable and 91 had consent for research re-use. Of these, 86 were linked to EHR data and 89 to patient questionnaires. Mean consultation duration was 7 minutes 13 seconds, and typing was audible in 63/91 (69%). Overall, 161 problems were discussed, averaging 1.77 per consultation. Most patients were happy their consultation was by telephone (96/117, 82%), although most reported usually preferring face-to-face appointments (68/115, 59%).

Conclusion It is feasible to assemble a reusable archive of GP telephone consultations with linked data. However, recruitment was low using retrospective remote consent. Future work should test alternative recruitment approaches and consider oversampling at practices serving deprived populations.

  • Family medicine
  • Research methods (other)
  • Consultation skills
  • Received October 6, 2025.
  • Revision received June 24, 2026.
  • Accepted July 23, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The telesafe archive: a feasibility study of assembling a database of UK primary care telephone consultations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
The telesafe archive: a feasibility study of assembling a database of UK primary care telephone consultations
Peter Edwards, Barbara Caddick, Adam Skeen, Jordan Lin, Helena Thornton, Matthew Ridd, Rebecca Barnes, Chris Salisbury
BJGP Open 3 August 2026; BJGPO.2025.0220. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0220

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
The telesafe archive: a feasibility study of assembling a database of UK primary care telephone consultations
Peter Edwards, Barbara Caddick, Adam Skeen, Jordan Lin, Helena Thornton, Matthew Ridd, Rebecca Barnes, Chris Salisbury
BJGP Open 3 August 2026; BJGPO.2025.0220. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0220
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • LinkedIn logo LinkedIn
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • Bluesky logo Bluesky

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Family medicine
  • research methods (other)
  • Consultation skills

More in this TOC Section

  • General practice organisation in France: ecological analysis of mortality and life expectancy
  • General practitioners’ perspectives on suicide prevention in primary care: a qualitative study
  • Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a primary care consultation tool: a pilot controlled trial
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795