Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Protocol

Realist evaluation of multi-professional advanced practice in primary care (REMAP): study protocol

Rachel King, Stefanie Williamson, Pauline Anne Nelson, Rachael Finn, Damian Hodgson, Caroline Mitchell, Julian Barratt, Michelle Horspool, Aaishah Aslam and Emily Wood
BJGP Open 6 February 2026; BJGPO.2025.0272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0272
Rachel King
1 University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rachel King
Stefanie Williamson
2 The University of Sheffield Management School, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefanie Williamson
Pauline Anne Nelson
2 The University of Sheffield Management School, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Finn
2 The University of Sheffield Management School, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damian Hodgson
2 The University of Sheffield Management School, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Damian Hodgson
Caroline Mitchell
3 Keele University, Keele, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caroline Mitchell
Julian Barratt
1 University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Horspool
4 Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS FT, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaishah Aslam
1 University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Wood
5 Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily Wood
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The introduction of advanced practitioners (APs) is one approach to addressing health and care workforce shortages, with around 6000 APs working in primary care in England. There is variation in implementation, regulation, and scope of the role, and limited knowledge on implications of their implementation on workforce organisation, staff and patients. There is a pressing need for research to understand what works in advanced practice implementation, for whom and in which contexts.

Aim To understand the contexts and mechanisms that influence key outcomes in the implementation of multiprofessional advanced practice in primary care in England and develop recommendations to support workforce development.

Design & setting A realist evaluation using mixed methods across four work packages in primary care in England, incorporating research with advanced practice workforce leads, APs, key primary care staff (clinical and management), and patients and carers.

Method The following approaches will be taken: i) semi-structured interviews with advanced practice workforce leads in England to inform the development of an initial programme theory (IPT) (n=15); ii) online survey of APs in England to refine IPT (n>300); iii) case studies in five GP practices in England, interviewing staff members (n=10), conducting interviews or focus groups with patients (n=5) and gathering documentary data (to test and modify the IPT); iv) stakeholder workshops to share findings and develop policy and practice recommendations.

Conclusion Findings will be used to inform recommendations for the implementation of advanced practice in primary care, to support workforce development, enhance patient experience and improve health outcomes.

  • Advanced practice
  • primary health care
  • realist evaluation
  • Received December 12, 2025.
  • Accepted December 22, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2026, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Realist evaluation of multi-professional advanced practice in primary care (REMAP): study protocol
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Realist evaluation of multi-professional advanced practice in primary care (REMAP): study protocol
Rachel King, Stefanie Williamson, Pauline Anne Nelson, Rachael Finn, Damian Hodgson, Caroline Mitchell, Julian Barratt, Michelle Horspool, Aaishah Aslam, Emily Wood
BJGP Open 6 February 2026; BJGPO.2025.0272. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0272

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Realist evaluation of multi-professional advanced practice in primary care (REMAP): study protocol
Rachel King, Stefanie Williamson, Pauline Anne Nelson, Rachael Finn, Damian Hodgson, Caroline Mitchell, Julian Barratt, Michelle Horspool, Aaishah Aslam, Emily Wood
BJGP Open 6 February 2026; BJGPO.2025.0272. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0272
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Advanced practice
  • primary health care
  • realist evaluation

More in this TOC Section

  • Understanding and improving compound pressures in general practice: a realist review protocol
  • Personalising renal function monitoring and interventions in people living with heart failure: a protocol for co-designing a care pathway in the RENAL-HF programme
Show more Protocol

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795