Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared to non-dispensing practices

Ian Holdroyd, Liam Loftus, Cameron Appel, Efthalia Massou and John Ford
BJGP Open 21 August 2025; BJGPO.2025.0115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115
Ian Holdroyd
1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian Holdroyd
Liam Loftus
1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cameron Appel
1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Efthalia Massou
2Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Ford
1Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Dispensing practices, which have in-house dispensaries, are paid to dispense medications directly to patients. Evidence suggests that this financial incentive influences prescribing behaviour, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

Aim To investigate the impact of dispensing status on prescription length in England.

Design & Setting Quasi-experimental, repeated-measures, cross-sectional study of English General Practices.

Method Business administration data classified practices as dispensing or non-dispensing, determined the percentage of patients eligible for dispensing, and captured prescription lengths for seven drugs with fixed dosing regimens at three-month intervals from July 2023 to April 2024. Generalised estimating equations analysed the relationship between dispensing status and the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing with average prescription length, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.

Results Adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, dispensing practices prescribed shorter average lengths for all drugs. Desogestrel showed the largest difference (21.9 days shorter), followed by indapamide standard release (9.85 days), indapamide modified release (9.71 days), ezetimibe (8.41 days), tamsulosin (7.18 days), alendronic acid (6.63 days), and dapagliflozin (5.85 days). An increase in the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing was associated with significantly shorter prescription lengths across all drugs. Dispensing practices more consistently prescribed medications for 28–31 days, whereas non-dispensing practices showed greater variability.

Conclusion Dispensing practices are associated with shorter prescription lengths, increasing the number of prescriptions issued over time and the associated dispensing fee. The absence of clear guidance on prescription lengths likely contributes to this—central bodies should consider providing explicit recommendations to optimise prescription durations.

  • General practice
  • Primary care
  • Health sector reform
  • Received June 17, 2025.
  • Accepted July 12, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2025, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared to non-dispensing practices
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared to non-dispensing practices
Ian Holdroyd, Liam Loftus, Cameron Appel, Efthalia Massou, John Ford
BJGP Open 21 August 2025; BJGPO.2025.0115. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared to non-dispensing practices
Ian Holdroyd, Liam Loftus, Cameron Appel, Efthalia Massou, John Ford
BJGP Open 21 August 2025; BJGPO.2025.0115. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • general practice
  • primary care
  • Health sector reform

More in this TOC Section

  • Checklists for emergencies in general practice: Participatory design of a quick reference handbook
  • Factors affecting the likelihood of documented medication concerns in patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study in primary care
  • GPs’ perspectives regarding suicide prevention: a systematic scoping review
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795