Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Stakeholder perceptions of supporting patients’ return-to-work in primary care: a qualitative study

Rosie Harrison, Gwenllian Wynne Jones, Vaughan Parsons, Ira Madan, Carolyn Chew-Graham, John Pemberton, Gemma Mansell, Karen Walker-Bone, Nadine E Foster and Benjamin Saunders On behalf of the wider WAVE trial team
BJGP Open 5 June 2025; BJGPO.2024.0280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0280
Rosie Harrison
1Research Associate, Keele university, England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rosie Harrison
Gwenllian Wynne Jones
2Professor of Nursing, Keele University, England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gwenllian Wynne Jones
Vaughan Parsons
3Research Manager and Research Fellow, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust / King's College, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ira Madan
4Occupational Health Service, Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn Chew-Graham
5Professor of General Practice Research, Keele University, England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Pemberton
6Public Contributor, Keele University, England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gemma Mansell
7Lecturer in Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Walker-Bone
8Professor of Occupational Rheumatology, University of Monash, Australia, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadine E Foster
9NHMRC Leadership Fellow and Director UQ Clinical Trials Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Saunders
10Senior Lecturer in Health Research, Keele University, England, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Benjamin Saunders
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Over 2.6 million people in the UK are absent from work due to ill-health, yet, for many, accessing work-orientated vocational support to facilitate return-to-work (RTW) is challenging. The majority of fit notes are issued in primary care, making this an ideal setting to provide vocational support.

Aim As part of the Work And Vocational advicE (WAVE) randomised controlled trial (RCT; registry number NCT04543097), we explored the delivery of vocational support by trained Vocational Support Workers (VSWs), from the perspectives of patients, VSWs, employers and general practitioners.

Design & setting In the WAVE RCT, patients from 10 UK general practices were randomised to the offer of usual care or usual care plus vocational support. This qualitative study explored stakeholder perspectives of the vocational support intervention.

Method Semi-structured interviews with participants in the intervention arm (n=10), employers, VSWs and GPs (n=5). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Public and Patient Involvement was embedded throughout.

Results Taking a person-centred, individualised approach to vocational support enabled VSWs to identify and mitigate RTW obstacles and support participants’ self-efficacy to proactively negotiate RTW. The perceived independence of the VSWs from employers and healthcare was considered important and facilitated more open discussions about capabilities and RTW planning.

Conclusion Findings indicate that individualised and independent vocational support offered to patients referred from primary care was perceived by all stakeholders to be valuable to patients absent from work due to illness and supported their RTW planning. These insights can inform future models of vocational support.

  • Qualitative research
  • Patient perspectives
  • Occupational health
  • Received November 19, 2024.
  • Revision received May 19, 2025.
  • Accepted May 22, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2025, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stakeholder perceptions of supporting patients’ return-to-work in primary care: a qualitative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Stakeholder perceptions of supporting patients’ return-to-work in primary care: a qualitative study
Rosie Harrison, Gwenllian Wynne Jones, Vaughan Parsons, Ira Madan, Carolyn Chew-Graham, John Pemberton, Gemma Mansell, Karen Walker-Bone, Nadine E Foster, Benjamin Saunders
BJGP Open 5 June 2025; BJGPO.2024.0280. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0280

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Stakeholder perceptions of supporting patients’ return-to-work in primary care: a qualitative study
Rosie Harrison, Gwenllian Wynne Jones, Vaughan Parsons, Ira Madan, Carolyn Chew-Graham, John Pemberton, Gemma Mansell, Karen Walker-Bone, Nadine E Foster, Benjamin Saunders
BJGP Open 5 June 2025; BJGPO.2024.0280. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0280
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • qualitative research
  • Patient perspectives
  • Occupational health

More in this TOC Section

  • How does decontextualised risk information affect clinicians understanding of risk and uncertainty in primary care diagnosis? A qualitative study of clinical vignettes
  • Declining number of home visits to older adults by GPs: an observational study using data from electronic health records in The Netherlands, 2017–2023
  • What’s been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795