Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Content and timing of the 6–8 week maternal postnatal check: a mixed-methods study

Clare Macdonald, Fiona Cross-Sudworth, Laura Quinn, Christine MacArthur, Debra Bick, Ellie Jones and Beck Taylor
BJGP Open 8 April 2025; BJGPO.2024.0229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0229
Clare Macdonald
1Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clare Macdonald
  • For correspondence: ccm011@student.bham.ac.uk
Fiona Cross-Sudworth
2Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fiona Cross-Sudworth
Laura Quinn
1Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Quinn
Christine MacArthur
1Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christine MacArthur
Debra Bick
3Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellie Jones
1Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ellie Jones
Beck Taylor
2Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Beck Taylor
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Time taken and given for GP postnatal care appointments. Green points represent where the time taken is less than the time given (below the dotted line); orange points represent when the time taken is the same as the time given (intersecting the line); and red points represent when the time taken is more than the time given for appointments (above the line). Frequency weights are used

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Characteristics of GP focus group participants
    Characteristics of GPs (n = 14)n
    Years qualified
     N/A (GPST)1
     ≤55
     6–102
     11–204
     ≥212
    GP job role
     Locum1
     Partner2
     Salaried10
     Trainee1
    Is a parent
     Yes11
     No3
    Gender
     Female13
     Male1
    Location
     East Midlands5
     North East1
     London2
     West Midlands6
    Deprivation level of practicea
     Affluent2
     Deprived9
     Mixed2
    Ethnic diversity of practicea
     Very little diversity, mostly White British8
     Very diverse, multi-ethnic2
     Mixed3
    • an = 13, not applicable to locum GP. GPST = general practice specialty trainee

    • View popup
    Table 2. Characteristics of women focus group participants
    Characteristics of women (n = 18)n
    Agea
     21–241
     25–298
     30–345
     35–403
    Ethnicity
     African1
     Arab1
     Bangladeshi2
     Chinese1
     English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, or British4
     Indian4
     Other Asian background not specified1
     Other White background not specified1
     Pakistani3
    Number of children
     112
     26
    Long-term condition before pregnancy
     Yes3
     No15
    Developed diabetes, high blood pressure, or mental health problem during pregnancy
     Yes6
     No12
    Type of birth
     Caesarean section11
     Instrumental2
     Vaginal5
    • an = 17, one participant did not disclose age

    • View popup
    Table 3. Characteristics of GP survey participants
    Characteristics of survey participants (n = 671)Participants respondingTotal responders, n
    n%
    Years qualified671
     N/A (GPST)355
     ≤515924
     6–1016625
     11–2018027
     ≥2113120
    GP job role  671
     Locum457
     Partner31146
     Salaried27241
     Trainee355
     Other (for example, military GP)81
    Gender  668
     Female54882
     Male11818
     Non-binary1<1
     Prefer not to say1<1
    Is a parent  671
     Yes56184
     No10916
     Prefer not to say1<1
    Location  671
     East of England6410
     London7511
     Midlands22534
     North East and Yorkshire12619
     North West507
     South East6410
     South West6710
    Setting of practice  669
     City24236
     Town20731
     Rural9114
     Mixed12919
    Deprivation level of practice  669
     Affluent8413
     Mixed41362
     Deprived17226
    List size of practice  657
     ≤300051
     3001–10 00023135
     10 001–20 00032950
     ≥20 0019214
    Ethnic diversity of practice  671
     Very little diversity, mostly White British33550
     Mixed20731
     Very diverse, multi-ethnic12919
    Aware of national guidance on the 6–8 week check671
     Yes42263
     No24937
    Uses a template to document the consultation  665
     Yes46670
     No18928
     Don’t know102
    • View popup
    Table 4. GP reported frequency of completion of 26 clinical items taken from NICE guidance for the routine 6–8 week consultation
    AlwaysVery oftenSometimesRarelyNever
    Discussion about:n%n%n%n%n%
     Mental health5518275113657120.3
     Recognising physical problems4556812218701020341
     Pelvic floor exercises2413616625149228613294
     Fatigue15723179272153210015203
     Diet, exercise, smoking, etc15223179271902812619244
     Contraception6479621320.310.200
     Sexual intercourse32448151231301958981
     Safeguarding2523815223186286910122
     Birth experience3885814722931435581
    Specific history taking for:
     Infection2263414021198309114162
     Pain2503716725171256910142
     Vaginal loss476711051657827461
     Bladder function2854213420158247912152
     Bowel function2674012118179278212223
     Breast problems2643916124161247111142
     Thromboembolism365801220931264398212
     Pre-eclampsia5186710169252694011517
     Wound healing459681482242618341
     Anaemia10315155232513712919335
     Psychological wellbeing58587711114210.1500
    Clinical examination of:
     Signs of possible VTE173142130192904322033
     Blood pressure2193312218227348513183
     Vaginal problems50773113244816925558
     Caesarean section wound (when applicable)29043204301522318371
     Perineal wound (when applicable)1462217927246377912213
    Review and plan follow-up for:
     Pregnancy complications, for example, diabetes, hypertension44266163245898100
    • NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. VTE = venous thromboembolism.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Associations between 26 clinical items from NICE recommendations and GP characteristics; differences reported where P<0.05. In all cases for gender, female GPs reported higher frequency. In all cases for parent status, parent GPs reported higher frequency. In all cases for ‘awareness of guidance’, GPs who were aware of national guidance on the 6–8 week check reported higher frequency. In all cases for ‘use of template’, GPs who used templates to document the consultation reported higher frequency. Specific associations between ‘years of experience’ and ‘role’ varied and are described in the comments column. (Contingency tables in the Supplementary Data.)
    Years of
    experience
    RoleGenderParentAwareness of guidanceUse of templateComments
    Discussion about:
     Mental health------
     Recognising physical problems----<0.0010.002
     Pelvic floor exercises--<0.0010.002<0.001<0.001
     Fatigue0.0000.0390.003<0.001<0.0010.046more frequent in 11–20 and ≥21 years more frequent in partners and locums
     Diet, exercise, smoking, etc-0.002--<0.001<0.001more frequent in locums and GPSTs
     Contraception--0.006---
     Sexual intercourse--<0.0010.004<0.001<0.001
     Safeguarding0.000---<0.001<0.001more frequent in GPST and ≤5 years
     Birth experience--<0.001-0.0090.042
    Specific history taking for:
     Infection----0.0010.009
     Pain---<0.001<0.001
     Vaginal loss--<0.001-0.0030.017
     Bladder function--<0.001-<0.0010.003
     Bowel function--0.003-<0.0010.024
     Breast problems--0.001-0.001-
     Thromboembolism----<0.001<0.001
     Pre-eclampsia----<0.0010.004
     Wound healing--<0.001-0.039-
     Anaemia0.013---<0.0010.001more frequent in GPST and ≥21 years
     Psychological wellbeing--<0.001-0.032-
    Clinical examination of:
     Signs of possible VTE0.004---<0.001-more frequent in GPST and ≥21 years
     Blood pressure---0.024<0.001<0.001
     Vaginal problems--<0.001---
     Caesarean section wound (when applicable)------
     Perineal wound (when applicable)0.0490.019<0.0010.0010.032-more frequent in GPST
    more frequent in GPSTs and locums
    Review and plan follow-up for:
     Pregnancy complications, for example, diabetes, hypertension--0.025-0.0020.015
    • GPST = general practice specialty trainee. NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. VTE = venous thromboembolism

Supplementary Data

  • Mac_BJGPO-2024-0229_supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy. 

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Content and timing of the 6–8 week maternal postnatal check: a mixed-methods study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Content and timing of the 6–8 week maternal postnatal check: a mixed-methods study
Clare Macdonald, Fiona Cross-Sudworth, Laura Quinn, Christine MacArthur, Debra Bick, Ellie Jones, Beck Taylor
BJGP Open 8 April 2025; BJGPO.2024.0229. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0229

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Content and timing of the 6–8 week maternal postnatal check: a mixed-methods study
Clare Macdonald, Fiona Cross-Sudworth, Laura Quinn, Christine MacArthur, Debra Bick, Ellie Jones, Beck Taylor
BJGP Open 8 April 2025; BJGPO.2024.0229. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0229
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • women's health
  • obstetrics
  • maternal health
  • Mental health
  • general practitioners
  • primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • Podcasting in primary care: attitudes of Scottish GP specialty trainees and trainers towards podcast-based education in primary care
  • Patient perceptions of relational continuity in England: insights from two cross-sectional surveys
  • COVID-19 and patient-reported experience of general practice in England
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795