Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice

Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen and Jesper Lykkegaard
BJGP Open 20 February 2025; BJGPO.2024.0234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234
Jonas Korsholm Olsen
1Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonas Korsholm Olsen
Sonja Wehberg
1Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frans Boch Waldorff
2Section of General Practice and The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen
3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen
Jesper Lykkegaard
1Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background There may be distinctly different ways for general practices to serve the growing population of older patients, providing them different combinations of face-to-face-, telephone-, and e-mail consultations, home visits, and chronic care reviews.

Aim To identify latent general practice profiles of frequency and combination of consultation types for older patients and relate them to practice characteristics.

Design & setting Register-based cohort study of all Danish citizens aged≥75 years.

Method For each of the years 2017-2021, a latent profile analysis was conducted on the practices’ frequencies of consultation types adjusting for patient population characteristics.

Results We identified a “Majority” and three temporary latent profiles of provision of consultation services to older patients: The “Phone heavy” profile (8-10% of practices, 2017-2019) providing nearly double the telephone consultations as the “Majority” profile and was associated with the general practitioners being older and working singlehanded, the “High frequency” profile (12-14% of practices, 2017-2018) providing higher levels of face-to-face, telephone, and e-mail consultations than the “Majority” profile, and the “Phone and e-mail heavy” profile (7% of practices, 2020) providing more e-mail than face-to-face consultations, and more of each consultation than the “Majority” profile. The number of profiles decreased from 3 in 2017 to only the “Majority” profile 2021.

Conclusion There is a trend towards a more uniform pattern of consultations for older patients in general practice. It is unknown whether high provision of certain types of consultations in general practice has downstream effects, such as decreased need for hospital- and out-of-hours services.

  • Practice organisation
  • Family medicine
  • Care of the elderly
  • Received September 25, 2024.
  • Revision received January 23, 2025.
  • Accepted February 12, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2025, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice
Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard
BJGP Open 20 February 2025; BJGPO.2024.0234. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Consultation frequency patterns for older patients in Danish general practice
Jonas Korsholm Olsen, Sonja Wehberg, Frans Boch Waldorff, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Jesper Lykkegaard
BJGP Open 20 February 2025; BJGPO.2024.0234. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0234
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Practice organisation
  • Family medicine
  • Care of the elderly

More in this TOC Section

  • Podcasting in primary care: attitudes of Scottish GP specialty trainees and trainers towards podcast-based education in primary care
  • Patient perceptions of relational continuity in England: insights from two cross-sectional surveys
  • COVID-19 and patient-reported experience of general practice in England
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795