Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Protocol

General practice management after transition events: protocol for an experience-based co-design study

Zakia Shariff, Jeremy Dale and Rachel Ann Spencer
BJGP Open 17 September 2024; BJGPO.2023.0244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0244
Zakia Shariff
1 Warwick Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zakia Shariff
  • For correspondence: zakia.shariff@warwick.ac.uk
Jeremy Dale
1 Warwick Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Ann Spencer
1 Warwick Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rachel Ann Spencer
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Discharge from hospital is a critical part of the patient journey, particularly for older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. General practice has a key role in managing the post-discharge course of patients. A communication intervention for use in general practice in the immediate post-discharge period has great potential to improve shared decision making, enhancing patient experiences of post-discharge care.

Aim General Practice Management After Transition Events (GP-MATE) aims to produce a tool for older patients and their carers (GP-MATE), which will assist better communication with their general practice about their care after discharge, thereby improving patient safety outcomes.

Design & setting Experience-based co-design (EBCD) study involving general practices across the West Midlands.

Method A slightly modified approach to EBCD will be followed to create GP-MATE. A focused ethnography undertaken at general practices will provide an understanding of practices’ systems for post-discharge management of older patients. Semi-structured video interviews with recently discharged older patients or their carers will be edited into a trigger film. Finally, co-design workshops with older people, carers, and healthcare staff working in general practices will take place with participants from three regions across England.

Conclusion EBCD will be used to take a patient-centric approach towards creating GP-MATE; patients’ and carers’ priorities will be directly reflected within the tool. GP-MATE will be a low-cost intervention that improves health literacy, empowering patients to fill the emerging gap in continuity in the post-discharge period and enhancing patient experiences of post-discharge care.

  • general practice
  • transition
  • experience
  • decision making
  • communication

How this fits in

General practice has an important role in managing the post-discharge course of patients. However, there are currently very few tools to support post-discharge contact, nor any accepted structure for what consultations with older recently discharged patients should look like. GP-MATE will be a communication intervention for use in general practice in the immediate post-discharge period that aims to help improve shared decision making and enhance patient experiences of post-discharge care.

Introduction

Discharge from hospital is a critical part of the patient journey, particularly for older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. As the population of older patients increases, pressure rises in all areas of the NHS,1 including an enormous burden of complex care for primary care when patients return home. Data collected by the National Reporting and Learning System on discharge-related harms, including death, found that three-quarters of patients experiencing serious harm owing to incomplete discharge planning were older.2 There are many plausible routes to reducing these errors and harms including the design of safer systems, protected time and workspace, and better integration between primary and secondary care,3 but one of the least researched avenues is communicating with patients to close the error loop.4

A communication intervention for the immediate post-discharge period has great potential to improve shared decision making, enhancing patient experiences of post-discharge care. Primary care is uniquely placed to manage the post-discharge course of patients; it is the comprehensive health record holder, the first point of contact for patients, and the provider of ongoing care. GPs offer a unique service for their older patients in terms of medical overview of care and advocacy based on continuity from a developed relationship.5 However, a recent scoping review to identify existing tools for post-discharge communication found no ready-made tools specifically created for primary care.6 General Practice Management After Transition Events (GP-MATE) will aim to address this gap by producing a tool for older patients and their carers (GP-MATE), which will assist better communication with their general practice about their care after discharge, thereby improving patient safety outcomes.

GP-MATE will use experience-based co-design (EBCD) to create this tool, maximising patient involvement at all stages. EBCD consists of two core elements, an experience element and a participatory, co-design element. The experience element places a focus on improving the whole experience of a product or service and makes use of practical tools and concepts such as emotional mapping.7 The other central thread underpinning EBCD is the co-design process, where users are directly involved in the design and development of an intervention to improve a product or service.8

Method

GP-MATE uses a slightly modified approach to EBCD. While generally, EBCD is conducted within a single secondary care organisation as part of a quality improvement process,9 there is growing evidence of its potential to be used within larger intervention development studies.10 GP-MATE uses EBCD as part of a larger study, in which the tool developed is taken forward in a feasibility study to test acceptability and usability. The overall aim is to provide evidence such that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) can recommend GP-MATE to be adopted into routine practice. Patients are therefore being recruited from a range of practices, resulting in a wider demographic of patients and carers and a reflection of multiple organisations’ systems. Furthermore, while EBCD is generally conducted using the same participants for both the experience and co-design elements, we are recruiting different cohorts of patients to ensure a diverse group of participants representative of the heterogeneous older population. This slightly modified approach is illustrated in Figure 1 and is similar to the approach described by Bate and Robert.11

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1. Stages of the evidence-based co-design process as modified for GP-MATE

Observation to gain an understanding of what is currently happening

EBCD starts by using ethnographic methods to gain an insight into how a service works and what patient and staff experiences may be.12 To recruit practices for this stage, the study team will work alongside the West Midlands Clinical Research Network (WM CRN). Purposeful sampling will be used to select 10 practices based on size, geography (rural or urban), ethnic diversity, and socioeconomic status. Older patients that have been discharged from hospital in the past 3 months or their carers will be recruited from the 10 practices.

Systems information will be gathered from fieldwork at practices, including informal discussions with administrative and clinical staff. Interview guides have been developed informed by previous research, which found that completing requests for follow-up tests, implementing medication changes, and arranging follow-up appointments were areas where failures in processing requested actions were identified.13 Interview guides consider these key areas, while also considering the discharge process as a whole. The insights gained will be used to create a process map of actions taking place in primary care once a patient leaves hospital.

A number of methods are available to illustrate these process maps. GP-MATE will use the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM),14 a technique that has been used successfully in primary care. FRAM has previously been used to identify key sources of variability in a system and the remedial actions that are needed to help minimise disruption caused by this variability.15

Interview patients and carers and edit interviews into a 25–30-minute film

The sample of patients and carers recruited from stage one will first be screened by the lead GP at each practice so that patients for whom the practice does not hold carer details and who have severe mental health problems or cognitive impairment will be excluded. Eligible patients will be invited to take part in a filmed interview that records important experiences and emotions of, as well as insights into, the person’s journey.16 We aim to interview 10 older patients or their informal carers. This is to maintain the quality of the film; >10 participants can result in viewers finding the narrative difficult to follow.12 The film will be shown to staff and patients to impactfully convey how patients currently experience post-discharge care.12 The film becomes an important catalyst for improvement; seeing and listening to patients allows staff to connect to patients and provides a persuasive starting point for implementing change.17

Participants will be interviewed on film in their own homes either face-to-face or via video link. The interview guide has been developed using a journey format,18 allowing participants to talk about their post-discharge experiences and the communication that followed with their GP practice with minimal interruption. Their needs and preferences for the content and format of GP-MATE will also be explored. A key outcome of these interviews is the identification of ‘touchpoints’, defined as both positive and negative interactions between staff and patients that are perceived as being crucial to the overall experience of care.19

Each individual film will be edited down to provide a 30-minute 'trigger film'.12 This process can be labour intensive and there is a need to avoid any potential for bias; quotes from every participant and both positive and negative experiences will be included.12 Patients themselves will have the final say on the clips included from their individual interview.12

When considering this part of the EBCD process, there are a number of ethical considerations to take into account. The techniques used to address these in GP-MATE are summarised in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Methods for addressing ethical issues during the creation of the trigger film for GP-MATE

Show trigger film to the co-production groups

Presentation of the film to the co-production groups will kick-start the co-production process. During the film, participants will write down any thoughts or reflections, after which an emotional mapping exercise will be undertaken. Emotional mapping will provide patients and staff the opportunity to describe in detail both the positive and negative emotions experienced along the patient journey.16 Following identification of all touchpoints from watching the trigger film, participants will be asked to select key emotions associated with each touchpoint. Touchpoints associated with mainly negative emotions will be prioritised for further action.16

Participants will also be introduced to simplified FRAM diagrams (generated in stage one) of the processes occurring in general practice to help them understand the parts of their post-discharge journey they do not see (the healthcare administrative side). With facilitation from the research team, co-design groups will attempt to overlay the process maps with the results of the emotional mapping from the film, melding the patient and staff experience together for the first time.

Run co-design groups

The co-design process is intended to be a participatory approach to developing an intervention that brings together staff, patients, and carers to design local solutions to local problems.20 The co-design groups in GP-MATE will create a prototype of the communication tool (GP-MATE). The tool itself will be made up of the following three components: 1) a communication tool for patients, carers, and general practice staff; 2) a learning set for general practice staff that includes the implementation strategy for the communication tool; and 3) a space for the interaction between patient or carer and healthcare professional in the general practice appointment book.

The co-design groups will consist of patients (aged ≥65 years) and their informal carers and general practice staff in three different areas of England. Three half-day workshops will be organised (5–8 older people and/or carers per regional group) and data will be analysed iteratively so that emerging results feed into future meetings. The first workshop (as described in stage four) will use the trigger film to simulate discussion on what is important post-discharge. The second meeting will focus on the content of GP-MATE and how it will bring about change. The final meeting, consisting of patients and carers, will involve reviewing previous findings, including findings in relation to the separate staff focus group conducted, and deciding the final intervention.

The staff focus group that feeds into the final patient and carer workshop will be conducted with general practice staff in each of the three regions. A half-day workshop will be conducted where staff will watch the trigger film and will discuss how the intervention fits with available resources. Staff will be asked for ideas on content, format, and usability of GP-MATE and their requirements for a learning set for professionals to assist implementation.

The mixed co-production group will aim to reach consensus on the content of the final prototype tool. Six patient and/or carer representatives and three practice staff members will meet with the research team at this combined event.

Discussion

Summary

EBCD will be used within GP-MATE to develop a tool that will help improve patient communication with general practice following discharge. Patients’ and carers’ priorities will be directly reflected within the tool, which will then be tested in a feasibility study in a general practice setting.

Strengths and limitations

One of the key strengths of the EBCD approach is the flexibility it offers. Primary care organisation is different to secondary care and research methods often need to be adapted to fit. Service development is also different in the primary care setting; it is rare that individual general practices could afford the time and effort required to be invested in a method such as EBCD. Adapting the approach by recruiting a number of general practices helps to overcome this issue while also allowing for the study of multiple organisations’ systems.

Other strengths of this approach include the opportunity to engage and empower patients and staff; EBCD ensures that the patient experience is heard and that an implementation framework is developed that is context sensitive. Staff especially enjoy using EBCD; staff who listen to patient experiences on film are often highly impacted, with previous participants discussing the 'light-bulb moment' that can arise when listening to personal experiences.17

There are some limitations to using EBCD, the main one of which is the timescale and associated costs. An accelerated approach, where individual patient videos are replaced with existing videos from an archive,12 can be used to overcome this limitation. Other limitations include the potential for conflict and tension to arise between patients and staff that often relate to issues of power.21 The research team need to be aware of this and ensure that co-design groups are run appropriately.

Implications for practice

GP-MATE will be a low-cost intervention that improves health literacy, empowering patients to fill the emerging gap in continuity post-discharge. Very few tools currently exist that support primary care staff in post-discharge contact, nor is there any accepted structure for what consultations with frail, older, and recently discharged patients should look like. This research will address these healthcare professional needs directly. In using GP-MATE to improve patient health literacy, secondary care and patients may also benefit from reduced readmissions.

Notes

Funding

This manuscript presents work funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Advanced Fellowship programme (reference number: NIHR301328). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Ethical approval

GP-MATE has received Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales ethical approval (Research Ethics Committee reference number: 21/EE/0227).

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received December 4, 2023.
  • Revision received February 22, 2024.
  • Accepted February 23, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Age UK
    (2019) Briefing: Health and care of older people in England 2019. accessed. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/health--wellbeing/age_uk_briefing_state_of_health_and_care_of_older_people_july2019.pdf. 2 Sep 2024.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Carson-Stevens A,
    2. Hibbert P,
    3. Williams H,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Characterising the nature of primary care patient safety incident reports in the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System: a mixed-methods agenda-setting study for general practice. Health Serv Deliv Res 4 (27), doi:10.3310/hsdr04270.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Spencer RA,
    2. Rodgers S,
    3. Salema N,
    4. et al.
    (2019) Processing discharge summaries in general practice: a qualitative interview study with GPs and practice managers. BJGP Open 3 (1), doi:10.3399/bjgpopen18X101625, pmid:31049407. bjgpopen18X101625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Duck B,
    2. Dunn P,
    3. Foot C,
    4. et al.
    (2014) People in control of their own health and care: the state of involvement. accessed. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/reports/people-control-own-health-care. 2 Sep 2024.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lenaghan NA
    (2019) Transitional care and empowerment of the older adult. Geriatr Nurs 40 (2):148–153, doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.07.005, pmid:30173938.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Spencer RA,
    2. Singh Punia H
    (2021) A scoping review of communication tools applicable to patients and their primary care providers after discharge from hospital. Pat Educ Couns 104 (7):1681–1703, doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.010, pmid:33446366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gage M
    (2002) Making emotional connections through participatory design. accessed. https://boxesandarrows.com/making-emotional-connections-through-participatory-design. 2 Sep 2024.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bate P,
    2. Robert G
    (2007) Toward more user-centric OD: lessons from the field of experience-based design and a case study. J Appl Behav Sci 43 (1):41–66, doi:10.1177/0021886306297014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Raynor DK,
    2. Ismail H,
    3. Blenkinsopp A,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Experience-based co-design-adapting the method for a researcher-initiated study in a multi-site setting. Health Expect 23 (3):562–570, doi:10.1111/hex.13028, pmid:32045087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fylan B,
    2. Tomlinson J,
    3. Raynor DK,
    4. Silcock J
    (2021) Using experience-based co-design with patients, carers and healthcare professionals to develop theory-based interventions for safer medicines use. Res Soc Adm Pharm 17 (12):2127–2135, doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.004, pmid:34187746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bate P,
    2. Robert G
    (2007) Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design (Radcliffe Publishing Ltd, Oxon).
  12. 12.↵
    1. The Point of Care Foundation
    (2021) EBCD: experience-based co-design toolkit. accessed. https://www.pointofcarefoundation.org.uk/resource/experience-based-co-design-ebcd-toolkit. 2 Sep 2024.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Spencer RA,
    2. Spencer SEF,
    3. Rodgers S,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review. Br J Gen Pract 68 (673):e576–e585, doi:10.3399/bjgp18X697877, pmid:29914879.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. McNab D,
    2. Freestone J,
    3. Black C,
    4. et al.
    (2018) Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the functional resonance analysis method. BMC Med 16 (1), doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1164-x, pmid:30305088. 174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Furniss D,
    2. Nelson D,
    3. Habli I,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Using FRAM to explore sources of performance variability in intravenous infusion administration in ICU: a non-normative approach to systems contradictions. Appl Ergon 86 103113, doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103113, pmid:32342897.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
    (2009) The EBD approach: experience based design: using patient and staff experience to design better healthcare services. accessed. https://www.england.nhs.uk/improvement-hub/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2017/11/Experience-Based-Design-Guide-and-Toolkit.pdf. 2 Sep 2024.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Robert G,
    2. Cornwell J,
    3. Locock L,
    4. et al.
    (2015) Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.g7714, pmid:25670179. g7714.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Donetto S,
    2. Pierri P,
    3. Tsianakas V,
    4. Robert G
    (2015) Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: realizing participatory design in the public sector. The Design Journal 18 (2):227–248, doi:10.2752/175630615X14212498964312.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Howard J
    (2007) On the origin of touchpoints. accessed. https://designforservice.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/on-the-origin-of-touchpoints. 2 Sep 2024.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jessup RL,
    2. Osborne RH,
    3. Buchbinder R,
    4. Beauchamp A
    (2018) Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population. BMC Health Serv Res 18 (1), doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3801-7, pmid:30572887. 989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bowen S,
    2. McSeveny K,
    3. Lockley E,
    4. et al.
    (2013) How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. CoDesign 9 (4):230–246, doi:10.1080/15710882.2013.846384.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
General practice management after transition events: protocol for an experience-based co-design study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
General practice management after transition events: protocol for an experience-based co-design study
Zakia Shariff, Jeremy Dale, Rachel Ann Spencer
BJGP Open 17 September 2024; BJGPO.2023.0244. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0244

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
General practice management after transition events: protocol for an experience-based co-design study
Zakia Shariff, Jeremy Dale, Rachel Ann Spencer
BJGP Open 17 September 2024; BJGPO.2023.0244. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0244
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • General Practice
  • transition
  • experience
  • decision making
  • Communication

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiovascular risk estimation and statin adherence: a historical cohort study protocol
  • Emergency admission Predictive RIsk Stratification Models: Assessment of Implementation Consequences (PRISMATIC 2): a protocol for a mixed-methods study
  • The paper study (prescribing antidepressants in primary care: ethnic inequalities in treatment). A study protocol
Show more Protocol

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795