Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Primary care clinicians’ perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review

Simon Briscoe, Jo Thompson Coon, G J Melendez-Torres, Rebecca Abbott, Liz Shaw, Michael Nunns and Ruth Garside
BJGP Open 15 November 2023; BJGPO.2023.0133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0133
Simon Briscoe
1 Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Thompson Coon
1 Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G J Melendez-Torres
1 Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Abbott
2 NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liz Shaw
1 Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Nunns
1 Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth Garside
1 Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Studies have found that women with gynaecological conditions and symptoms do not feel listened to by primary care clinicians. Less understood is whether primary care clinicians perceive that there are challenges around listening to and interacting with this patient group.

Aim This study aims to understand primary care clinicians’ perspectives on the challenges of listening to and interacting with women patients with gynaecological conditions and symptoms.

Design & setting Systematic review

Method We searched ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC and MEDLINE from inception to July 2023. We also conducted forward and backward citation searches of included studies. Identified records were screened independently by two reviewers. Data-extraction was undertaken by one reviewer and checked by a second. Quality appraisal used the Wallace checklist. “Best-fit” framework synthesis was used to synthesise findings around themes which explore the challenges of patient-clinician interaction.

Results We identified 25 relevant papers. Perceived challenges associated with listening to and interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions and symptoms were identified at four ‘levels’: Individual clinician factors; structural and organisational factors; community and external factors; and factors related to gynaecological conditions. Interpretive analysis identified specific challenges relating to socio-cultural factors affecting the consultation experience; the need for further education, training or guidance for clinicians; factors affecting referral decisions; and factors related to service structure and organisation.

Conclusions Primary care clinicians acknowledge that empathy, respect and attentive listening are important when interacting with women patients with gynaecological conditions and symptoms. However, these ideals are impeded by several factors.

  • Women’s health
  • systematic review
  • qualitative research
  • primary care
  • gynaecological conditions
  • Received July 17, 2023.
  • Revision received September 28, 2023.
  • Accepted November 10, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2023, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Next Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary care clinicians’ perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Primary care clinicians’ perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review
Simon Briscoe, Jo Thompson Coon, G J Melendez-Torres, Rebecca Abbott, Liz Shaw, Michael Nunns, Ruth Garside
BJGP Open 15 November 2023; BJGPO.2023.0133. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0133

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Primary care clinicians’ perspectives on interacting with patients with gynaecological conditions: a systematic review
Simon Briscoe, Jo Thompson Coon, G J Melendez-Torres, Rebecca Abbott, Liz Shaw, Michael Nunns, Ruth Garside
BJGP Open 15 November 2023; BJGPO.2023.0133. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0133
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • women’s health
  • systematic review
  • qualitative research
  • primary care
  • gynaecological conditions

More in this TOC Section

  • Adolescents talk about insufficient prevention through their general practitioner: A qualitative study
  • Diagnostic accuracy of CT in patients with non-specific symptoms of cancer referred directly to CT from general practice: a retrospective follow-up study
  • Impact of a comprehensive review template on personalised care in general practice for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795