Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
Research

Exploring the impact of the national extended access scheme on patient experience of and satisfaction with general practice: an observational study using the English GP Patient Survey

Patrick Burch and William Whittaker
BJGP Open 17 May 2022; BJGPO.2022.0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0013
Patrick Burch
1 National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patrick Burch
  • For correspondence: patrick.burch@manchester.ac.uk
William Whittaker
2 Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Timeline showing data collection points. GPPS = GP Patient Survey.
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Number of extended access days offered by practices

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Mean values for outcome variables for all practices included in the model (n = 5829)
    Question and variablesMean 2018, %Mean 2019, %Difference, %
    How often do you see or speak to your preferred GP when you would like to?a ‘Always or almost always‘ or ‘A lot of the time‘51.849.6–2.2b
    How satisfied are you with the general practice appointment times that are available to you? ‘Very satisfied‘ or ‘Fairly satisfied‘67.666.5–1.1b
    Overall, how would you describe your experience of your GP practice? ‘Very good’ or ‘Fairly good‘84.683.9–0.7b
    • aThis was asked to those patients with a preferred GP. b P<0.05

    • View popup
    Table 2. Source and average values for explanatory variables used in the analyses
    CategorySourceMean 2018Mean 2019Combined means
    Extended access days offered, nNHS England – practice submitted data3.464.413.94
    Patients registered with practice, nGPPS890986408775
    Male patients registered with practice, %GPPS49.249.249.2
    Prevalence of long-term conditions, %GPPS51.352.451.8
    FTE GPs per 1000 patients, nNHS Digital and GPPS0.540.500.52
    GPs per FTE GPs, nNHS Digital1.381.391.38
    Patients aged <5 years, %NHS Digital5.55.65.6
    Percentage of patients aged >75 years, %NHS Digital8.07.87.9
    • FTQ = full-time equivalent. GPPS = GP Patient Survey.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Type or location of external access offered by practices
    CategoryMarch 2017, % (n)March 2018, % (n)
    Practices with no extended access11.7 (684)10.8 (631)
    Practices with only internal extended access53.0 (3091)33.3 (1941)
    Practices with only external extended access6.4 (375)12.1 (704)
    Practices with both internal and external extended access28.7 (1675)43.8 (2553)
    • View popup
    Table 4. Regression outputs. N = 5829 practices. Estimates are from linear regression models and include practice fixed effects (not reported), standard errors are robust to heteroscedasticity.
    CategoryPercentage of patients satisfied with accessPercentage of patients able to speak to preferred GPPercentage of patients satisfied with overall experience
    Beta (95% CI)Beta (95% CI)Beta (95% CI)
    Number of extended access days0.0002(–0.0008 to 0.001)0.00003(–0.001 to 0.001)–0.0006(–0.001 to –0.0001)
    Percentage of male patients–0.17(–0.051 to 0.16)0.046a(0.002 to 0.90)–0.020(–0.046 to 0.007)
    Number of thousand patients–0.002a(–0.005 to –0.002)–0.003a(–0.005 to –0.0008)–0.003a(–0.004 to –0.0009)
    FTE GPs per thousand patients0.006(–0.011 to 0.023)0.018(–0.002 to 0.038)0.012(–0.0003 to 0.024)
    Percentage of patients aged <5 years0.007(–0.001 to 0.016)0.008(–0.004 to 0.020)0.0036(–0.003 to 0.010)
    Percentage of patients aged >75 years–0.002(–0.011 to 0.006)–0.0004(–0.001 to 0.011)–0.002(–0.008 to 0.005)
    Percentage of patients with long-term conditions0.023(–0.006 to 0.052)0.056a(0.017 to 0.095)0.010(–0.013 to 0.032)
    Year (2019)–0.012a(–0.015 to –0.009)–0.022a(–0.026 to –0.018)–0.006a(–0.009 to 0.004)
    • aP<0.05. FTE = full-time equivalent.

Supplementary Data

  • Burch_BJGPO.2022.0013_Supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring the impact of the national extended access scheme on patient experience of and satisfaction with general practice: an observational study using the English GP Patient Survey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Exploring the impact of the national extended access scheme on patient experience of and satisfaction with general practice: an observational study using the English GP Patient Survey
Patrick Burch, William Whittaker
BJGP Open 17 May 2022; BJGPO.2022.0013. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Exploring the impact of the national extended access scheme on patient experience of and satisfaction with general practice: an observational study using the English GP Patient Survey
Patrick Burch, William Whittaker
BJGP Open 17 May 2022; BJGPO.2022.0013. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0013
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Large database research
  • Practice organisation
  • continuity of patient care
  • patient satisfaction
  • general practice

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations: a qualitative interview study
  • High rates of anorectal chlamydia in women: a cross-sectional study in general practice
  • Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-COVID-19 pandemic qualitative research
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2022 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795