Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
Protocol

Why test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the primary care academic collaborative to explore the reasons for primary care testing

Alexander Burrell, Polly Duncan, Ian Bennett-Britton, Sam Hodgson, Samuel W D Merriel, Salman Waqar, Penny Whiting and Jessica Watson on behalf of the Primary Care Academic Collaborative (PACT)
BJGP Open 4 May 2022; BJGPO.2022.0017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017
Alexander Burrell
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Polly Duncan
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Bennett-Britton
2 Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sam Hodgson
2 Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sam Hodgson
Samuel W D Merriel
3 Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Samuel W D Merriel
Salman Waqar
4 Bristol Population Health Science Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Salman Waqar
Penny Whiting
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Watson
1 Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The number of blood tests done in primary care has been increasing over the last 20 years. Some estimates suggest that up to a quarter of these tests may not have been needed. This could lead to a cascade effect of further investigations, appointments, or referrals, as well as anxiety for patients, increased workload and costs to the health service. To better understand the impact and sequelae of blood tests on patients, we need to know why blood tests are requested and what is done with the results.

Aims To explore who orders blood tests and why, and how test results are actioned in primary care.

Design & Setting Retrospective audit of electronic health records in general practices across the UK.

Method The Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT), a UK-wide network of primary care health professionals, will be utilised to collect data from individual practices. PACT members will be asked to review the electronic health records of 50 patients who had recent blood tests in their practice, and manually extract anonymised data on who requested the test, the indication, the result, and subsequent actions. Data will also be collected from PACT members to assess the feasibility of the collaborative model.

Conclusion PACT offers a unique opportunity to extract clinical data which cannot otherwise be obtained. Understanding the indications for tests will help identify priority areas for research to optimise testing and patient safety in primary care.

  • Primary Health Care
  • General Practice
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Collaborative Research
  • Received February 8, 2022.
  • Revision received April 14, 2022.
  • Accepted April 26, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the primary care academic collaborative to explore the reasons for primary care testing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Why test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the primary care academic collaborative to explore the reasons for primary care testing
Alexander Burrell, Polly Duncan, Ian Bennett-Britton, Sam Hodgson, Samuel W D Merriel, Salman Waqar, Penny Whiting, Jessica Watson
BJGP Open 4 May 2022; BJGPO.2022.0017. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Why test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the primary care academic collaborative to explore the reasons for primary care testing
Alexander Burrell, Polly Duncan, Ian Bennett-Britton, Sam Hodgson, Samuel W D Merriel, Salman Waqar, Penny Whiting, Jessica Watson
BJGP Open 4 May 2022; BJGPO.2022.0017. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • general practice
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Collaborative Research

More in this TOC Section

  • Postal methods for monitoring HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review
  • Effectiveness of preconception care interventions in primary care: a systematic review protocol
Show more Protocol

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2022 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795