Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open accessibility statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial fellowships
    • Audio abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Outreach
    • Feedback
    • BJGP Life
    • Advertising
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Conference
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
Research

Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations

Stephanie Hughes, Jane Louise Vennik, Kirsten A Smith, Jennifer Bostock, Jeremy Howick, Christian Mallen, Paul Little, Mohana Ratnapalan, Emily Lyness, Geraldine M Leydon, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Leanne Morrison, Hazel A Everitt and Felicity L Bishop
BJGP Open 4 April 2022; BJGPO.2021.0221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221
Stephanie Hughes
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie Hughes
Jane Louise Vennik
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten A Smith
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Bostock
2 Policy Innovation & Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU): London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Howick
3 University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Mallen
4 Keele University, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Little
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohana Ratnapalan
5 University of Nottingham, Centre for Academic Primary Care, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mohana Ratnapalan
Emily Lyness
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geraldine M Leydon
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hajira Dambha-Miller
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leanne Morrison
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
6 Psychology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hazel A Everitt
1 University of Southampton, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felicity L Bishop
6 Psychology Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Practitioner expressions of optimism and empathy may improve treatment engagement, adherence and patient satisfaction but are not delivered consistently amidst the challenges of everyday clinical practice.

Aims To explore primary care practitioner (PCP) views about optimistic and empathic communication in consultations; and to identify behavioural, attitudinal and/or contextual issues likely to encourage or deter PCPs from practising such communication.

Design & setting Qualitative interview study with 20 PCPs (General Practitioners, Practice Nurses, Primary Care Physiotherapists).

Method Semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 PCPs. Data was analysed thematically.

Results A conceptual mismatch between optimism and patient expectations became apparent; when asked how PCPs communicate about the likely effects of a treatment answers were focussed around managing patient expectations. When prompted, it became clear PCPs were open to communicating optimistically with patients, but emphasised the need for realism. Concerns arose that patients may not be receptive to optimistic messages, especially when holding negative expectations. PCPs felt that expressing empathy is fundamental to all clinical consultations, noting that it can be challenging. Some PCPs worried that increasing expressions of empathy might increase their risk of clinician burnout and felt guilty about (appropriately) communicating empathy whilst maintaining some emotional distance.

Conclusion PCPs agreed expressing realistic optimism during consultations could aid communication and would constitute a novel change to practice. PCPs strive for clinical empathy but can struggle to manage emotional self-protection. Specific training to help PCPs express realistic optimism and empathy, and better utilise efficient non-verbal skills could help these issues.

  • Empathy
  • optimism
  • Primary Health Care
  • qualitative research
  • clinician-patient relationships
  • Received November 25, 2021.
  • Revision received March 7, 2022.
  • Accepted March 30, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations
Stephanie Hughes, Jane Louise Vennik, Kirsten A Smith, Jennifer Bostock, Jeremy Howick, Christian Mallen, Paul Little, Mohana Ratnapalan, Emily Lyness, Geraldine M Leydon, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Leanne Morrison, Hazel A Everitt, Felicity L Bishop
BJGP Open 4 April 2022; BJGPO.2021.0221. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Clinician views on optimism and empathy in primary care consultations
Stephanie Hughes, Jane Louise Vennik, Kirsten A Smith, Jennifer Bostock, Jeremy Howick, Christian Mallen, Paul Little, Mohana Ratnapalan, Emily Lyness, Geraldine M Leydon, Hajira Dambha-Miller, Leanne Morrison, Hazel A Everitt, Felicity L Bishop
BJGP Open 4 April 2022; BJGPO.2021.0221. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0221
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Empathy
  • optimism
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative research
  • clinician-patient relationships

More in this TOC Section

  • General practitioners’ communication skills in Nairobi, Kenya: A descriptive observational study
  • Physical activity promotion by GPs: a cross-sectional survey in England
  • How do UK general practice staff understand and manage pre-diabetes? A focus group study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2022 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795