Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Outreach
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • Conference
    • eLetters
    • Audio abstracts
  • RACE AND RACISM IN PRIMARY CARE
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Advertisement
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Outreach
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • Feedback
    • Alerts
    • Conference
    • eLetters
    • Audio abstracts
  • RACE AND RACISM IN PRIMARY CARE
Research

Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a case–control study

Sylvia J Hysong, Amber B Amspoker, Ashley M Hughes, Houston F Lester, Erica K Svojse, Kashif Khan, Praveen Mehta and Laura A Petersen
BJGP Open 9 February 2021; BJGPO.2020.0185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0185
Sylvia J Hysong
1Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
2Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sylvia J Hysong
Amber B Amspoker
2Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley M Hughes
3University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Houston F Lester
1Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
2Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica K Svojse
1Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kashif Khan
1Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
4Richmond VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinic, Richmond, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Praveen Mehta
5VA Great Lakes Health Care System, Westchester, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura A Petersen
1Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
2Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Coordination is critical to successful team-based healthcare. Most clinicians, however, are not trained in effective coordination or teamwork. Audit and feedback (A&F) could improve team coordination, if designed with teams in mind.

Aim We tested effectiveness of a multifaceted, A&F-plus-debrief intervention at improving coordination in primary-care teams, compared to controls.

Design & setting Case-control trial within U.S. Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.

Method We compared 34 primary-care teams selected from four geospaced hospitals to 34 administratively matched control teams. Intervention-arm teams received monthly A&F reports about key coordination behaviours and structured debriefings over 7 months. Control teams were followed exclusively via their clinical records. Outcome measures included a coordination composite and its component indicators (appointments starting on time, timely recall scheduling, emergency department utilisation, and electronic patient portal enrollment). Predictors included intervention arm, extent of exposure to intervention and degree of multiple-team membership.

Results Intervention teams did not significantly improve over control teams, even after adjusting for multiple-team membership. Follow-up analyses indicated cross-team variability in intervention fidelity; although all intervention teams received feedback reports, not all teams attended all debriefings. Compared to their respective baselines, teams with high debriefing exposure improved significantly. Teams with high debriefing exposure improved significantly more than teams with low exposure. Low exposure teams significantly increased patient portal enrollment.

Conclusion Team-based A&F including adequate reflection time can improve coordination; however, the effect is dose dependent. Consistency of debriefing appears more critical than proportion of team members attending a debriefing for ensuring implementation fidelity and effectiveness.

  • primary health care
  • audit and feedback
  • debriefs
  • team coordination
  • learning health system
  • embedded partnership research
  • quality of health care
  • Received December 21, 2020.
  • Accepted January 21, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a case–control study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accepted Manuscript
Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a case–control study
Sylvia J Hysong, Amber B Amspoker, Ashley M Hughes, Houston F Lester, Erica K Svojse, Kashif Khan, Praveen Mehta, Laura A Petersen
BJGP Open 9 February 2021; BJGPO.2020.0185. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accepted Manuscript
Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a case–control study
Sylvia J Hysong, Amber B Amspoker, Ashley M Hughes, Houston F Lester, Erica K Svojse, Kashif Khan, Praveen Mehta, Laura A Petersen
BJGP Open 9 February 2021; BJGPO.2020.0185. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0185
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • audit and feedback
  • debriefs
  • team coordination
  • learning health system
  • embedded partnership research
  • quality of health care

More in this TOC Section

  • Supporting bereavement and complicated grief in primary care: a realist review
  • Evaluating the delay prior to primary care presentation in patients with lung cancer: a cohort study
  • Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

@BJGPOpen's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2021 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795