Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Practice & Policy

The rise of the statins and the burdening inefficiencies in liver monitoring

Hashim Al-Gailani and Puneet Chadha
BJGP Open 1 April 2020; bjgpopen20X101066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101066
Hashim Al-Gailani
1 GP, Stockport CCG, Stockport, UK
MBBS MRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: h.al-gailani{at}nhs.net
Puneet Chadha
2 GP, Birmingham & Solihull CCG, Birmingham, UK
MBBS, MRCP, MRCGP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • cardiovascular disease
  • guidelines
  • family medicine
  • primary healthcare

The prescribing of statins in the NHS has risen significantly over the years. In England, prescription items for statins that were dispensed in 2017 had increased by approximately 26 million compared to a decade ago.1 The updated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance in 2014, which opened up statins to those with cardiovascular risk of 10–20%, is a likely contributing factor to the increase in the later part of the last decade. More recently, NHS England’s improvement review sets out a plan, part of the wider ‘NHS long term plan’, which aims to improve identification and management of raised cholesterol as well as expanding access to genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). More specifically, their vision includes statins becoming available through high street chemists. Thus, there is mounting evidence to suggest that statin prescribing is likely to increase further in the future, with an associated increase in liver monitoring.

Current NICE guidelines on cardiovascular disease recommends measurement of liver transaminase enzymes before starting a statin, within 3 months and at 12 months, but not again unless clinically indicated. An increase of alanine transaminase (ALT) greater or equal to three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) is associated with a greater risk of significant liver injury.2 Nevertheless, a study has shown that only 1% of participants had ‘clinically meaningful’ elevations in hepatic transaminases; that is, meeting threshold of 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN).3 This has been reflected in the updated NICE guidance with less frequent liver monitoring requirements.

Despite all the emphasis being on transaminases, most GPs in the NHS currently cannot request ALT testing alone. Instead, routine practice is to tick liver function tests (LFT) from the list when monitoring statins. A study has put this to the test and established a reduction of full LFT testing for those on statins by 24.3% if practitioners had access to ALT testing alone.4 This is a noteworthy result with huge cost implications when considering the huge rise in statin prescribing over the past decade. Furthermore, it will become more valuable when we take into account the NHS long term plan to improve outcomes in identifying and managing high cholesterol as well as FH.

In conclusion, we have highlighted the significant rise in statin prescribing in the past decade as well as the likely continued rise when considering updated NICE guidance which lowered the threshold and the NHS long term plan. It therefore becomes more important to be cost-effective when performing liver monitoring for these additional patients, while still meeting current guidance. It is also important to acknowledge the wider benefit to the patient in reducing the anxiety of additional blood tests.

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this article.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this article.

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received March 1, 2020.
  • Accepted March 13, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Connelly D
    (2018) Statins: the highs and the lows. The Pharmaceutical Journal 301(7917), doi:10.1211/PJ.2018.20205512. 157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bays H,
    2. Cohen DE,
    3. Chalasani N,
    4. et al.
    (2014) An assessment by the Statin Liver Safety Task Force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol 8(3 Suppl):S47–S57, doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2014.02.011, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24793441.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Naci H,
    2. Brugts J,
    3. Ades T
    (2013) Comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins: a study-level network meta-analysis of 246 955 participants from 135 randomized, controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 6(4):390–399, doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000071, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23838105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Homer K,
    2. Robson J,
    3. Solaiman S,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Reducing liver function tests for statin monitoring: an observational comparison of two clinical commissioning groups. Br J Gen Pract 67(656):e194–e200, doi:10.3399/bjgp17X689365, pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28137784.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Next Article

Latest Articles

Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The rise of the statins and the burdening inefficiencies in liver monitoring
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The rise of the statins and the burdening inefficiencies in liver monitoring
Hashim Al-Gailani, Puneet Chadha
BJGP Open 1 April 2020; bjgpopen20X101066. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101066

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The rise of the statins and the burdening inefficiencies in liver monitoring
Hashim Al-Gailani, Puneet Chadha
BJGP Open 1 April 2020; bjgpopen20X101066. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101066
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • Guidelines
  • family medicine
  • primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • Artificial intelligence-driven exercise programmes in personalising the management of multimorbidity
  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2024: an editorial
  • The overlooked challenges facing out-of-hours primary care in the NHS: a missed opportunity in policy
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795