Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Urinary tract infection in outpatients in Germany: a cross-sectional study of diagnostics and susceptibility testing in medical laboratories

Hannah Bender, Kathrin Jobski, Guido Schmiemann, Axel Hamprecht and Falk Hoffmann
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (4): BJGPO.2025.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0004
Hannah Bender
1 Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hannah.bender{at}uni-oldenburg.de
Kathrin Jobski
1 Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Schmiemann
2 Department of Health Services Research, University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Hamprecht
3 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Falk Hoffmann
1 Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Flowchart of the survey process. SHI = statutory health insurance.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Flowchart of the survey process. SHI = statutory health insurance.
  • List of the 20 most frequently tested antibiotics. Antibiotics tested, n = 106. aAdditional antibiotic not listed in the questionnaire.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. List of the 20 most frequently tested antibiotics. Antibiotics tested, n = 106. aAdditional antibiotic not listed in the questionnaire.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population
    Characteristic Total, N = 258, n (%) Performing susceptibility tests, n (%)
    Yes, n = 106 No, n = 152
    Federal statea 253 101 152
    Baden-Wuerttemberg11 (4.3)9 (8.9)2 (1.3)
    Bavaria20 (7.9)13 (12.9)7 (4.6)
    Berlin10 (4.0)1 (1.0)9 (5.9)
    Brandenburg17 (6.7)4 (4.0)13 (8.6)
    Hamburg12 (4.7)5 (5.0)7 (4.6)
    Hesse21 (8.3)8 (7.9)13 (8.6)
    Lower Saxony27 (10.7)12 (11.9)15 (9.9)
    Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania19 (7.5)5 (5.0)14 (9.2)
    North Rhine-Westphalia52 (20.6)20 (19.8)32 (21.1)
    Rhineland-Palatinate13 (5.1)4 (4.0)9 (5.9)
    Saarland4 (1.6)2 (2.0)2 (1.3)
    Saxony20 (7.9)8 (7.9)12 (7.9)
    Saxony-Anhalt11 (4.3)5 (5.0)6 (3.9)
    Schleswig-Holstein7 (2.8)2 (2.0)5 (3.3)
    Thuringia9 (3.6)3 (3.0)6 (3.9)
    Participation by medium 258 106 152
    Telephone198 (76.7)48 (45.3)150 (98.7)
    Email51 (19.8)49 (46.2)2 (1.3)
    Fax9 (3.5)9 (8.5)0 (0.0)
    • a n = 5 practices did not provide federal state.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Characteristics of laboratories performing susceptibility testing for outpatient urinary tract infections
    Characteristicn (%)a
    Testing standard used, n = 105b
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute5 (4.8)
    European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing101 (96.2)
    National Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Committee59 (56.2)
    Other1 (1.0)
    Bacterial count limit used, n = 106 b
    10² CFU/ml16 (15.1)
    10³ CFU/ml54 (50.9)
    10⁴ CFU/ml21 (19.8)
    Use of bacterial count ≥105 CFU/ml5 (4.7)
    Bacterial count limit based on inhibiting test5 (4.7)
    Bacterial count limit based on detection of leukocytes4 (3.8)
    Bacterial count limit based on the type or number of pathogens that are detected3 (2.8)
    Bacterial count limit based on the sender’s requirements2 (1.9)
    Deviation from the previously listed standard of susceptibility tests, n = 104
    Yes84 (80.8)
    No20 (19.2)
    Description of situations in which deviating susceptibility tests are performed, n = 82b
    Detection of (multidrug-)resistant pathogens56 (68.3)
    Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria31 (37.8)
    Detection of other pathogens8 (9.8)
    Sender request26 (31.7)
    Special patient groups11 (13.4)
    Inpatients5 (6.1)
    Children3 (3.7)
    Desired information accompanying the urine sample, n = 101 b
    Clinical information or special features57 (56.4)
    Pregnancy13 (12.9)
    Immunosuppression8 (7.9)
    Antibiotic (pre)treatment56 (55.4)
    Information on the material or type of urine sample46 (45.5)
    Catheter urine20 (19.8)
    Diagnosis or suspected diagnosis29 (28.7)
    Leukocyte detection or leukocyturia19 (18.8)
    Exact date of urine collection8 (7.9)
    Other4 (4.0)
    Estimated proportion of urine samples with indication of the type of urine, n = 99
    Mean (SD)63.7 (37.0)
    Median (IQR)80.0 (20.0–95.0)
    Estimated proportion of urine samples with indication of pretreatment, n = 96
    Mean (SD)21.3 (23.4)
    Median (IQR)10.0 (5.0–30.0)
    Estimated proportion of urine samples with information on concomitant diseases, n = 100
    Mean (SD)21.5 (24.5)
    Median (IQR)10.0 (5.0–30.0)
    • aUnless otherwise stated. bMultiple answers possible. IQR = interquartile range. SD = standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Antibiotic testing for outpatient urinary tract infections in German laboratories (N = 106)10,11
    Category n (%)a
    Number of antibiotics tested per laboratory
     6–9 antibiotics tested16 (15.1)
     10–13 antibiotics tested40 (37.7)
     14–17 antibiotics tested40 (37.7)
     ≥18 antibiotics tested10 (9.4)
     Mean (SD)13.1 (3.6)
     Median (IQR)13.0 (11.0–15.0)
    Number of antibiotics tested per laboratory recommended in the guidelinesb
     0 recommended antibiotics tested1 (0.9)
     1 recommended antibiotic tested4 (3.8)
     2 recommended antibiotics tested11 (10.4)
     3 recommended antibiotics tested15 (14.2)
     4 recommended antibiotics tested47 (44.3)
     5 recommended antibiotics tested28 (26.4)
     Mean (SD)3.8 (1.1)
     Median (IQR)4.0 (3.0–5.0)
    • aUnless otherwise stated. bThe two valid guidelines10,11 at the time of data collection recommend as first-line treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infections fosfomycin trometamol, nitrofurantoin, nitroxoline, pivmecillinam, and trimethoprim, with local resistance rates of <20%. IQR = interquartile range. SD = standard deviation.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 4
December 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urinary tract infection in outpatients in Germany: a cross-sectional study of diagnostics and susceptibility testing in medical laboratories
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Urinary tract infection in outpatients in Germany: a cross-sectional study of diagnostics and susceptibility testing in medical laboratories
Hannah Bender, Kathrin Jobski, Guido Schmiemann, Axel Hamprecht, Falk Hoffmann
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (4): BJGPO.2025.0004. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Urinary tract infection in outpatients in Germany: a cross-sectional study of diagnostics and susceptibility testing in medical laboratories
Hannah Bender, Kathrin Jobski, Guido Schmiemann, Axel Hamprecht, Falk Hoffmann
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (4): BJGPO.2025.0004. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0004
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • LinkedIn logo LinkedIn
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • Bluesky logo Bluesky

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • urinary tract infections
  • outpatients
  • antimicrobial stewardship
  • guideline adherence
  • health services research
  • primary health care

More in this TOC Section

  • General practice organisation in France: ecological analysis of mortality and life expectancy
  • General practitioners’ perspectives on suicide prevention in primary care: a qualitative study
  • Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a primary care consultation tool: a pilot controlled trial
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795