Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Practice & Policy

Artificial intelligence-driven exercise programmes in personalising the management of multimorbidity

Jacob Keast, Glenn Simpson, Lucy Smith and Hajira Dambha-Miller
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2025.0094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0094
Jacob Keast
1 University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jacob Keast
  • For correspondence: jakekeast1{at}outlook.com
Glenn Simpson
2 Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Glenn Simpson
Lucy Smith
2 Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lucy Smith
Hajira Dambha-Miller
2 Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hajira Dambha-Miller
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • artificial intelligence
  • exercise programme
  • multimorbidity
  • general practitioners
  • primary healthcare

Multimorbidity, the presence of two or more chronic conditions, presents significant challenges in health care. Multimorbidity affects over 25% of UK adults and is a growing global challenge, contributing substantially to disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and healthcare costs.1 Long-term conditions, which frequently co-occur, now account for over 70% of global DALYs, underscoring the urgency of scalable, cost-effective interventions.2 Individuals with multimorbidity often struggle with complex treatment regimens, multiple medications, and care plans tailored to each condition, leading to fragmented care that may not address their overall health needs.3 Exercise is an important component in the management of chronic conditions, although there is a significant challenge in designing personalised approaches to accommodate the unique combination of health conditions a patient faces. Limitations of standardised exercise referral schemes include limited adaptability to individual progress, low adherence rates, and a lack of contextual personalisation4,5 Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven exercise programmes offer a promising solution, providing tailored and adaptable plans that respond to the specific needs of populations affected by multimorbidity. AI coaching models have a well-established presence in the sports industry; examples include TrainerRoad and Tri-Dot, which optimise training plans with feedback and review from each session’s outcomes.6 These models, developed over a decade, offer high quality, data-driven solutions that improve performance and engagement. For chronic health conditions, AI can similarly optimise exercise plans based on patients’ needs. For example, individuals with diabetes benefit from a mixed training approach with a preference for high-intensity efforts that stimulate hypertrophy and improve muscle glucose uptake, enhancing insulin sensitivity. Exercise has also been shown to improve pulmonary function and exercise tolerance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).7 In people with osteoarthritis and type 2 diabetes, structured aerobic and resistance training is associated with reduced joint stiffness and significant decreases in HbA₁c levels.8–10 This personalisation represents a significant advancement in exercise for chronic disease management compared with current models.

Additionally, in managing chronic diseases, exercise plays a central role in the improvement of cardiovascular health, reducing blood glucose levels, strengthening muscles, and alleviating joint pain.11 However, to achieve this, the regimen for individuals with multimorbidity must be tailored to their unique health profile. A one-size-fits-all approach may not always be appropriate, as each condition requires distinct considerations. For example, a patient with both diabetes and osteoarthritis requires an exercise programme addressing cardiovascular health and joint pain relief. Where the aforementioned high-intensity exercise is beneficial in diabetes, a lower impact or more targeted programme may be necessary for osteoarthritis. Further, an exercise programme may also account for a patient’s personal characteristics and their wider environment, such as age, sex, socioeconomic circumstances, and other factors . AI-driven exercise programmes can optimise these plans by leveraging data to create safe, effective regimens suited to each condition and to an individual’s personal context. AI’s ability to dynamically adapt exercise programmes is a key feature that sets it apart from traditional approaches. AI-driven exercise platforms can dynamically adjust activity recommendations based on real-time physiological feedback, for example, modifying training intensity in response to heart rate variability deviations from baseline or adapting exercise load based on wearables-driven VO₂ max estimates.12,13 Conventional exercise plans are static, unable to respond to changes in a patient’s health state or fitness level. AI systems, however, monitor key health and exercise metrics, adjusting intensity based on patient feedback and tracked data. For example, if a patient over-exerts themselves one day, a plan can reduce subsequent session intensity to allow for improved recovery and long-term benefits. Over time, exercise plans can ensure continuous adaptation and health improvements, enabling safe, effective, and evolving exercise regimens.14,15

Adherence to physical activity is a significant challenge for individuals with chronic conditions. By personalising the intensity and type of exercise, AI-driven programmes make physical activity more accessible and engaging. This approach, combined with real-time feedback and progress tracking, may increase the likelihood that individuals continue with their exercise plans.16 Wearable devices integrated with AI platforms provide timely updates on progress, celebrate milestones, and issue reminders, thus maintaining patient motivation. This level of engagement is especially important for populations with multimorbidity, who may require additional support. While AI can deliver personalised exercise programmes, human interaction remains essential for accountability and engagement. Health coaches play pivotal roles in supporting patients by monitoring progress, providing guidance, and ensuring adherence to the programme.17 The combination of AI-generated plans and human oversight promotes sustained engagement and improves health outcomes, with potential for improved service capacity. Features such as check-ins, messaging, goal setting, and peer-to-peer support functions help maintain adherence and foster a sense of community among individuals with similar health challenges.17

AI-powered exercise programmes also offer significant benefits in terms of accessibility and scalability. For instance, tailored cardiac rehabilitation programmes could increase the breadth of conditions included for rehabilitation, as well as aiding those in rural areas who struggle to access in-person services. AI-powered interventions provide these patients with the support they need to engage in exercise, improving health outcomes. These systems, available via web apps and other devices, offer a flexible and accessible alternative for individuals unable to attend rehabilitation sessions due to mobility or travel constraints. From an operational standpoint, AI-driven exercise programmes can address capacity issues within healthcare systems, for example, long waiting lists for Tier 3 weight management services in the UK create a backlog of patients.18 AI exercise prescription software can provide an initial low-level intervention to improve service delivery without overwhelming healthcare systems. Moreover, it can bridge the gap in specialist expertise by enabling general health coaches, such as Level 2 fitness instructors, to facilitate exercise plans, reducing the reliance on specialist trainers.

The potential of AI-driven exercise programmes extends beyond physical health to address mental health. Individuals with multimorbidity often experience anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. These systems can integrate mental health support within exercise programmes, recommending stress-reducing activities such as yoga or mindfulness exercises alongside more physically demanding tasks. This holistic approach fosters both physical and emotional wellbeing, improving overall chronic disease management.

In the future, AI-driven exercise programmes could offer revolutionary chronic condition management by providing truly personalised and scalable solutions. Iterating algorithms over time can increase plan resolution, or scope, by adapting to additional health conditions and medications, expanding their applicability across clinical areas within the NHS. For example, the NHS GP Exercise Referral Scheme currently advises on activity for 13 long-term health conditions, but similar exercise principles can be developed and applied for cardiac rehabilitation, fitness for surgery, pulmonary rehabilitation, obesity clinics, falls prevention, and more. AI-informed exercise platforms, such as VITOVA, Sweatcoin, EXi, MyRecovery, Kaido, Changing Health, and AMP (Advanced Movement Programming), use various algorithms to personalise exercise plans based on health conditions, or medications, and/or patient-derived goals.10 Future iterations incorporating generative AI and machine learning models can further optimise these plans, enhancing and informing chronic disease management.

Through continuous monitoring, real-time adjustments, and bespoke support, these systems address key challenges in chronic disease management, ultimately improving health, quality of life, and long-term prognoses. The clinical implications are substantial: AI and exercise prescription software have the potential to revolutionise exercise support through scalable, cost-effective, and personalised interventions that can be adapted for diverse patient populations, yielding profound improvements in chronic disease management. While some GP practices have begun to adopt these platforms, large-scale evaluations are essential to confirm their efficacy and optimise software integration within healthcare systems. Moreover, NHS collaboration with commercial industry partners in AI-informed physical activity will be critical to rapidly scale and implement these technologies, ensuring broad accessibility and maximising the positive impacts on chronic health condition management going forward. Finally, to support implementation at scale, future integration of AI-enabled platforms into NHS pathways should be accompanied by economic modelling, including cost-effectiveness analyses and return-on-investment projections, to strengthen the case for sustainable adoption.

Notes

Funding

HDM has received funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research - the Artificial Intelligence for Multiple Long-Term Conditions, or "AIM". ’The development and validation of population clusters for integrating health and social care: A mixed-methods study on multiple long-term conditions’ (NIHR202637); receives funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research ‘Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) Cross NIHR Collaboration (CNC)’ (NIHR207000); and receives funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research ‘Developing and optimising an intervention prototype for addressing health and social care need in multimorbidity’ (NIHR206431). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Ethical approval

N/A

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Data

N/A

Competing interests

HDM is the Editor-in-Chief of BJGP Open; she had no role in the decisionmaking on this manuscript. JK is the CEO of VITOVA, an AI exercise prescription for healthcare start-up company.

  • Received May 12, 2025.
  • Revision received July 9, 2025.
  • Accepted July 11, 2025.
  • Copyright © 2025, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barnett K,
    2. Mercer SW,
    3. Norbury M,
    4. et al.
    (2012) Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet 380 (9836):37–43, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Vos T,
    2. Lim SS,
    3. Abbafati C,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. The Lancet 396 (10258):1204–1222, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dekker J,
    2. Buurman BM,
    3. van der Leeden M
    (2019) Exercise in people with comorbidity or multimorbidity. Health Psychol 38 (9):822–830, doi:10.1037/hea0000750, pmid:31021125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Morgan F,
    2. Battersby A,
    3. Weightman AL,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. BMC Public Health 16 (1):1–11, doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2882-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pavey TG,
    2. Taylor AH,
    3. Fox KR,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d6462, pmid:22058134. d6462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Clay B
    (2025) How TrainerRoad builds adaptive training plans for you [TrainerRoad blog]. accessed. https://www.trainerroad.com/blog/how-trainerroad-plans-are-built-and-adapt-to-you/. 10 Sep 2025.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Zhang Z,
    3. Du Z,
    4. Zhai F
    (2024) Mind–body exercise for patients with stable COPD on lung function and exercise capacity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rcts. Sci Rep 14 (1):1–13, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-69394-4, pmid:39112599. 18300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sigal RJ,
    2. Kenny GP,
    3. Boulé NG,
    4. et al.
    (2007) Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 147 (6):357–369, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00005, pmid:17876019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Gholami F,
    2. Naderi A,
    3. Saeidpour A,
    4. Lefaucheur JP
    (2024) Effect of exercise training on glycemic control in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Prim Care Diabetes 18 (2):109–118, doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2024.01.008, pmid:38286719. S1751-9918(24)00008-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gregg E,
    2. Jakicic J,
    3. Blackburn G,
    4. et al.
    (2016) Association of the magnitude of weight loss and changes in physical fitness with long-term cardiovascular disease outcomes in overweight or obese people with type 2 diabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the look AHEAD randomised clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4 (11):913–921, doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30162-0, pmid:27595918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Barker K,
    2. Holland AE,
    3. Skinner EH,
    4. Lee AL
    (2023) Clinical outcomes following exercise rehabilitation in people with multimorbidity: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 55 doi:10.2340/jrm.v55.2551, pmid:36876460. 2551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Düking P,
    2. Robertson S,
    3. Holmberg H-C,
    4. et al.
    (2024) Classification system for AI-enabled consumer-grade wearable technologies aiming to automatize decision-making about individualization of exercise procedures. Front Sports Act Living 6 doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1500563, pmid:39945004. 1500563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Spathis D,
    2. Perez-Pozuelo I,
    3. Gonzales TI,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Longitudinal cardio-respiratory fitness prediction through wearables in free-living environments. NPJ Digit Med 5 (1):176, doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00719-1, pmid:36460766.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Weber F,
    2. Kloek C,
    3. Stuhrmann S,
    4. et al.
    (2024) Usability and preliminary effectiveness of an app-based physical activity and education program for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis - a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 26 (1), doi:10.1186/s13075-024-03291-z, pmid:38600607. 83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Oh YJ,
    3. Lange P,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Artificial intelligence chatbot behavior change model for designing artificial intelligence chatbots to promote physical activity and a healthy diet: viewpoint. J Med Internet Res 22 (9), doi:10.2196/22845, pmid:32996892. e22845.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Brickwood K-J,
    2. Watson G,
    3. O’Brien J,
    4. Williams AD
    (2019) Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7 (4), doi:10.2196/11819, pmid:30977740. e11819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Potempa K,
    2. Calarco M,
    3. Flaherty-Robb M,
    4. et al.
    (2017) A randomized trial of a theory-driven model of health coaching for older adults: short-term and sustained outcomes. BMC Prim Care 24 (1):1–14, doi:10.1186/s12875-023-02162-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hanson P,
    2. Summers C,
    3. Panesar A
    (2018) Implementation of a digital health tool for patients awaiting input from a specialist weight management team: observational study. JMIR Hum Factors 10 doi:10.2196/41256. e41256.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 3
October 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Artificial intelligence-driven exercise programmes in personalising the management of multimorbidity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Artificial intelligence-driven exercise programmes in personalising the management of multimorbidity
Jacob Keast, Glenn Simpson, Lucy Smith, Hajira Dambha-Miller
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2025.0094. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0094

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Artificial intelligence-driven exercise programmes in personalising the management of multimorbidity
Jacob Keast, Glenn Simpson, Lucy Smith, Hajira Dambha-Miller
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2025.0094. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0094
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • exercise programme
  • multimorbidity
  • general practitioners
  • primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • Artificial intelligence in primary care: opportunities, risks, and the road ahead
  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2024: an editorial
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795