Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Influence of GPs’ unhealthy lifestyle on patients’ adherence to lifestyle recommendations: a cross-sectional study in Belgian primary care

Julie Kerremans and Birgitte Schoenmakers
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0221
Julie Kerremans
1 Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Birgitte Schoenmakers
1 Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Birgitte Schoenmakers
  • For correspondence: Birgitte.schoenmakers{at}kuleuven.be
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Responder characteristics
    Characteristic% (n/N)Median (IQR)
    Gender   
    Woman73.2 (342/466) 
    Man26.1 (122/466) 
    Non-binary or third gender0.4 (2/466) 
    Age, years  26 (21.5)
    Subjective physical health  8/10 (1)
    Subjective mental health  7/10 (1)
    • IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Need for lifestyle advice
    Need for adviceMedian (IQR)
    Smoking cessation0/10 (0)
    Alcohol use0/10 (2)
    Vaccination1/10 (5)
    Eating habits5/10 (5)
    Physical activity5/10 (6)
    Sleep hygiene and rest5/10 (5)
    Stress and relaxation6/10 (5)
    Other0/10 (0)
    • IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Influence of GPs’ unhealthy lifestyle on adherence and feeling of judgement
    Category, % (n/N)AdherenceFeeling of judgement
    MoreLessNo
    influence
    MoreLessNo influence
    AdviceSmoking cessationUnhealthy lifestyle of GPSmoking5.4
    (25/466)
    62.3
    (291/466)
    32.3
    (151/466)
    11.6
    (54/465)
    41.1
    (191/465)
    47.3
    (220/465)
    Alcohol useAlcohol misuse3.2
    (15/466)
    64.9
    (303/466)
    31.9
    (149/466)
    VaccinationUnvaccinated3.9
    (18/466)
    49.7
    (232/466)
    46.5
    (217/466)
    Eating habitsOverweight4.3
    (20/466)
    51.2
    (239/466)
    44.5
    (208/466)
    Physical activityPhysically inactive2.6
    (12/466)
    33.0
    (154/466)
    64.5
    (301/466)
    Sleep hygiene and restSeverely tired9.0
    (42/466)
    28.3
    (132/466)
    62.7
    (293/466)
    Stress and relaxationPoor work–life balance9.6
    (45/466)
    34.0
    (159/466)
    56.3
    (263/466)
    Feeling of judgement16.1
    (74/461)
    68.8
    (317/461)
    15.2
    (70/461)
       
    • Bold = P<0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Influence of responder characteristics on less adherence and more feeling of judgement
    CategoryLess adherence versus no influence, OR (95% CI)More feeling of judgement versus no influence
    Smoking
    cessation
    Alcohol useVaccinationEating habitsPhysical activitySleep hygiene and restStress and
    relaxation
    Feeling of judgement
    Gender0.665
    (0.423 to 1.046)
    P = 0.077
    1.352
    (0.873 to 2.094)
    P = 0.177
    1.269
    (0.837 to 1.926)
    P = 0.262
    0.758
    (0.501 to 1.148)
    P = 0.191
    1.026
    (0.665 to 1.583)
    P = 0.907
    0.881
    (0.558 to 1.390)
    P = 0.586
    1.044
    (0.670 to 1.625)
    P = 0.849
    1.761
    (1.009 to 3.073)
    P = 0.047
    0.984
    (0.507 to 1.911)
    P = 0.963
    Age 0.979
    (0.966 to 0.992)
    P = 0.002
    0.983
    (0.970 to 0.996)
    P = 0.008
    0.975
    (0.963 to 0.989)
    P<0.001
    0.988
    (0.976 to 1.001)
    P = 0.066
    0.996
    (0.983 to 1.009)
    P = 0.545
    0.999
    (0.985 to 1.013)
    P = 0.880
    1.001
    (0.988 to 1.015)
    P = 0.847
    0.973
    (0.957 to 0.998)
    P = 0.001
    1.004
    (0.985 to 1.023)
    P = 0.677
    Subjective physical health0.976
    (0.829 to 1.149)
    P = 0.768
    1.094
    (0.930 to 1.287)
    P = 0.277
    0.959
    (0.821 to 1.121)
    P = 0.602
    0.930
    (0.795 to 1.089)
    P = 0.367
    0.799
    (0.677 to 0.942)
    P = 0.008
    0.859
    (0.727 to 1.015)
    P = 0.073
    0.934
    (0.797 to 1.095)
    P = 0.399
    0.986
    (0.791 to 1.227)
    P = 0.897
    0.819
    (0.653 to 1.026)
    P = 0.082
    Subjective mental health1.008
    (0.866 to 1.174)
    P = 0.918
    0.929
    (0.797 to 1.083)
    P = 0.345
    0.928
    (0.803 to 1.071)
    P = 0.307
    0.972
    (0.844 to 1.119)
    P = 0.689
    1.053
    (0.908 to 1.220)
    P = 0.494
    0.997
    (0.854 to 1.164) P = 0.972
    0.926
    (0.797 to 1.075)
    P = 0.313
    0.873
    (0.704 to 1.082)
    P = 0.214
    0.928
    (0.747 to 1.152)
    P = 0.496
    Need for advice0.973
    (0.900 to 1.053)
    P = 0.502
    1.033
    (0.948 to 1.124)
    P = 0.459
    1.000
    (0.940 to 1.063)
    P = 0.997
    0.960
    (0.900 to 1.024)
    P = 0.213
    0.955
    (0.893 to 1.021)
    P = 0.175
    0.995
    (0.928 to 1.066)
    P = 0.879
    1.004
    (0.939 to 1.075)
    P = 0.899
    • Bold = P<0.05. OR = odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Influence of responder characteristics on more adherence and less feeling of judgement
    CategoryMore adherence versus no influence, OR (95% CI)Less feeling of judgement versus no influence
    Smoking
    cessation
    Alcohol useVaccinationEating habitsPhysical activitySleep hygiene and restStress and
    relaxation
    Feeling of judgement
    Gender1.095
    (0.433 to 2.767)
    P = 0.848
    2.623
    (0.763 to 9.018)
    P = 0.126
    1.795
    (0.587 to 5.488)
    P = 0.305
    1.109
    (0.388 to 3.173)
    P = 0.846
    1.573
    (0.416 to 5.944)
    P = 0.504
    0.703
    (0.348 to 1.417)
    P = 0.324
    1.456
    (0.701 to 3.022)
    P = 0.314
    1.395
    (0.700 to 2.782)
    P = 0.344
    1.029
    (0.668 to 1.585)
    P = 0.896
    Age1.012
    (0.986 to 1.039)
    P = 0.361
    1.013
    (0.981 to 1.046)
    P = 0.429
    1.025
    (0.996 to 1.054)
    P = 0.088
    1.010
    (0.982 to 1.039)
    P = 0.474
    1.022
    (0.988 to 1.058)
    P = 0.212
    0.994
    (0.972 to 1.016)
    P = 0.567
    0.998
    (0.976 to 1.020)
    P = 0.842
    0.987
    (0.968 to 1.007)
    P = 0.198
    0.976
    (0.962 to 0.990)
    P = 0.001
    Subjective physical health1.170
    (0.801 to 1.708)
    P = 0.417
    1.329
    (0.825 to 2.142)
    P = 0.243
    0.804
    (0.558 to 1.157)
    P = 0.240
    0.894
    (0.622 to 1.284)
    P = 0.545
    0.913
    (0.565 to 1.475)
    P = 0.710
    0.890
    (0.682 to 1.161)
    P = 0.389
    1.044
    (0.795 to 1.371)
    P = 0.757
    1.094
    (0.827 to 1.447)
    P = 0.528
    0.965
    (0.820 to 1.137)
    P = 0.672
    Subjective mental health0.914
    (0.657 to 1.272)
    P = 0.594
    0.838
    (0.556 to 1.265)
    P = 0.401
    1.135
    (0.755 to 1.707)
    P = 0.542
    1.005
    (0.706 to 1.432)
    P = 0.977
    1.017
    (0.649 to 1.591)
    P = 0.943
    1.270
    (0.967 to 1.668)
    P = 0.085
    1.171
    (0.895 to 1.534)
    P = 0.250
    0.968
    (0.741 to 1.265)
    P = 0.812
    1.017
    (0.877 to 1.179)
    P = 0.825
    Need for advice1.110
    (0.972 to 1.268)
    P = 0.123
    1.167
    (0.963 to 1.414)
    P = 0.114
    0.970
    (0.828 to 1.135)
    P = 0.702
    1.004
    (0.859 to 1.173)
    P = 0.962
    1.005
    (0.830 to 1.217)
    P = 0.955
    1.075
    (0.962 to 1.202)
    P = 0.202
    1.005
    (0.903 to 1.120)
    P = 0.921
    • Bold = P<0.05. OR = odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 6. Free comments
    ConceptsMentions, n
    Role model function of the GP11
    Own responsibility for health8
    Appreciation for medical advice6
    Unclearness of questions6
    Unknown lifestyle of the GP5
    Limited time and attention during consultations5
    Understanding approach5
    Subject-dependent assessment4
    Change of GP3
    Respect for privacy and professional boundaries3
    Doubt about the competence and expertise of GPs2
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 3
October 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of GPs’ unhealthy lifestyle on patients’ adherence to lifestyle recommendations: a cross-sectional study in Belgian primary care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Influence of GPs’ unhealthy lifestyle on patients’ adherence to lifestyle recommendations: a cross-sectional study in Belgian primary care
Julie Kerremans, Birgitte Schoenmakers
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0221. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0221

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Influence of GPs’ unhealthy lifestyle on patients’ adherence to lifestyle recommendations: a cross-sectional study in Belgian primary care
Julie Kerremans, Birgitte Schoenmakers
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0221. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0221
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • general practitioners
  • lifestyle
  • patient adherence
  • patient compliance
  • primary care

More in this TOC Section

  • Adolescents talk about insufficient prevention through their general practitioner: A qualitative study
  • Diagnostic accuracy of CT in patients with non-specific symptoms of cancer referred directly to CT from general practice: a retrospective follow-up study
  • Impact of a comprehensive review template on personalised care in general practice for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795