Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

General practice specialty decision making: a system-level Australian qualitative study

Faith R Yong, Priya Martin, Katharine A Wallis, Jordan Fox, Sneha Kirubakaran, Riitta L Partanen, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan and Matthew R McGrail
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0218
Faith R Yong
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Faith R Yong
Priya Martin
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
2 School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Priya Martin
Katharine A Wallis
3 General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Katharine A Wallis
Jordan Fox
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jordan Fox
Sneha Kirubakaran
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sneha Kirubakaran
Riitta L Partanen
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Riitta L Partanen
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan
Matthew R McGrail
1 Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew R McGrail
  • For correspondence: m.mcgrail{at}uq.edu.au
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Illustrative GP quotes relevant to Xu’s dual-process theory of career decision-making (DTC) framework constructs
    Framework constructDefinitionQuote
    DTC framework 28
    (1) Anchor choicesIntermediate choices that provide career direction, e.g. medical versus surgical, preferencing specialties or not, case variety, location, or community “I did a rotation in PGPPP [Prevocational General Practice Placements Program] in my second year out, which was a very positive experience. I really enjoyed that. I think that that’s a significant part of why I decided to go into general practice.” (GP5)
    (2) Agentic adjustmentAdjustment of initial career choice based on feedback, using critical self-reflection and career adaptability (that is, concerns about the future, curiosity in exploration, internal sense of control, coping confidence) “[…] a few of my colleagues are leaving general practice now and it’s because they’re burnt out from always bending over backwards trying to accommodate things, so I think you do have to find that sweet point between flexibility and where your boundaries have to be firmer. But if you find that then general practice is great.” (GP6)
    (3) Strategic planningNon-linear, intentional style of career design with holistic, long-term oriented goals by the individual “[…] but all the time – if someone has started obstetrics training and then halfway through they said, ‘You know what, too many night shifts. I want to have a family. My partner earns enough money. I don’t need to work as a surgeon and, you know what, it’s too hard on my – I want to have kids and it’s not good for my training program. I’m going to leave. I’m going to become a GP.’” (GP9)
    (4) Managing ambiguityHow the individual self-manages thoughts about their career choice which they are not able to confirm or disconfirm before trying it out personally “[…] for that longer length of placement, it was definitely, ‘Yes, if general practice is your path, great. Follow it. If general practice really isn’t your path, great. Follow that.’ The others kind of still figure their own way out.” (GP13)
     (4a) SatisficingSettling for a choice as ‘good enough’ by approaching and making attempts to understand any ambiguity, and acknowledging any ambiguity is acceptable “I think the number one challenge is – I mean for me it probably didn’t – I guess there was still that kind of lack of ‘I don’t really know what it is to be a GP,’ because you don’t have that exposure. I think that what that was still a challenge because I didn’t – I hadn’t had that kind of personal experience.” (GP1)
     (4b) MaximisingApproaching ambiguity by exhausting decision-making resources and efforts, and denying any ambiguity can exist “I narrowed it down till I was choosing between general practice and paediatrics, and had a whole lot of trouble making up my mind. I did a year at the children’s hospital and was on the paediatrics training pathway without actually having committed to doing that yet. Just thinking, well, I would have a year of that under my belt if I do decide to do that. Ended up applying for both, getting offers for both and taking it down to the wire in terms of the decision making.” (GP5)
     (4c) Ambiguity avoidancePassive avoidance of ambiguity by denying its existence, since ambiguity is unacceptable; anxiety is a characteristic of this state “[…] I just defaulted to physician training because I didn’t want to do surgery, I didn’t want to do anaesthetics, I didn’t want to do radiology or any of the other super-niche things, so it just seemed like physician training was the default decision. So, I did that and then I just realised the job was crap and then I’m like, ‘Oh wait, there’s GP as an option.’ It almost came as a, not afterthought, but yeah, like a second line consideration for me.” (GP10)
     (4d) Calling and hopeAvoids ambiguity by not particularly doing anything to understand it, but points instead to a ‘higher calling’ to the career choice; accepts that such ambiguity exists. Requires emotionally empowered experiences and intuitive thinking to resolve ambiguity instead, and deliberate evaluation is unlikely to help “I didn’t even know what the pay was until I entered it. I hadn’t looked at the advertised – I should have – I’ve always wanted to do it, so maybe I did look, I can’t remember now but it didn’t faze me […] My plan was always to be a GP and I was quite sad that it didn’t work out that way for me.” (GP8)
    (5) Managing confusionHow the individual seeks out information and knowledge to clarify differences between different specialty career choices, and what this would mean in their individual life
     (5a) Self-awarenessUnderstanding of self (that is, self-awareness) “[…] during medical school and during internship, I didn’t really find one specialty that I was, like, ‘Oh, this is a specialty that I love and I want to do for the rest of my life.’ I found that I did really like that variety and seeing lots of different things.” (GP1)
     (5b) Vocational information: non-GPUnderstanding of non-GP specialties as vocations “Then after my first year of internship and then I already – it just confirmed what I thought before, which was that I couldn’t see myself working in the hospital. […] the problem is that everyone is really overworked and understaffed pretty much. So it’s not because people don’t want to work. It’s the problem you’re overworked and you don’t have enough resources, enough people. But the problem is everyone needs an extra hand.” (GP9)
     (5c) Vocational information: GPHow general practice, GPs and their values were described and contrasted with other medical norms and non-GP specialties “[…] firstly in university, was that I really liked the unit that ran general practice. It seemed to be a unit that actually cared about its students, and it was the first time that I felt that we were able to kind of combine all the medicine that we’ve learnt and really apply in a holistic manner that helped with how we delivered our treatment in the sense of making it patient-centred.” (GP4)
     (5d) Assessing person– environment fitWhen the individual is cognitively comparing the person-environment fit for a specialty career choice against their knowledge of the different choices available “I wanted the diversity of location, as well. So, I wanted to be able to potentially work in an urban environment or a remote environment, or a regional town or whatever. I guess I felt like I wanted to be able to have the flexibility to do that. Again, I think general practice offers that where a lot of other specialties don’t.” (GP2)
    Educational learning construct
    Threshold conceptsKnowledge and experiences that move the individual from confusion (that is, when they don’t know enough about their potential choices) to ambiguity (that is, they know all they can know about their potential choices other than what happens when they step into it themselves) about their GP career choice “[…] he was not only working as a GP, but he was also working as like the obstetrician at the rural hospital and working as the anaesthetist at the rural hospital. So he had lots of lots of different hats. So I guess it sort of showed that a GP doesn’t always have to just be like the GP. Like if you do rural training you can do lots of different things. But even in, I guess metro areas, GPs are doing lots of different roles.” (GP1)
    • View popup
    Table 2. Participating GPs’ demographic summary
    CharacteristicFrequency
    Gender
    Male10
    Female14
    Non-binary/third gender1
    Age, years
    <302
    30-3415
    35-398
    Affiliation
    ACRRM1
    RACGP23
    Both1
    Rural self-identification (multiple allowed)
    Rural background6
    Rural medical school term>12 months7
    Rural postgraduate doctor placement>12 months10
    GP training – mostly rural/regional12
    GPs reporting no substantial medical training rural experiences13
    Number of GP jobs held
    01
    110
    27
    36
    41
    Main GP job location
    New South Wales6
    Northern Territory1
    Queensland13
    South Australia1
    Victoria1
    Western Australia2
    Metropolitan (MMM1)16
    Regional centre (MMM2)3
    Small rural town (MMM5)4
    Very remote (MMM7)1
    • ACRRM = Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine. MMM = Modified Monash Model (classification). RACGP = Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Reasons provided for GP or rural generalist career choices
    Reasons (multiple usually present)Timing (context)Doctor’s characteristics (context)Exposure (context)
    Environmental
    Work experience in GP settingMedical school or pre-vocational, reinforced over timeOpen to all specialties, haven’t decided on specific specialtiesGenerally positive or neutral clinical experience/s in general practice placement, feeling connection or ‘clicking’ with holistic and individualised person-centred care, and/or a patient demographic, and/or a medical community, and/or rural areas, and/or exemplary generalist clinicians
    Ruling specialties and medical interests in or outMedical school and pre-vocational experiencesOpen to all specialties, but is becoming more self-aware of own interests, skills, and capabilities over time – discovers they enjoy a broad variety of medicine and workExperiencing a broad variety of areas of clinical medicine, to the point where they could not choose only one specific specialty to continue in. An ‘aha’ moment often came, realising how different medical areas can be included in GP specialty (with or without training), and GP career could be tailored individually to self
    Validation and support experienced in the general practice environmentMedical school and early pre-vocationalFeels vulnerable with lack of skills or knowledge, and is within identity formation as doctor or GPMedical experiences that were more than observation in the general practice setting with GPs and allied health, ‘feeling helpful’ in the general practice setting compared to other specialty placement experiences, and connecting with GP role models who invested in personal relationships and demonstrated in-depth generalism and continuity of care medicine, while showing that their lifestyles allowed family and other interests to be prominent
    Hospital non-GP specialties perceived as less favourable environment to the individualPre-vocationalTired, burnt out, frustrated, may have completed 10+ years of university and hospital vocational training by this stageSome exposure to general practice setting
    Usually this mechanism was triggered during pre-vocational training which takes place in hospital settings
    Hospital administration (which was difficult to appeal to for personal leave and considerations) particularly prompted this conclusion
    Professional
    GP medical work fits their personal medical interests, after comparing GP and hospital non-GP specialtiesMedical school and pre-vocationalIndividual prefers to ‘know’ patients over a long period of time through interactional and holistic person-centred care; likes a broad variety of presentations and lesser patient acuityExploring different specialties’ skills, attributes, personalities, lifestyle, and own medical interests, preferred values and lifestyle through placements and postgraduate doctor training, including the GP specialty
    GP work setting fits their personality, skills and norms, after comparing GP and hospital non-GP specialtiesMedical school and pre-vocationalIndividual wants to privilege family, personal wellbeing, and external goals, not just medical workObservations of specialty trainees and consultants, finding out information from trainees and consultants, and personal experience working within different specialties, including the GP specialty
    Holds a health system perspective, rather than only privileging their specialty or disciplineRegistrar and fellowThe doctor feels quietly providing value to the healthcare system is important through disease prevention interventions and longitudinal episodic care, rather than easily measurable once-off acute hospital careExperiencing GP work over more than 12 months and realising the value and impact that general practice has on individuals and at a system level
    Medical status perceived to matter less than personal rewards derived from helping othersMedical student to fellowThe doctor values being a part of patients’ health progress and lives, enjoys helping othersExperiencing GP work in one practice for more than 12 months, having their own patient pool.
    Talking about medical status with people external to medical profession.
    Registrar training takes less time and requirements than other specialtiesThe doctor prefers above factors over other specialties’ perceived benefits and long training programmes; wants to plan life outside medical career within 2–5 years rather than 5–10 yearsComparison of non-GP and GP specialty training requirements
    Speaking with non-GP and GP registrars and consultants
    Previous medical experience and credentials (including those gained when pursuing other training pathways) are valued and not ‘wasted’ in GP work and can be used stillPre-vocational to fellowThe doctor previously began training in or has serious interest in other specialist medical pathways (for example, paediatrics or women’s health) but is interested in pivoting to GP because of incompatibilities in lifestyle, or personal or family goals, and similar reasonsExplanation by senior doctors that other medical experience and credentials are beneficial, welcomed, and acknowledged in GP or rural generalist settings
    Non-professional
    Work–life balance and personal sustainability is attainable in GP careerMedical school to fellowDoes not believe medical career should ‘take over’ their lives, believes in the importance of self-care and wellbeing, and is willing to take actions to perform self-careSeeing and knowing GP role models who have built successful and sustainable careers that allow them to be excellent doctors, but also spend time with their families and achieve other goals external to medical career
    Agreeable or tolerable projected economic and social position as GPRegistrar,
    fellow
    No financial responsibilities (for example, mortgage, family) undertaken during pre-vocational years, willingness to change medical perspectives, considers GP pay sufficient since they have enough patients and Medicare billing competence/understandingComparison with GP pay and status with non-medical careers, rather than non-specialist careers
    Availability of locum GP and emergency department positions as second job for GP registrar period
    Understanding and experience in Medicare billing

Supplementary Data

  • Yon_10.3399BJGPO.2024.0218_supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy. 

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 3
October 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
General practice specialty decision making: a system-level Australian qualitative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
General practice specialty decision making: a system-level Australian qualitative study
Faith R Yong, Priya Martin, Katharine A Wallis, Jordan Fox, Sneha Kirubakaran, Riitta L Partanen, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Matthew R McGrail
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0218. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0218

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
General practice specialty decision making: a system-level Australian qualitative study
Faith R Yong, Priya Martin, Katharine A Wallis, Jordan Fox, Sneha Kirubakaran, Riitta L Partanen, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Matthew R McGrail
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0218. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0218
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • qualitative research
  • workforce
  • Medical education
  • General Practice
  • primary healthcare
  • general practitioners

More in this TOC Section

  • Violence and abuse towards staff by patients and the public in general practice since COVID-19
  • Diagnosis and management of migraine in adults: a population-based study in England
  • Carer involvement in GP-patient consultations and translatability to virtual care: multi-methods study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795