Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Core functions of primary care in Amathole District, South Africa: a descriptive study

Robert Mash and Jenny Nash
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0141
Robert Mash
1 Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert Mash
  • For correspondence: rm{at}sun.ac.za
Jenny Nash
2 Eastern Cape Department of Health, District Clinical Specialist Team, Bisho, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Primary care facilities and subdistricts in Amathole District
    SubdistrictCommunity health centre, nClinic, nMobile, nTotal, nPrimary care headcount, n
    Raymond Mhlaba136441396 759
    Ngqushwa022325184 645
    Mnquma128332539 295
    Mbhashe329638593 940
    Great Kei040483 634
    Amahlathi025732308 385
    Total5144231722 106 658
    • View popup
    Table 2. Definitions of the core functions as measured by PCAT-SSA
    Core functionDefinition
    First contact access How easy is it for users to access primary care as the first place that they go when looking for assistance with a health issue.
    Continuity Informational continuity focuses on whether an up-to-date medical record is available when they attend primary care; relational continuity focuses on whether they develop a relationship of trust with and are known by their primary care provider.
    Coordination Parallel coordination focuses on coordination between teams within the PHC level of care; sequential coordination focuses on coordination between teams in different levels of care.
    Comprehensiveness Focuses on whether primary care covers the lifespan, the burden of disease, and includes health promotion, disease prevention, treatment, palliation, and rehabilitation.
    Person-centredness Focuses on whether care incorporates both the biomedical and users’ perspectives on the illness, and whether care focuses on the person and not just the disease.
    • PCAT-SSA = sub-Saharan version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool. PHC = primary health care.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Characteristics of responders
    Characteristicn (%)
    Affiliation to the primary care facility (N = 385) 
    Strong297 (77.1)
    Moderate81 (21.0)
    Weak7 (1.8)
    How long have you been a patient at the facility? (N = 385)  
    <1 year13 (3.4)
    1–2 years43 (11.2)
    3–4 years63 (16.4)
    ≥5 years264 (68.6)
    Unsure2 (0.5)
    Why did you choose this facility? (N = 386)  
    Because it is close to where I live or work232 (60.1)
    Because I can afford the fees3 (0.8)
    Because it offers good quality health care247 (64.0)
    Because I am registered here and not allowed to go elsewhere10 (2.6)
    Because my insurance covers me here0 (0.0)
    Because I was referred here by another facility6 (1.6)
    Other8 (2.1)
    What is your home language? (N = 386)  
    Xhosa384 (99.5)
    Afrikaans1 (0.3)
    English1 (0.3)
    Which of the following best describes your work situation? (N = 386)  
    Employed full time45 (11.7)
    Employed part time14 (3.6)
    Self-employed (informal)23 (6.0)
    Self-employed (formal)4 (1.0)
    Student24 (6.2)
    Home maker7 (1.8)
    Retired115 (29.8)
    Unemployed154 (39.9)
    Which of the following best describes your schooling? (N = 386)  
    Did not complete primary school68 (17.6)
    Completed primary school39 (10.1)
    Did not complete high school166 (43.0)
    Completed high school85 (22.0)
    Completed tertiary education26 (6.7)
    Refuse to answer2 (0.5)
    Do you have piped water? (N = 386)  
    Yes, inside my house44 (11.4)
    Yes, inside my yard175 (45.3)
    Yes, nearby63 (16.3)
    No104 (26.9)
    Do you have electricity in your home? (N = 384)  
    Yes364 (94.8)
    Which of the following best describes your home? (N = 384)  
    Structure made of brick or concrete blocks284 (74.0)
    Structure made of wood, zinc, or mud100 (26.0)
    Refuse1 (0.3)
    Is anyone employed in your household? (N = 385)  
    Yes193 (50.1)
    Do you have water-borne sewage (i.e. a toilet)? (N = 385)  
    Yes, inside my house51 (13.2)
    Yes, inside my yard190 (49.4)
    Yes, nearby2 (0.5)
    No141 (36.6)
    Would you say your health status is: (N = 385)  
    Excellent51 (13.2)
    Very good135 (35.1)
    Good95 (24.7)
    Fair94 (24.4)
    Poor10 (2.6)
    Do you have a chronic condition? (N = 382)  
    Yes88 (23.0)
    • View popup
    Table 4. Core functions of primary care
    FunctionMedian score (IQR)Scoring ≥3,
    n (%)
    Interpretation
    Primary care (N = 333)3.3 (3.2–3.5)308 (92.5)Acceptable
    Access (N = 385)1.7 (1.0–2.9)96 (24.9)Poor
    Utilisation (N = 384)4.0 (4.0–4.0)384 (100.0)Good
    Comprehensiveness (N = 344)3.3 (2.9–3.6)259 (75.3)Acceptable
    Continuity (N = 379)3.2 (3.1–3.6)332 (87.6)Acceptable
    Person-centeredness (N = 380)4.0 (4.0–4.0)368 (96.8)Good
    Coordination (N = 386)4.0 (4.0–4.0)366 (94.8)Good
    • IQR = interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Associations between subdistricts, health status, and sociodemographic factors and mean primary care score
    VariableMean primary care score (95% CI)P value
    Subdistrict   
    Mnquma3.3 (3.2 to 3.3)<0.001
    Mbhashe3.5 (3.4 to 3.5)
    Amahlathi3.3 (3.2 to 3.3)
    Ngqushwa3.4 (3.3 to 3.5)
    Great Kei3.1 (3.0 to 3.2)
    Raymond Mhlaba3.4 (3.3 to 3.4)
    Gender   
    Man3.30.103
    Woman3.4
    Mean difference-0.1 (-0.1 to 0.0)
    Education   
    Did not complete primary school3.4 (3.3 to 3.5)0.323
    Completed primary school3.4 (3.3 to 3.5)
    Did not complete secondary school3.3 (3.3 to 3.4)
    Completed secondary school3.4 (3.3 to 3.4)
    Completed tertiary education3.3 (3.2 to 3.4)
    Type of house   
    Structure made of brick or concrete blocks3.40.018
    Structure made of wood, zinc, or mud3.3
    Mean difference0.1 (0.0 to 0.1)
    Employment in household   
    Yes3.30.459
    No3.4
    Mean difference-0.0 (-0.1 to 0.0)
    Employment of patient   
    Employed full time3.3 (3.3 to 3.3)0.014
    Employed part time3.3 (3.1 to 3.5)
    Self-employed (informal)3.4 (3.2 to 3.5)
    Self-employed (formal)3.5 (3.2 to 3.7)
    Student3.2 (3.0 to 3.3)
    Home maker3.4 (3.2 to 3.6)
    Retired3.3 (3.3 to 3.4)
    Unemployed3.4 (3.3 to 3.5)
    Piped water   
    Yes, inside house3.2 (3.1 to 3.3)<0.001
    Yes, in yard3.4 (3.4 to 3.5)
    Yes, nearby3.4 (3.3 to 3.5)
    No3.2 (3.2 to 3.3)
    Electricity   
    Yes3.30.308
    No3.3
    Mean difference0.1 (-0.1 to 0.2)
    Toilet   
    Yes, inside house3.2 (3.1 to 3.3) 
    Yes, in yard3.5 (3.4 to 3.5) 
    Yes, nearby3.9 (3.3 to 4.5) 
    No3.2 (3.2 to 3.3) 
    Health status   
    Excellent3.4 (3.3 to 3.4)<0.001
    Very good3.5 (3.4 to 3.5)
    Good3.3 (3.2 to 3.3)
    Fair3.3 (3.2 to 3.3)
    Poor3.3 (3.1 to 3.4)
    Chronic condition   
    Yes3.2<0.001
    No3.4
    Mean difference-0.2 (-0.3 to -0.2)
    • View popup
    Table 6. Comparison of performance with studies from South Africa,12 Kenya,9 and Uganda13
    Mean scoreMedian score
    Core functionSouth AfricaKenyaUgandaAmathole
    Primary care3.12.63.03.3
    Access2.52.32.61.7
    Utilisation3.43.13.04.0
    Comprehensiveness3.22.13.03.3
    Continuity2.92.82.63.2
    Person-centredness——3.54.0
    Coordination3.32.92.34.0
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 3
October 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Core functions of primary care in Amathole District, South Africa: a descriptive study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Core functions of primary care in Amathole District, South Africa: a descriptive study
Robert Mash, Jenny Nash
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0141. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0141

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Core functions of primary care in Amathole District, South Africa: a descriptive study
Robert Mash, Jenny Nash
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0141. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0141
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • facility access
  • health care quality assessments
  • primary care
  • South Africa
  • health services accessibility

More in this TOC Section

  • Workplace wellbeing for the general practice workforce across England: mapping current services
  • Violence and abuse towards staff by patients and the public in general practice since COVID-19
  • Diagnosis and management of migraine in adults: a population-based study in England
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795