Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey

Stephanie Tierney, Lucy Moore, Debra Westlake, Kamal Mahtani, David Nunan, Kerryn Husk, Shoba Dawson, Jane Smith, Emma Fuller, Lilly Sabir, Pauline Roberts and Obioha Ukoumunne
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0128
Stephanie Tierney
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie Tierney
  • For correspondence: stephanie.tierney{at}phc.ox.ac.uk
Lucy Moore
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Westlake
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Debra Westlake
Kamal Mahtani
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Nunan
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerryn Husk
2 Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shoba Dawson
3 School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shoba Dawson
Jane Smith
4 University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Fuller
5 Oxford City Primary Care Services, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilly Sabir
6 Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pauline Roberts
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Obioha Ukoumunne
4 University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Obioha Ukoumunne
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Whether responders were thinking about leaving their role as a link worker (in past 6 months and next 6 months)

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Predictors of whether considered leaving post as link worker in past 6 months
    Predictor variableOdds ratio95% CIP value
    Gender 0.44
    Malereference
    Female0.770.39 to 1.51
    Age, years 0.39
    21–30reference
    31–400.790.32 to 1.91
    41–500.580.26 to 1.29
    51–600.490.23 to 1.07
    >600.610.22 to 1.65
    Role 0.13
    Primary care network (PCN)reference
    Voluntary community service0.830.51 to 1.35
    Local authority1.170.28 to 4.93
    Other0.200.05 to 0.78
    How long have you been link worker? 0.008
    1–6 monthsreference
    7–12 months1.780.68 to 4.63
    13–36 months3.601.64 to 7.91
    >36 months2.220.99 to 4.96
    Do you regard role as job or vocation? 0.001
    Jobreference
    Vocation0.310.15 to 0.64
    Part of peer support group 0.008
    Noreference
    Yes0.500.30 to 0.84
    Time to connect with voluntary community sector 0.008
    Up to 1 hour a weekreference
    Two hours/half a day a week0.510.27 to 0.94
    One day a week or more0.330.17 to 0.67
    Time in working week to undertake training <0.001
    Disagreereference
    Neutral0.360.14 to 0.97
    Agree0.180.09 to 0.38
    Receives supervision about patient cases 0.02
    Neverreference
    Every 2–6 months0.630.27 to 1.51
    Every 4–6 weeks0.380.18 to 0.82
    At least once a fortnight0.280.11 to 0.69
    Receives supervision about own wellbeing 0.001
    Neverreference
    Every 2–6 months0.280.11 to 0.71
    Every 4–6 weeks0.190.08 to 0.45
    At least once a fortnight0.150.05 to 0.44
    Occupational self-efficacy (per 10-unit decrease )1.911.24 to 2.930.003
    Job discrepancy (per 30-unit increase )6.863.91 to 12.0<0.001
    • Totals range from 290–314.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Predictors of whether considering leaving post as link worker in next 6 months
    PredictorOdds ratio95% CIP value
    Gender 0.26
    Malereference
    Female0.640.30 to 1.39
    Age, years 0.19
    21–30reference
    31–401.640.64 to 4.21
    41–500.750.31 to 1.82
    51–600.670.28 to 1.60
    >600.80.26 to 2.47
    Role 0.65
    Primary care network (PCN)reference
    Voluntary community service0.880.51 to 1.54
    Local authority1.320.30 to 5.77
    Other0.390.08 to 1.94
    How long have you been link worker? 0.01
    1–6 monthsreference
    7–12 months2.520.77 to 8.21
    13–36 months3.841.41 to 10.4
    >36 months1.680.59 to 4.78
    Do you regard role as job or vocation? 0.002
    Jobreference
    Vocation0.350.17 to 0.69
    Part of peer support group 0.03
    Noreference
    Yes0.520.29 to 0.92
    Time to connect with voluntary community sector <0.001
    Up to 1 hour a weekreference
    Two hours/half a day a week0.270.14 to 0.54
    One day a week or more0.240.11 to 0.52
    Time in working week to undertake training 0.004
    Disagreereference
    Neutral0.820.32 to 2.10
    Agree0.360.18 to 0.69
    Receives supervision about patient cases 0.04
    Neverreference
    Every 2–6 months1.310.53 to 3.27
    Every 4–6 weeks0.490.21 to 1.13
    At least once a fortnight0.770.29 to 2.08
    Receives supervision about own wellbeing 0.02
    Neverreference
    Every 2–6 months0.850.36 to 2.02
    Every 4–6 weeks0.440.19 to 1.01
    At least once a fortnight0.250.08 to 0.77
    Occupational self-efficacy (per 10-unit decrease )1.240.82 to 2.060.27
    Job discrepancy (per 30-unit increase )4.862.70 to 8.72<0.001
    • Totals range from 228–247.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Factors participants stated would help to retain link workers in their role
    Broad conceptComponentsSupporting data
    Working conditions
    • Setting: having a room to see patients in, better IT systems to record patient contacts and to reduce administration burden

    • Support: from managers, including supervision, from peers, receiving appropriate training, emotional wellbeing checks

    • Salary

    • Security: permanent or longer contracts, carer progression opportunities, having enough staff to safely support patients and to have manageable workloads

    ‘Higher pay, more training encouraged, more time together as a team as remote lone working can be tough …’ (Responder 22)
    ‘Stability of the post. 5 to 7 years contract so I can concentrate on the role more and less about whether I will have a job and have to apply for a new one.’ (Responder 42)
    ‘I think an increase in pay … would make us feel more valued, even though we don’t do it for the money. Having said that, some of the benefits my organisation has offered (eg, carers leave, wellbeing days) have definitely helped me to stay as I feel like my organisation cares about my wellbeing …’ (Responder 46)
    ‘By being employed by organisations that don’t actually manage us, there is a very disjointed style of support and I do not feel I have a relationship with anyone senior.’ (Responder 62)
    ‘I know a brilliant social prescriber who left to take another job because it was more money. Would suggest after 6 months of service, when we have developed that local knowledge, that pay should go up.’ (Responder 102)
    ‘Peer support is vital when we spend so much time lone working.’ (Responder 153)
    Understanding of the role
    • Clarity around the role so people, including managers, know what it entails, to help with appropriate referrals

    • Recognition as a profession to feel respected and valued by the wider primary care team, and more connected to a practice; might include the ability to acquire a recognised qualification

    ‘Medical colleagues using the service for referrals that are ready for change. These roles can be used for putting "heartsink" patients to, after causing anxiety for the referee.’ (Responder 60)
    ‘… a manager who knows what you are doing, appreciation of complex referrals, less focus on stats, feeling more of a priority, feeling valued.’ (Responder 78)
    ‘A proper training programme that gives a recognised qualification that is mandatory for the role ...’ (Responder 154)
    ‘Being valued and understood by other roles. As we are "community" rather than clinical the view from one practice manager was that all we did was go to knitting groups and drink coffee, which is far from the true day-to-day job.’ (Responder 269)
    Autonomy
    • Being able to work in a person-centred way, including where patients are seen

    • Having time to work with patients, to make connections with the VCSE sector, for relevant training, less form filling

    ‘So often I have spoken with other people in same/similar roles and surprised how constrained they are. Box-ticking is what seems to happen; the personalised care approach with a holistic modality is not always understood by services...’ (Responder 16)
    ‘Less form-filling and more patient-focused time …’ (Responder 104)
    ‘… a manageable workload so you have time to make community connections or discuss tricky cases with colleagues before acting.’ (Responder 120)
    ‘… provide proper holistic support rather than the 15 minutes time slots allocated ... which I fight against every day.’ (Responder 125)
    ‘Being allowed to trust their instincts, being allowed to attend more training and community events, being trusted to manage my own workload.’ (Responder 322)
    • VCSE = voluntary, community, and social enterprise organisations

Supplementary Data

  • Tier_10.3399BJGPO.2024.0128_supp.docx -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy. 

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 3
October 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey
Stephanie Tierney, Lucy Moore, Debra Westlake, Kamal Mahtani, David Nunan, Kerryn Husk, Shoba Dawson, Jane Smith, Emma Fuller, Lilly Sabir, Pauline Roberts, Obioha Ukoumunne
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0128. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0128

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey
Stephanie Tierney, Lucy Moore, Debra Westlake, Kamal Mahtani, David Nunan, Kerryn Husk, Shoba Dawson, Jane Smith, Emma Fuller, Lilly Sabir, Pauline Roberts, Obioha Ukoumunne
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (3): BJGPO.2024.0128. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0128
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • link workers
  • job retention
  • social prescribing
  • primary health care
  • cross-sectional studies

More in this TOC Section

  • Patients’ experiences of phosphatidylethanol in hypertension treatment in primary care: qualitative study
  • Implementing a medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy in general practice: a feasibility study
  • A systematic review of the perspectives of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes on behavioural weight management
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795