Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

What’s been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice

Carol Sinnott, Evleen Price, Akbar Ansari, Rebecca Fisher, Jake Beech, Hugh Alderwick and Mary Dixon-Woods
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (2): BJGPO.2024.0184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0184
Carol Sinnott
1 The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carol Sinnott
  • For correspondence: carol.sinnott{at}thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk
Evleen Price
1 The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Evleen Price
Akbar Ansari
1 The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Akbar Ansari
Rebecca Fisher
2 Nuffield Trust, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rebecca Fisher
Jake Beech
3 The Health Foundation, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugh Alderwick
3 The Health Foundation, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hugh Alderwick
Mary Dixon-Woods
1 The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mary Dixon-Woods
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of search
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Years of publication of sources (n=449)
  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3. Description of sources (n = 449)
  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4. Outcomes addressed by included sources. aSources could address multiple different outcomes. Other outcomes related to: self-management (n = 7), continuity (n = 6), costs (n = 6), medication-related (n = 4); implementation outcomes (n = 1); access for underserved or seldom heard groups (n = 2), other patient and staff impacts (n = 4), safety (n = 2), new guidance (n = 1).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Summary of the seven features of the Candidacy Framework for understanding access10
    FeatureExplanation
    Identification How people recognise their symptoms as needing medical attention or intervention is important to how they assert a claim to candidacy
    Navigation Using services requires knowledge of the available services and depends on having the practical resources to use them
    Permeability The ease with which people can use services depends on how many and what kinds of criteria people have to meet to use them, and on cultural and other alignments between services and individuals
    Appearances Appearing at services involves people making a claim to candidacy. It requires a set of competencies and socio-cultural alignments
    Adjudications Professional judgements about patients’ candidacy strongly influence individuals’ access to attention and interventions
    Offers and resistance Offers of care may be made that may be accepted (for example, utilisation) or refused (for example, non-utilisation) by individuals
    Operating conditions The perceived or actual availability and suitability of resources has a major impact on the local production of candidacy, as do other relevant operating conditions
    • View popup
    Table 2. Summary of categorisation and the features of the Candidacy Framework addressed by each subcategory
    Main categoriesSubcategoriesINPApAdOfOC
    Appointment innovationsTriage21
    Telehealth12
    Restructuring appointment systems12
    Offering patient contacts that are not appointments2212
    Direct patient access to services that remove need to access general practiceCommunity pharmacists12
    Self-referral pathways1
    Increasing the number and range of professionals available to see patients within general practiceExpansion and diversification of skill-mix2122
    Improving GP recruitment and retention2
    Offering contacts beyond core hours, core settings, and core servicesExtended hours services provided by GPs within their own practice or practice network1
    GP services external to a patient’s practice or local practice network1
    Enhanced services within practices21
    Expanded or re-organised services within the wider community2212
    Supporting patient engagement, empowerment, and educationEducational initiatives targeting patients1222
    Digital resources for patients12
    Practice-level interventions or interventions targeting practice staff and professional behaviour222122
    System-level interventions targeted at patients1222
    Supporting the internal and wider structures of general practiceMaking existing processes in practices more efficient1
    Reducing the burden of bureaucracy in general practices1
    Interventions to ensure general practices at high risk of closing stay open1
    Financial mechanisms for improving access1
    Contracting and commissioning to shape provider markets1
    Changes to the scale or model of general practice (not otherwise included)1
    • Ad = adjudications. Ap = appearances. I = identification of candidacy. N = navigation. P = permeability. OC = operating conditions. Of = offers and resistance. See description of each feature in Table 1. ‘1’ indicates the candidacy feature most addressed by an intervention, ‘2’ indicates secondarily affected features.

Supplementary Data

  • CS_10.3399BJGPO.2024.0184_supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy. 

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 2
July 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What’s been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What’s been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice
Carol Sinnott, Evleen Price, Akbar Ansari, Rebecca Fisher, Jake Beech, Hugh Alderwick, Mary Dixon-Woods
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (2): BJGPO.2024.0184. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0184

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
What’s been tried: a curated catalogue of efforts to improve access to general practice
Carol Sinnott, Evleen Price, Akbar Ansari, Rebecca Fisher, Jake Beech, Hugh Alderwick, Mary Dixon-Woods
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (2): BJGPO.2024.0184. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0184
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • LinkedIn logo LinkedIn
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • Bluesky logo Bluesky

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • general practice
  • access to primary care
  • systematic review
  • Primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • UK primary care teams and social determinants of health intervention: a qualitative study
  • Responses to the inverse care law in Scottish general practice and the role of the Deep End project: a qualitative study
  • Deprivation and primary care network performance: a national cross-sectional study of the Investment and Impact Fund scheme
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795