Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Lyme disease in UK primary care: a knowledge, attitude, and practice survey

Lucy Delaney, Amanda Semper, Neil French and John SP Tulloch
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (1): BJGPO.2024.0092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0092
Lucy Delaney
1 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
2 Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lucy Delaney
  • For correspondence: ldelaney{at}liverpool.ac.uk
Amanda Semper
1 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 Rare and Imported Pathogens Laboratory, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil French
1 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
2 Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John SP Tulloch
1 NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
4 Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, School of Veterinary Science, Neston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John SP Tulloch
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. GP LD KAP survey response count by responder UK postcode area
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Percentage of responders (by nation), who indicated that they perceived listed regions to be high-risk for LD, alongside published regional laboratory confirmed incidence rates (cases per 100 000). aEstimated published laboratory confirmed incidence figures (cases per 100 000).5,6,25,26 bDenoted as high-risk areas in NICE guidance.12

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Survey response count and response rate by circulation route
    CRN (England)SPCRN (Scotland)Social mediaPCDSRCGPTotal
    Survey access count, n 32621160916121174
    Response rate, %33.125.15.16.3016.4
    • CRN = Clinical Research Network. PCDS = The Primary Care Dermatology Society. RCGP (Royal College of General Practitioners. SPCRN = Scottish Primary Care Research Network.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Survey participant demographics and LD relevant consultations by nation
    DemographicScotland survey (N = 61), %
    (95% CI)
    Scottish national, %P-valueEngland survey (N=130), %
    (95% CI)
    English national, %P-valueOdds ratio
    (95% CI)
    Age band, years
    <314.90.6n/a0.80.6n/an/a
    31-4029.530.6n/a23.126.7n/an/a
    41-5036.134.3n/a40.834.9n/an/a
    51-6026.228.9n/a30.027.7n/an/a
    >603.35.6n/a5.410.1n/an/a
    Sex
    Female73.861.60.0253.856.90.24n/a
    Relevant patient consultations in previous 3 years
    Tick bite96.7
    (88.65 to 99.6)
    n/an/a80.0
    (72.08 to 86.5)
    n/a<0.0017.38
    (1.69 to 32.18)
    Suspected LD93.4
    (84.05 to 98.18)
    n/an/a70.8
    (62.15 to 78.41)
    n/a<0.0015.89
    (2.0 to 17.36)
    Treated LD91.8
    (81.9 to 97.28)
    n/an/a63.8
    (54.96 to 72.08)
    n/a<0.0016.34
    (2.38 to 16.94)
    Practice catchment area (multi-response)
    Rural59.0 (45.68 to 71.45)n/an/a23.8 (16.81 to 32.11)n/a<0.0014.60
    (2.4 to 8.81)
    Urban31.1 (19.90 to 44.29)n/an/a40.8
    (32.24 to 49.73)
    n/a0.100.66 (0.34 to 1.25)
    Suburban11.5
    (4.74 to 22.23)
    n/an/a36.2 (27.92 to 45.04)n/a<0.0010.23
    (0.09 to 0.54)
    • n/a = value or calculation not applicable. CI = confidence interval. LD = Lyme disease.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Knowledge-based questions with percentage stated response by nation
    Survey responseScotland response (N = 61), %
    (95 CI)
    England response (N = 130), %
    (95 CI)
    OR (95% CI)P-value
    Tick exposure
    Infected ticks may occur in green space in: (rural, suburban and urban response)55.7 (42.45 to 68.45)44.6 (35.9 to 53.58)1.56 (0.85 to 2.88)0.08
    Diagnosis (True/False): correct response score
    False: Tick bite recall is necessary for clinical suspicion of LD96.7 (88.65 to 99.6)94.6 (89.22 to 97.81)1.68
    (0.34 to 8.33)
    0.28
    False: EM appears within ≤24 hours of a tick bite88.5 (77.77 to 95.26)70.0 (61.34 to 77.72)6.23
    (1.41 to 27.62)
    <0.01
    True: EM is an expanding lesion with a partial central clearing100 (94.13 to 100)96.9 (92.31 to 99.16)n/an/a
    True: EM is sufficient for a clinical diagnosis of LD93.4 (84.05 to 98.18)76.2 (67.89 to 83.19)3.89
    (1.29 to 11.67)
    <0.01
    False: EM is always present in LD96.7 (88.65 to 99.6)93.1 (87.26 to 96.79)0.98
    (0.09 to 10.97)
    0.47
    True: Multiple EM may be on different areas of the body39.3 (27.07 to 52.69)45.4 (36.64 to 54.35)0.74 (0.38 to 1.44)0.19
    True: EM may be located in a different area from tick bite63.9 (50.63 to 75.84)54.6 (45.65 to 63.36)1.54 (0.76 to –3.12)0.12
    LD laboratory testing (True/False): correct response score
    False: A patient with EM should be tested for LD63.9 (50.63 to 75.84)26.9 (19.52 to 35.4)4.81 (2.51 to 9.22)<0.001
    LD associated signs and symptoms (multi-response)
    Fatigue/lethargy100100 a a
    Diffuse myalgia and arthralgia10099.2 a a
    EM10098.5 a a
    Fever93.490.0 a a
    Arthritis91.892.3 a a
    Cranial neuritis ± facial nerve palsy93.468.5 a a
    Atrioventricular block57.455.4 a a
    Provided all 7 valid responses above55.747.7 a a
    Treatment (adult without focal symptoms — first choice treatment)
    Doxycycline98.4 (91.2 to 99.96)86.2 (79 to 91.58)9.64 (1.26 to 74)<0.01
    Duration of 21 days83.3 (71.48 to 91.71)57.1 (47.45 to 66.45)3.75 (1.73 to 8.14)<0.001
    Dose of 200 mg daily80.0 (67.67 to 89.22)56.3 (46.56 to 65.61)3.11 (1.49 to 6.49)<0.001
    Correct dose and duration70.0 (56.79 to 81.16)42.0 (32.7 to 51.66)3.23 (1.66 to 6.29)<0.001
    • True and False response options: analysis included a ’don’t know’ response with the incorrect response option. If applicable, ’don’t know’ responses (%) for each responder group are tabulated in Supplementary Table 1. aMulti-response options may have values >100%, with no associated OR or P-value calculable. CI = confidence interval. EM = erythema migrans. LD = Lyme disease. n/a = not applicable. OR = odds ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Attitude and Practice questions with percentage response by nation
    Survey responseScotland response (N = 61), % (95% CI)England response (N = 130), % (95% CI)OR
    (95% CI)
    P-value
    Attitudes responses
    Disagreed ‘LD is a likely outcome if a person is bitten by a tick in the UK‘86.9 (75.78 to 94.1681.5 (73.79 to 87.80)1.92 (0.74 to 5.00)0.09
    Considers LD to occur within their practice region93.4 (84.05 to 98.18)86.9 (79.89 to 92.19)2.14 (0.69 to 6.67)0.09
    Practice/clinical scenario
    Consultation with asymptomatic patient with attached and engorged tick
     Advise/remove tick100 (94.13 to 100)95.4 (90.22 to 98.29) a a
     Don't know response03.1 (0.84 to 7.69) a a
     Other response01.5 (0.19 to 5.45) a a
    Indicated method of tick removal (multi-response)
     Tick removal tool96.7 (88.65 to 99.6)89.2 (82.59 to 93.99) a a
    Further advice (themes from free text responses)
     No further advice indicated18.0 (9.36 to 29.98)14.6 (9.03 to 21.88) a a
     Prophylaxis8.2 (2.72 to 18.1)26.2 (18.84 to 34.58) a a
     Symptoms advice — EM alone24.6 (14.46 to 37.29)22.3 (15.48 to 30.44) a a
     Symptoms advice — EM and non-EM rash symptoms55.7 (42.45 to 68.45)40.8 (32.24 to 49.73) a a
    Treating a patient with a positive non-NHS approved LD test
     Would treat patient on basis of test18.0 (9.36 to 29.98)35.4 (27.2 to 44.25) a a
     Would not treat patient on basis of test23.0 (13.15 to 35.5)11.5 (6.60 to 18.32) a a
     Would consult guidance41.0 (28.55 to 54.32)47.7 (38.86 to 56.63) a a
     Other (free text response see Table S4a)18.0 (9.36 to 29.98)5.4 (2.19 to 10.78) a a
    Clinically manage a patient with ongoing symptoms of headache and fatigue following two courses of antibiotics for LD with EM
     Refer to an Infectious Disease specialist95.1 (86.29 to 98.97)72.3 (63.78 to 79.79) a a
     Discuss other possible causes for symptoms55.7 (42.45 to 68.45)57.7 (48.72 to 66.3) a a
     Discuss symptoms may not be active disease — keep under review31.1 (19.9 to 44.29)31.5 (23.67 to 40.27) a a
     Refer to other specialist8.2 (2.72 to 18.1)17.7 (11.56 to 25.35) a a
     Prescribe a third course of antibiotics for LD4.9 (1.03 to 13.71)1.5 (0.19 to 5.45) a a
    • True and False response options: analysis included a ’don’t know’ response with the incorrect response option. If applicable, ’don’t know’ responses (%) for each responder group are tabulated in Supplementary Table 1. aMulti-response options may have values >100%, with no associated OR or P-value calculable. CI = confidence interval. EM = erythema migrans. LD = Lyme disease. OR = odds ratio.

Supplementary Data

  • D10.3399_BJGPO.2024.0092_supp.pdf -

    Supplementary material is not copyedited or typeset, and is published as supplied by the author(s). The author(s) retain(s) responsibility for its accuracy.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 1
April 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lyme disease in UK primary care: a knowledge, attitude, and practice survey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lyme disease in UK primary care: a knowledge, attitude, and practice survey
Lucy Delaney, Amanda Semper, Neil French, John SP Tulloch
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (1): BJGPO.2024.0092. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0092

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lyme disease in UK primary care: a knowledge, attitude, and practice survey
Lucy Delaney, Amanda Semper, Neil French, John SP Tulloch
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (1): BJGPO.2024.0092. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0092
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • health knowledge, attitudes, practice
  • Lyme disease
  • primary care

More in this TOC Section

  • A mixed-methods qualitative study of Northern Ireland GP specialty trainees’ clinical confidence and teaching expectations in musculoskeletal medicine
  • Accuracy and suitability of eating disorder screening tools for binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa in a primary care setting: a systematic review and narrative summary
  • Delivering a primary care review for people prescribed opioids for persistent pain: a qualitative study on the facilitators and barriers facing practice pharmacists
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2026 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795