Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study

Demi Ronner, Dorien Oostra, Jurgen Claassen, Edo Richard and Marieke Perry
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (1): BJGPO.2024.0065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0065
Demi Ronner
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center (UMC) Alzheimer Center, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Demi Ronner
  • For correspondence: demi.ronner{at}radboudumc.nl
Dorien Oostra
2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dorien Oostra
Jurgen Claassen
2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
3 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jurgen Claassen
Edo Richard
4 Department of Neurology, Radboud UMC Alzheimer Center, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
5 Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Edo Richard
Marieke Perry
1 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center (UMC) Alzheimer Center, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marieke Perry
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1. Inclusion flowchart. Reasons of referral other than cognitive analysis included analysis of functional decline (n = 4), functional decline and falls (n = 2), treatment advice for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or persistent acoustic hallucinations (n = 3), and other (n = 8).
  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2. Proportion of people diagnosed with dementia by number of diagnostic criteria present in GP referral letters

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Diagnostic dementia criteria formulated in the Dutch GP dementia guidelines, translated from Dutch to English
    Cognitive or behavioural symptoms that:
    1. Interfere with daily functioning
    2. Represent a decline from previous levels of functioning and performing
    3. Are not explained by delirium or depression
    4. Are diagnosed based on (collateral) history-taking and objectified by a cognitive test (MMSE and clock-drawing test or RUDAS)
    5. Involve ≥2 of the following domains:
    • Impaired ability to acquire and remember new information

    • Impaired reasoning and handling of complex tasks; poor judgement

    • Impaired visuospatial abilities

    • Impaired language functions

    • Changes in personality or behaviour

    • MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination. RUDAS = Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Characteristics of patients by different diagnostic outcome groupsa
    CharacteristicTotal, N = 651Dementia, n = 348MCI, n = 156SMCs, n = 71Inconclusive, n = 50Other, n = 26
    Age, years, mean (SD)78.0 (6.8)79.8 (6.6)76.8 (5.9)73.5 (6.8)77.6 (6.1)73.8 (7.4)
    Sex, female348 (53.5)199 (57.2)77 (49.4)28 (39.4)31 (62.0)13 (50.0)
    Education level
    Low
    Moderate
    High
    Unknown
    126 (19.4)
    283 (43.5)
    186 (28.6)
    56 (8.6)
    82 (23.6)
    162 (46.6)
    77 (22.1)
    27 (7.8)
    19 (12.2)
    64 (41.0)
    58 (37.2)
    15 (9.6)
    8 (11.3)
    23 (32.4)
    32 (45.1)
    8 (11.3)
    14 (28.0)
    23 (46.0)
    10 (20.0)
    3 (6.0)
    3 (11.5)
    11 (42.3)
    9 (34.6)
    3 (11.5)
    Marital status
    Married
    Divorced
    Widow(er)
    Other
    Unknown
    341 (52.4)
    45 (6.9)
    201 (30.9)
    60 (9.2)
    4 (0.6)
    176 (50.6)
    15 (4.3)
    132 (37.9)
    25 (7.2)
    0 (0.0)
    85 (54.5)
    10 (6.4)
    39 (25.0)
    20 (12.8)
    2 (1.3)
    48 (67.6)
    6 (8.5)
    6 (8.5)
    10 (14.1)
    1 (1.4)
    18 (36.0)
    12 (24.0)
    17 (34.0)
    3 (6.0)
    0 (0.0)
    14 (53.8)
    2 (7.7)
    7 (26.9)
    2 (7.7)
    1 (3.8)
    Living situation
    Alone
    With others
    Other
    Unknown
    280 (43.0)
    352 (54.1)
    14 (2.2)
    5 (0.8)
    164 (47.1)
    176 (50.6)
    7 (2.0)
    1 (0.3)
    62 (39.7)
    88 (56.4)
    5 (3.2)
    1 (0.6)
    18 (25.4)
    51 (71.8)
    0 (0.0)
    2 (2.8)
    23 (46.0)
    24 (48.0)
    2 (4.0)
    1 (2.0)
    13 (50.0)
    13 (50.0)
    0 (0.0)
    0 (0.0)
    Receives home care
    Yes
    No
    Unknown
    142 (21.8)
    435 (66.8)
    74 (11.4)
    99 (28.4)
    224 (64.4)
    25 (7.2)
    20 (12.8)
    111 (71.2)
    25 (16.0)
    4 (5.6)
    56 (78.9)
    11 (15.5)
    14 (28.0)
    30 (60.0)
    6 (12.0)
    5 (19.2)
    14 (53.8)
    7 (26.9)
    Receives informal care
    Yes
    No
    Unknown
    389 (59.8)
    80 (12.3)
    182 (28.0)
    271 (77.9)
    24 (6.9)
    53 (15.2)
    61 (39.1)
    29 (18.6)
    66 (42.3)
    11 (15.5)
    17 (23.9)
    43 (60.6)
    35 (70.0)
    5 (10.0)
    10 (20.0)
    11 (42.3)
    5 (19.2)
    10 (38.5)
    Comorbidities
    Total, mean (SD)
    History of depression
    3.4 (2.1)
    85 (13.1)
    3.4 (2.1)
    34 (9.8)
    3.3 (2.6)
    19 (12.2)
    2.9 (2.0)
    15 (21.1)
    3.5 (2.0)
    8 (16.0)
    3.5 (1.9)
    9 (34.6)
    Total number of medications, mean (SD)5.0 (3.7)5.2 (3.6)4.9 (3.9)3.9 (3.1)5.9 (3.8)5.6 (4.4)
    • Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated. MCI = mild cognitive impairment. SD = standard deviation. SMCs = subjective memory complaints.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Presence of diagnostic workup elements in GP referral letters by diagnostic outcome
    Workup elementDementia, n = 348No dementia, n = 303P valueDementia without AI, n = 235Dementia with AI, n = 113P value
    Patient’s history305 (87.6)277 (91.4)0.119205 (87.2)100 (88.5)0.738
    Collateral history278 (79.9)175 (57.8)<0.001188 (80.0)90 (79.6)0.939
    Physical exam98 (28.2)60 (19.8)0.01369 (29.4)29 (25.7)0.473
    Neurological exam26 (7.5)29 (9.6)0.33711 (4.7)15 (13.3)0.004
    Blood test94 (27.0)75 (24.8)0.51266 (28.1)28 (24.8)0.515
    DD dementia mentioned197 (56.6)117 (38.6)<0.001137 (58.3)60 (53.1)0.359
    MMSE performed149 (42.8)103 (34.0)0.02198 (41.7)51 (45.1)0.545
    MMSE, performed score, mean (SD)23.7 (3.9)25.7 (3.3)<0.00123.4 (4.1)24.3 (3.3)0.210
    Time to referral, months, mean (SD)a 6.0 (13.3)3.8 (8.9)0.0036.1 (13.6)5.8 (12.7)0.893
    • Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated. aTime from first consultation to referral based on first contact mentioned in referral letter and referral letter date. AI = ancillary investigations. DD = differential diagnosis. MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination. SD = standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Presence of diagnostic dementia criteria in GP referral letters by diagnostic outcome
    Diagnostic dementia criteriumDementia, n = 348No dementia, n = 303P valueDementia without AI, n = 235Dementia with AI, n = 113P value
    Symptoms interfere with daily functioning152 (43.7)78 (25.7)<0.001112 (47.7)40 (35.4)0.031
    Symptoms represent decline from previous levels of functioning232 (66.7)154 (50.8)<0.001159 (67.7)73 (64.6)0.571
    Symptoms not explained by delirium or depression7 (2.0)7 (2.3)0.6181 (0.4)6 (5.3)N/Aa
    Symptoms diagnosed based on history-taking and cognitive test71 (20.4)30 (9.9)0.00247 (20.0)24 (21.2)0.788
    Cognitive impairment in ≥2 domains219 (62.9)133 (43.9)<0.001218 (92.8)106 (93.8)0.720
    ≥2 diagnostic criteria present217 (62.4)125 (41.3)<0.001148 (63.0)69 (61.1)0.730
    ≥3 diagnostic criteria present130 (37.4)49 (16.2)<0.00193 (39.6)37 (32.7)0.217
    • Data are presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated. aN/A = not applicable; groups too small for statistical testing, n = 7. AI = ancillary investigations.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 9, Issue 1
April 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study
Demi Ronner, Dorien Oostra, Jurgen Claassen, Edo Richard, Marieke Perry
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (1): BJGPO.2024.0065. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0065

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study
Demi Ronner, Dorien Oostra, Jurgen Claassen, Edo Richard, Marieke Perry
BJGP Open 2025; 9 (1): BJGPO.2024.0065. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0065
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dementia
  • diagnosis
  • care of older people
  • aged

More in this TOC Section

  • Experiences of general practitioners in Germany with incretin mimetics: a qualitative study
  • Scoping the patient-safety implications of AI-based communication with migrants in general practice
  • The PPC-17 survey identifies 8 to 17 years old children at risk of suffering from school bullying: An implementation study in a primary care setting
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795