Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Practice & Policy

Global health inequity and primary care

Luke N Allen, Luisa M Pettigrew, Josephine Exley, Harry Collin, Shona Bates and Michael Kidd
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (4): BJGPO.2024.0189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0189
Luke N Allen
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: luke.allen@phc.ox.ac.uk
Luisa M Pettigrew
3 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josephine Exley
3 Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harry Collin
4 Severn School of Primary Care, Bath, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shona Bates
2 Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Kidd
1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading
  • Global Health
  • Inequity
  • Primary healthcare

Introduction

Sadly, inequalities in health are ubiquitous.1 Signatories to the 1948 World Health Organization (WHO) constitution committed to promoting ‘health for all’ and this foundational global health principle resonates through the Alma-Ata and Astana Declarations.2–4 Universal Health Coverage (UHC) — the contemporary manifestation of health for all — is inextricably linked to primary care, as the delivery of at least ten of the 14 ‘tracer’ services being used to monitor UHC progress are critically dependent on well-functioning primary care services.5 Primary care services also lie at the centre of the broader philosophical approach of Primary Health Care (PHC), which is underpinned by effective multi-sectoral policy, community engagement, and well-integrated, high quality public health and primary care services.3,4 As such, efforts to achieve UHC, deliver PHC, and address health inequities worldwide are fundamentally grounded in the quality and reach of primary care services.6

The term ‘primary care’ is often applied broadly and at cross-purposes. It is commonly defined as a model of care that supports five core functions; first-contact, accessible, continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated person-focused health care (Table 1).7–10

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Core functions of high quality primary care8,10

While recent years have witnessed a renewed global focus on primary care, variability in access and quality continues to be a major driver of inequity in health and access to health care worldwide.5,11,12 Many of these inequities arise from the social conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age and how these affect their ability to access health care.1 Work by WHO, the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative, and the Exemplars in Global Health collaborators has produced guidance and frameworks, as well as highlighting good practice to support improved access to high quality primary care.10,13–17 However, much remains unknown about the factors underlying successful reforms aimed at addressing health inequities: for instance, which aspects of primary care reform deliver the most cost-effective improvements in health and equity, in what settings, and under what circumstances? These implementation science and health systems research questions are not receiving the attention they deserve in many countries given that extending access to high quality primary care is the cornerstone of UHC.18 To begin to address these research questions it is important to examine the different dimensions under which inequities in access to high quality primary care exist.

Dimensions of disparities in access to high quality primary care

Inequitable access to high quality primary care can be considered across three dimensions: (1) disparities between countries; (2) disparities within countries; and (3) disparities across socioeconomic gradients. While presented separately here, these dimensions may intersect with one another, particularly within countries with fragmented health systems.

Disparities between countries

While virtually every country is currently experiencing a shortfall in primary care staff, workforce gaps are not equally shared, with those living in low- and middle-income countries being the least likely to have access to primary care teams and clinicians trained in family medicine.19,20 International workforce disparities are compounded by ‘brain drain’, with higher income countries recruiting staff from lower income countries.21,22 In settings where there is limited access to primary care, no patient registration, and no routine use of electronic medical records, access to continuity of care is often a luxury.23–26 Even in settings where primary care provides the first point of contact, primary care providers may not have the ability to coordinate care across the entire health system, hold responsibility for a person’s care beyond each discrete interaction, or maintain a complete record of each person’s medications and clinical encounters.

There are a number of examples of low- and middle-income countries that have developed high quality primary care systems and introduced effective reforms for at least parts of their populations, including Brazil, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Ghana, Peru, Sri Lanka, Rwanda, and Thailand.13,14 However, many of the world’s best performing care systems are found in higher income country settings, which have the lowest burdens of disease, thus compounding international health inequities.27

Disparities within countries

Inequity in access to high quality primary care is also manifest within countries through the unequal geographic distribution of primary care facilities and, specifically, the lack of access to qualified primary care providers in many rural areas. Healthcare services tend to be disproportionately located around affluent and well-developed communities while rural, low-income, and socially marginalised communities are often underserved.28–31 The reasons for these disparities are complex, but human resources, market forces, and workforce incentives are often central.1,32 Encouraging health and care workers to live and practice in the poorest and most remote areas can also be a major challenge.33

Disparities across socioeconomic gradients

The third dimension is socioeconomic. Irrespective of clinic location or quality, the most disadvantaged individuals in the catchment area tend to face the highest barriers to accessing high quality care.1 Again, the issues governing access to high quality care are complex and include a wide range of supply- and demand-side factors, such as approachability, acceptability, affordability, health literacy and values, transport and mobility issues, and structural discrimination.34 While access to healthcare services should be driven by need, the reality is that provision of care is often driven by ability to pay in many countries.35

What can be done?

Unless action is taken to improve national primary care systems, the distribution of high quality services within countries, and equitable access to care within each community, there is no chance of ensuring health for all by 2030. Each of these three dimensions is multifaceted and each country’s route to equitable, accessible, and high-quality primary care will be unique.36 Here we briefly highlight five important and interlinked supporting elements from the WHO Primary Health Care Measurement Framework: governance and regulation; training and continuous professional development; systems to promote continuity of care; gatekeeping and referral pathways; and funding and payment mechanisms.

Governance and regulation

Most health systems have evolved into agglomerations of public, private, and non-profit providers, often delivering overlapping services at variable cost and quality. Governments have a key role to play in regulating the quality of primary care delivered by all provider types.37 This requires the establishment of standards and regulatory bodies that can oversee performance with independence and competence. Governance arrangements are also needed to identify priorities for reform — in collaboration with key stakeholders, including primary care providers and users of health services — and subsequently promoted and monitored.38 This can be used to stimulate multi-sectoral engagement to plan and deliver services to address the wider determinants of health in partnership with primary care.

Training and continuous professional development

Specialist training in primary care for community health workers, nurses, doctors, and allied primary care professionals is foundational for the provision of high quality primary care. This includes the training of new professionals and the continuous professional development of existing professionals.19 Currently, most of the world’s primary care doctors lack regulated specialist postgraduate training in family medicine and requirements for structured continuous professional development.39 Their training should equip them to work within multidisciplinary teams with clear accountability to collectively manage most of their local community’s health needs, from health promotion to end-of-life care.20

Systems to promote continuity of care

Empanelment and health records are mechanisms that can enable relational, informational and managerial continuity of care, as well as supporting practice management, resource allocation, and health system planning.24,26,40,41 Empanelment is 'a continuous, iterative set of processes that identify and assign populations to facilities, care teams, or providers who have a responsibility to know their assigned population and to proactively deliver coordinated primary health care towards achieving universal health coverage'. 42 Empanelment involves identifying the target population, creating a population list with identifiable characteristics (such as name, date of birth, and gender), assigning the individuals to a provider, ensuring both parties are aware of their mutual association, and reviewing the assigned lists regularly. Empanelment enables primary care teams to plan and deliver appropriate care for their population, while facilitating continuity of care, ownership over coordinating care, and a shift from reactive to proactive health care.43 Multiple mechanisms to improve empanelment are needed to produce a lasting impact, such as financial incentives for both primary care providers and patients and policies that allow primary care services to be adapted to local needs,26 while highlighting to both parties how it contributes to continuity of care. Likewise, investment and incentives may be required to support the introduction of health records to facilitate information collection and sharing with the patient, within the primary care team, and with other health providers.

Gatekeeping and referral pathways

Systems that enable and standardise communication between primary care and other areas of the health system, referrals pathways, and counter-referrals (that is, referrals and communications back to primary care) are required as the building blocks of care coordination.44 First-contact or ‘gatekeeper’ reforms to channel access to secondary care through primary care are important, but will not be accepted by the public without trust, which must be earned by consistently demonstrating the delivery of competent, safe, and high quality care.44 Gatekeeping is associated with lower patient satisfaction, as it restricts choice, but with better quality of care, lower healthcare use, and lower healthcare expenditure.45 Clear referral pathways help to standardise care for patients with similar conditions, and counter-referral letters help to promote management continuity and primary care coordination.23

Funding and payment mechanisms

Currently, around 5–10% of national health spending goes towards primary care in many countries; vastly less than the proportion of total health care that primary care is expected to deliver.46,47 Expenditure on primary care must be monitored to ensure investments in high value and cost-effective aspects of primary care are prioritised, many of which can reduce secondary care costs.48 Adequate facilities, supplies, and support staff are essential for multidisciplinary primary care teams to operate effectively and efficiently. Blended payment mechanisms, including consideration of inclusion of capitation and pay-for-performance measures, can support greater delivery of health promotion, disease prevention, chronic disease management and community-focused care.46,49 Such payment mechanisms may require other systems, such as empanelment, to be in place to both model costings and organise payments.40,43,50

Finally, countries seeking to address health inequalities should identify and respond to the needs of communities that face the highest levels of marginalisation and socioeconomic deprivation.51 Financial and other incentives can be used to achieve a balanced distribution of health workers.33,52 Public services need to reach everyone irrespective of their ability to pay.53 In many countries, to ensure equitable access to care, insurance schemes and national health financing systems may need to meet all costs associated with accessing primary care.

Conclusion: The neglected bedrock of global health equity

In this analysis we have outlined how inequities in health and access to healthcare play out internationally, nationally, and across socioeconomic groups. We present a selection of reforms that can potentially promote the availability of high quality primary care. There is an urgent need for well-funded, scientifically rigorous research into the planning, implementation, and evaluation of primary care reforms in each country, as every context is different.

Most health care is accessed — well or poorly — in community settings by services described as primary care. The differential quality, distribution, and accessibility of these services is an important driver of national and international health inequities. Ensuring primary care can provide first-contact, comprehensive, continuous, coordinated, people-centred, and community-based care is imperative. National governance, workforce, financing, and planning reforms are central to strengthening and rationalising the weak, fragmented, and often ineffective primary care services that currently serve much of the world’s population. All countries — even high-income countries with mature primary care systems —have work to do.

Notes

Funding

There was no specific funding for this article. Dr Luisa M Pettigrew is a NIHR Doctoral Research Fellow. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or Department of Health and Care.

Ethical approval

N/A

Authors’ contributions

Dr Luke N Allen, Dr Luisa M Pettigrew, Dr Josephine Exley, Dr Harry Collin, Dr Shona Bates, and Prof Michael Kidd contributed to the writing and reviewing of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data

N/A

Competing interests

Dr Luke N Allen, Dr Luisa M Pettigrew, and Dr Josephine Exley co-leadthe London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Primary Health Care Group. Dr Luke N Allen and Dr Luisa M Pettigrew are family doctors, Dr Harry Collin is a family medicine trainee. Dr Luke Allen and Prof Michael Kidd co-lead Oxford’s Global Primary Care group.

  • Received August 7, 2024.
  • Accepted November 13, 2024.
  • Copyright © 2024, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. WHO
    (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Commission on Social Determinants of Health (World Health Organization, Geneva).
  2. 2.↵
    1. WHO
    (1948) Constitution of the world health organization (World Health Organization, Geneva).
  3. 3.↵
    1. WHO
    (1978) Report Of the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6-12 September 1978 (World Health Organization, Geneva) Available from. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/declaration-of-alma-ata.
  4. 4.↵
    1. WHO
    (2019) Global Conference on Primary Health Care: Astana, Kazakhstan, 25 and 26 october 2018 (World Health Organization, Geneva) Available from. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/328123/WHO-HIS-SDS-2018.61-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  5. 5.↵
    1. WHO
    (2023) UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 381). accessed. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/uhc-index-of-service-coverage. 27 Nov 2024.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Allen LN,
    2. Pettigrew LM,
    3. Exley J,
    4. Nugent R,
    5. et al.
    (2023) The role of primary health care, primary care and hospitals in advancing universal health coverage. BMJ Glob Health 8 (12), doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014442, pmid:38084496. e014442.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kringos D,
    2. Boerma W,
    3. Bourgueil Y,
    4. Cartier T,
    5. et al.
    (2013) The strength of primary care in europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Pract 63 (616):e742–50, doi:10.3399/bjgp13X674422, pmid:24267857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.
    1. Starfield B,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Macinko J
    (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 83 (3):457–502, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x, pmid:16202000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. WHO
    (2018) Quality in primary health care (World Health Organization, Geneva).
  10. 10.↵
    1. WHO,
    2. UNICEF
    (2020) Operational framework for primary health care: transforming vision into action (World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund, Geneva).
  11. 11.↵
    1. WHO
    (2023) Investing in global health: a common objective. accessed. https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/investing-in-global-health--a-common-objective. 27 Nov 2024.
  12. 12.↵
    1. WHO,
    2. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank
    (2023) Tracking universal health coverage: 2023 global monitoring report (World Health Organization, Geneva).
  13. 13.↵
    1. Exemplars in Global Health
    (2021) Primary Health Care. accessed. https://www.exemplars.health/topics/primary-health-care. 27 Nov 2024.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
    (2023) Primary health care systems, accessed. https://ahpsr.who.int/what-we-do/thematic-areas-of-focus/primary-health-care/primary-health-care-systems-primasys. 27 Nov 2024.
  15. 15.
    1. WHO
    (2019) Progressing primary health care: a series of country case studies (World Health Organization, Geneva).
  16. 16.
    1. Veillard J,
    2. Cowling K,
    3. Bitton A,
    4. Ratcliffe H,
    5. et al.
    (2017) Better measurement for performance improvement in low- and middle-income countries: the primary health care performance initiative (PHCPI) experience of conceptual framework development and indicator selection. Milbank Q 95 (4):836–883, doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12301, pmid:29226448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Siddiqi S,
    2. Mataria A,
    3. Rouleau K,
    4. et al.
    1. Barkley S,
    2. Allen L,
    3. Brown L,
    4. Kaara C,
    5. et al.
    (2022) in Making Health Systems Work in Low and Middle Income Countries: Textbook for Public Health Practitioners, eds Siddiqi S, Mataria A, Rouleau K, et al. (Cambridge University Press), In, pp 20–33, doi:10.1017/9781009211086.003. Health systems based on primary health care.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Binagwaho A,
    2. Adhanom Ghebreyesus T
    (2019) Primary healthcare is cornerstone of universal health coverage. BMJ 365 doi:10.1136/bmj.l2391, pmid:31160322. l2391.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dussault G,
    2. Kawar R,
    3. Castro Lopes S,
    4. Campbell J
    (2018) Building the primary health care workforce of the 21st century - background paper to the global conference on primary health care: from alma-ata towards universal health coverage and the sustainable development goals (World Health Organization, Geneva).
  20. 20.↵
    1. WHO,
    2. UNICEF
    (2018) A vision for primary health care in the 21st century: towards universal health coverage and the sustainable development goals (World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund, Geneva).
  21. 21.↵
    1. Boniol M,
    2. Kunjumen T,
    3. Nair TS,
    4. Siyam A,
    5. et al.
    (2022) The global health workforce stock and distribution in 2020 and 2030: a threat to equity and “universal” health coverage? BMJ Glob Health 7 (6), doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009316, pmid:35760437. e009316.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mills EJ,
    2. Kanters S,
    3. Hagopian A,
    4. Bansback N,
    5. et al.
    (2011) The financial cost of doctors emigrating from sub-saharan africa: human capital analysis. BMJ 343 doi:10.1136/bmj.d7031, pmid:22117056. d7031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rajan D,
    2. Rouleau K,
    3. Winkelmann J,
    4. et al.
    1. Allen LN,
    2. Plummer M,
    3. Gupta A,
    4. Venema M,
    5. et al.
    (2024) in Implementing the Primary Health Care Approach: a Primer, eds Rajan D, Rouleau K, Winkelmann J, et al. (World Health Organization, Geneva) In, pp 127–146. PHC-orientated Models of Care.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Guthrie B,
    2. Saultz JW,
    3. Freeman GK,
    4. Haggerty JL
    (2008) Continuity of care matters. BMJ 337 doi:10.1136/bmj.a867, pmid:18687724. 337/aug07_1/a867.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.
    1. Marchildon GP,
    2. Brammli-Greenberg S,
    3. Dayan M,
    4. De Belvis AG,
    5. et al.
    (2021) Achieving higher performing primary care through patient registration: A review of twelve high-income countries. Health Policy 125 (12):1507–1516, doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.09.001, pmid:34531039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nabieva K,
    2. McCutcheon T,
    3. Liddy C
    (2023) Connecting unattached patients to comprehensive primary care: a rapid review. Prim Health Care Res Dev 24 doi:10.1017/S1463423623000099, pmid:36919838. e19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schneider E,
    2. Shah A,
    3. Doty M,
    4. Tikkanen R,
    5. et al.
    (2021) Mirror, mirror 2021: Reflecting poorly. Health care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries (The Commonwealth Fund).
  28. 28.↵
    1. Elyazar I,
    2. Fullman N,
    3. Gayawan E,
    4. Macharia P
    (2023) Collection: geospatial analysis for improved understanding of health inequalities. Commun Med 4 .
  29. 29.
    1. Grobler L,
    2. Marais BJ,
    3. Mabunda SA,
    4. Marindi PN,
    5. et al.
    (2009) Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 (1), doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005314.pub2, pmid:19160251. CD005314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.
    1. Mohammadiaghdam N,
    2. Doshmangir L,
    3. Babaie J,
    4. Khabiri R,
    5. et al.
    (2020) Determining factors in the retention of physicians in rural and underdeveloped areas: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 21 (1), doi:10.1186/s12875-020-01279-7, pmid:33097002. 216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Nasiripour AA,
    2. Maleki MR,
    3. Tabibi SJ,
    4. Chimeh EE
    (2013) Factors influence on geographic distribution of physicians in selected countries: A review article. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 17 (9). e74346.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hart JT
    (1971) The inverse care law. Lancet 1 (7696):405–412, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x, pmid:4100731.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Russell D,
    2. Mathew S,
    3. Fitts M,
    4. Liddle Z,
    5. et al.
    (2021) Interventions for health workforce retention in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health 19 (1), doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7, pmid:34446042. 103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Cu A,
    2. Meister S,
    3. Lefebvre B,
    4. Ridde V
    (2021) Assessing healthcare access using the levesque’s conceptual framework- a scoping review. Int J Equity Health 20 (1), doi:10.1186/s12939-021-01416-3, pmid:33962627. 116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. WHO
    (2017) World Bank and WHO: Half the world lacks access to essential health services, 100 million still pushed into extreme poverty because of health expenses, accessed. https://www.who.int/news/item/13-12-2017-world-bank-and-who-half-the-world-lacks-access-to-essential-health-services-100-million-still-pushed-into-extreme-poverty-because-of-health-expenses#:~:text=of%20health%20expenses-,World%20Bank%20and%20WHO%3A%20Half%20the%20world%20lacks%20access%20to,poverty%20because%20of%20health%20expenses&text=At%20least%20half%20of%20the,the%20World%20Bank%20and%20WHO. 27 Nov 2024.
  36. 36.↵
    1. WHO,
    2. UNICEF
    (2022) Primary health care measurement framework and indicators: monitoring health systems through a primary health care lens (World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Geneva).
  37. 37.↵
    1. Rajan D,
    2. Rouleau K,
    3. Winkelmann J,
    4. et al.
    1. Kadandale S,
    2. Gupta P,
    3. Siddiqi S,
    4. Rohrer-Herold K,
    5. et al.
    (2024) in Implementing the Primary Health Care Approach: a Primer, eds Rajan D, Rouleau K, Winkelmann J, et al. (World Health Organization, Geneva) In, pp 157–177. Health Governance.
  38. 38.↵
    1. Aggarwal M,
    2. Hutchison B,
    3. Abdelhalim R,
    4. Baker GR
    (2023) Building high-performing primary care systems: after a decade of policy change, is Canada “walking the talk?” Milbank Q 101 (4):1139–1190, doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12674, pmid:37743824.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. von Pressentin KB,
    2. Besigye I,
    3. Mash R,
    4. Malan Z
    (2020) The state of family medicine training programmes within the primary care and family medicine education network. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine 12 (1), doi:10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2588.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Ghorob A,
    3. Willard-Grace R,
    4. Grumbach K
    (2014) The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med 12 (2):166–171, doi:10.1370/afm.1616, pmid:24615313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Harris MF,
    2. Rhee J
    (2022) Achieving continuity of care in general practice: the impact of patient enrolment on health outcomes. Med J Aust 216 (9):460–461, doi:10.5694/mja2.51508, pmid:35443290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Joint Learning Network
    (2019) Empanelment: A foundational component of primary health care, accessed. https://jointlearningnetwork.org/resources/empanelment-a-foundational-component-of-primary-health-care/. 28 Nov 2024.
  43. 43.↵
    1. Bearden T,
    2. Ratcliffe HL,
    3. Sugarman JR,
    4. Bitton A,
    5. et al.
    (2019) Empanelment: A foundational component of primary health care. Gates Open Res 3 1654, doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.13059.1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. OECD/EU
    (2016) Health at a Glance: Europe 2016 – state of health in the EU cycle (OECD Publishing, Paris) In, pp 37–52, doi:10.1787/health_glance_eur-2016-5-en. Chapter 2 Strengthening primary care systems.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Sripa P,
    2. Hayhoe B,
    3. Garg P,
    4. Majeed A,
    5. et al.
    (2019) Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 69 (682):e294–e303, doi:10.3399/bjgp19X702209, pmid:30910875.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Hanson K,
    2. Brikci N,
    3. Erlangga D,
    4. Alebachew A,
    5. et al.
    (2022) The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre. Lancet Glob Health 10 (5):e715–e772, doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00005-5, pmid:35390342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. WHO
    Webpage "Global Health Expenditure Database, accessed. https://apps.who.int/nha/database. 6 Aug 2024.
  48. 48.↵
    1. Baillieu R,
    2. Kidd M,
    3. Phillips R,
    4. Roland M,
    5. et al.
    (2019) The primary care spend model: a systems approach to measuring investment in primary care. BMJ Glob Health 4 (4), doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001601, pmid:31354975. e001601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Rajan D,
    2. Rouleau K,
    3. Winkelmann J,
    4. et al.
    1. Hanson K,
    2. Venema M,
    3. Habicht T,
    4. Ginneken E,
    5. et al.
    (2024) in Implementing the Primary Health Care approach: a primer, eds Rajan D, Rouleau K, Winkelmann J, et al. (World Health Organization, Geneva) In, pp 219–246. Health financing.
  50. 50.↵
    1. Grumbach K,
    2. Olayiwola JN
    (2015) Patient empanelment: the importance of understanding who is at home in the medical home. J Am Board Fam Med 28 (2):170–172, doi:10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.150011, pmid:25748755.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Allen LN,
    2. Nkomazana O,
    3. Mishra SK,
    4. Gichangi M,
    5. et al.
    (2023) Improvement studies for equitable and evidence-based innovation: an overview of the “IM-SEEN” model. Int J Equity Health 22 (1), doi:10.1186/s12939-023-01915-5, pmid:37330480. 116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Ajuebor O,
    2. Boniol M,
    3. McIsaac M,
    4. Onyedike C,
    5. et al.
    (2020) Increasing access to health workers in rural and remote areas: what do stakeholders’ value and find feasible and acceptable? Hum Resour Health 18 (1), doi:10.1186/s12960-020-00519-2, pmid:33066792. 77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Allen LN
    (2022) The philosophical foundations of “health for all” and universal health coverage. Int J Equity Health 21 (1), doi:10.1186/s12939-022-01780-8, pmid:36335332. 155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 8, Issue 4
December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global health inequity and primary care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Global health inequity and primary care
Luke N Allen, Luisa M Pettigrew, Josephine Exley, Harry Collin, Shona Bates, Michael Kidd
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (4): BJGPO.2024.0189. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0189

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Global health inequity and primary care
Luke N Allen, Luisa M Pettigrew, Josephine Exley, Harry Collin, Shona Bates, Michael Kidd
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (4): BJGPO.2024.0189. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0189
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Global Health
  • Inequity
  • primary healthcare

More in this TOC Section

  • The BJGP Open Top 10 Most Read Research Articles of 2024: an editorial
  • The overlooked challenges facing out-of-hours primary care in the NHS: a missed opportunity in policy
  • Potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a significant problem with a lack of action and evidence to address it
Show more Practice & Policy

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795