Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Evaluating whether Prostate Cancer UK’s risk checker is a help or hindrance to prostate-specific antigen testing policy: a mixed-methods study

Natalia Norori, Chiara de Biase, Yui Hang Wong, Sadie Robson Crabtree, Matt Cox, Esther Appleby, Andrew Seggie, Rachel Brown and Amy Rylance
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (2): BJGPO.2024.0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0040
Natalia Norori
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natalia Norori
  • For correspondence: Natalia.Norori@prostatecanceruk.org
Chiara de Biase
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yui Hang Wong
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sadie Robson Crabtree
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matt Cox
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esther Appleby
2 Southeast London Cancer Alliance, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Seggie
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Brown
3 Bristol Inner City Primary Care Network and Montpelier Health Centre, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Rylance
1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 8 no. 2 BJGPO.2024.0040
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0040
PubMed 
38423621

Published By 
Royal College of General Practitioners
History 
  • Received February 8, 2024
  • Revision received February 23, 2024
  • Accepted February 23, 2024
  • Published online July 29, 2024.

Article Versions

  • Previous version (February 29, 2024 - 04:20).
  • Previous version (June 26, 2024 - 00:19).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2024, The Authors This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Author Information

  1. Natalia Norori1,*,
  2. Chiara de Biase1,
  3. Yui Hang Wong1,
  4. Sadie Robson Crabtree1,
  5. Matt Cox1,
  6. Esther Appleby2,
  7. Andrew Seggie1,
  8. Rachel Brown3 and
  9. Amy Rylance1
  1. 1 Prostate Cancer UK, London, UK
  2. 2 Southeast London Cancer Alliance, London, UK
  3. 3 Bristol Inner City Primary Care Network and Montpelier Health Centre, Bristol, UK
  1. ↵ *For correspondence:
    Natalia Norori, Natalia.Norori{at}prostatecanceruk.org
View Full Text

Article usage

Article usage: February 2024 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Feb 20241808
Mar 20242620141
Apr 2024209076
May 202462045
Jun 202472259264
Jul 202476676387
Aug 202421513170
Sep 202411351151
Oct 202418336139
Nov 2024725071
Dec 2024518458
Jan 20252112426
Feb 2025717554
Mar 20251514841
Apr 20251018771

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 8, Issue 2
July 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating whether Prostate Cancer UK’s risk checker is a help or hindrance to prostate-specific antigen testing policy: a mixed-methods study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluating whether Prostate Cancer UK’s risk checker is a help or hindrance to prostate-specific antigen testing policy: a mixed-methods study
Natalia Norori, Chiara de Biase, Yui Hang Wong, Sadie Robson Crabtree, Matt Cox, Esther Appleby, Andrew Seggie, Rachel Brown, Amy Rylance
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (2): BJGPO.2024.0040. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0040

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluating whether Prostate Cancer UK’s risk checker is a help or hindrance to prostate-specific antigen testing policy: a mixed-methods study
Natalia Norori, Chiara de Biase, Yui Hang Wong, Sadie Robson Crabtree, Matt Cox, Esther Appleby, Andrew Seggie, Rachel Brown, Amy Rylance
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (2): BJGPO.2024.0040. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0040
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • prostatic neoplasms
  • prostate-specific antigen
  • informed choice
  • male

More in this TOC Section

  • Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and treatment intensity in secondary prevention of patients with ischaemic heart disease in the primary care setting: a real-world data registry study
  • “We’re all in the same boat… some of us just have more holes in their boat”: a qualitative interview study primary care staff views of Deep End Cymru
  • General practitioner characteristics and video use in out-of-hours primary care: a register-based study
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795