Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open
  • RCGP
    • British Journal of General Practice
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow BJGP Open on Instagram
  • Visit bjgp open on Bluesky
  • Blog
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
BJGP Open

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • LATEST ARTICLES
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP Open
    • BJGP Open Accessibility Statement
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Fellowships
    • Audio Abstracts
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • BJGP Life
    • Research into Publication Science
    • Advertising
    • Contact
  • SPECIAL ISSUES
    • Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: call for articles
    • Social Care Integration with Primary Care: call for articles
    • Special issue: Telehealth
    • Special issue: Race and Racism in Primary Care
    • Special issue: COVID-19 and Primary Care
    • Past research calls
    • Top 10 Research Articles of the Year
  • BJGP CONFERENCE →
Research

Women’s information needs about menopause: a cross-sectional survey in Norwegian general practice

Marianne Natvik, Bjorn Gjelsvik, Siri Vangen, Holgeir Skjeie and Mette Brekke
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (1): BJGPO.2023.0127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0127
Marianne Natvik
1 Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marianne Natvik
  • For correspondence: marianne{at}natvik.nu
Bjorn Gjelsvik
1 Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siri Vangen
2 Norwegian Research Centre for Women’s Health, Oslo University Hospital & Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holgeir Skjeie
3 General Practice Research Unit, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mette Brekke
3 General Practice Research Unit, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Research has indicated that providing women with information about menopause can improve their attitudes towards it and symptom experience. Nevertheless, information shared on the menopause is often arbitrary.

Aim To examine women’s information needs about menopause, and understand if, when, and from whom they want information.

Design & setting A cross-sectional study was undertaken. A questionnaire survey was distributed to women in the waiting room of 54 general practice clinics in South-Eastern Norway in autumn 2022.

Method Medical students recruited women in the clinic waiting rooms. A 1-page study-specific questionnaire was used, focusing on need for information about menopause. A multinominal logistic regression model was used to analyse the association between the desire for information and education level, country of birth, and menopausal status.

Results A total of 625 women were included, with a mean age of 44.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.7). In all, 59% answered that they wanted information about menopause, and 81% of these wanted their GP to inform them, from a median age of 45 years. According to the women, only 10% of GPs had initiated a discussion on the menopause. Higher education was a predictor for wanting information. A main driver of information needs was to help oneself in the present and in the future. In all, 33% did not want information. The main reasons were that they already possessed sufficient information, would take menopause as it comes, were too young, or were already postmenopausal. The sex of the GP did not influence the results.

Conclusion Most women wanted information about menopause from their GP. The study emphasises the need for GPs to consider prioritising this discussion, and to keep up to date on recommendations and treatment options.

  • menopause
  • women’s health
  • health education
  • general practice

How this fits in

Menopause is not a disease; however, women may experience symptoms that can leave them feeling uncertain or unwell. Adequate knowledge about menopause can aid women in recognising the symptoms, which can help to equip them to manage it. Previous studies have shown that women want information about the menopause; this research has provided support for these findings. It has shown that about two-thirds of women want such information and consider their GP important in providing it. The participants wanted information before reaching menopause, from aged 45 years.

Introduction

Women experience natural menopause between the ages of 45 and 55 years.1 In high-income countries, they thus live one-third of their life after menopause. Although every woman goes through menopause, it is often a theme that women, doctors, and society tends to avoid discussing. Menopause is not a disease, but the symptoms a woman experiences might make her feel ill, and affect her function and quality of life.2,3 A woman’s experience of menopause is influenced by her symptoms, views, knowledge about this period, and the support she receives if she seeks help.4,5 Lack of knowledge and misleading assumptions about menopause can lead to a sense of uncertainty regarding the experiences a woman goes through.4–6 Prior information about menopause can support women’s attitudes towards it and their symptom experience.4,7 Yet there is no system for distributing such information to all women.5,8 Information about menopause, and the changes in the postmenopausal body, is important to optimise health throughout the rest of a woman’s life.8–10

Society’s focus on menopause is increasing and knowledge is becoming more available, but it is of varying quality and is, at times, confusing to women and even healthcare professionals.5,10–14 As a result, more women may consult their GP for up-to-date information about this topic.11 This requires time in the general practice, and that the GP is updated on the menopausal treatment and advice.8,15 GPs’ attitudes towards menopause as a natural phase in every woman’s life, and their views on the risk associated with menopausal hormone treatment (MHT; hormone replacement therapy [HRT] in the UK), may make GPs reluctant to prescribe MHT.15,16 The view that menopause is a ‘long-term female hormone deficiency’ may lead women to believe that MHT is a ‘wonder drug’.11 These different views may result in conflicting expectations. Time-constricted GPs may feel they spend time talking to healthy women, with insufficient time to talk to other patients,11 and they express that scarcity of time limits a holistic approach to managing menopause.15

Female patients in Norway visit their GP on average 3.6 times yearly.17 The GP is the first contact point for most medical issues and is a gatekeeper to gynaecologists.18,19 For reasons of health economy and resources, GPs should meet women’s needs concerning menopause appropriately.20

Knowledge about how, when, and why women want information about menopause is limited. We need to learn how women in Norway acquire this information and whether they find it helpful, and their expectations regarding the role of GPs in providing information. This study aims to investigate these issues.

Method

Study design, setting, participants, and data collection

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted during autumn in 2022. It was undertaken in the waiting rooms of 54 GP practices in South-Eastern Norway. During deployment in general practice, medical students at the University of Oslo distributed and collected the questionnaires. Fifty-four students participated in our study. The students were offered a reward for the task. The women were not offered compensation for participating in the study.

The questionnaire was a 1-page form on paper. The women answered while waiting for their GP. The students collected the questionnaires and sent or delivered them in a sealed envelope to the Department of General Practice at the University of Oslo. The form was filled out anonymously. In total, 959 women were asked to participate, and 86% (n = 829) accepted. The response rate was calculated from reports made by 44 of the 54 students, who systematically registered the women they asked to participate. The inclusion criteria were women aged between 30–60 years who could read Norwegian. Questionnaires from older or younger responders (n = 184) and questionnaires without the woman’s menopausal status (n = 3) were excluded. Questionnaires completed inconsistently (n = 9) or revealing that the woman had breast cancer or gynaecological diseases (n = 8) were also excluded. In total, 204 questionnaires were excluded. A total of 625 women were included in the analysis.

Contents of the questionnaire

The research group created a study-specific questionnaire, as we could not find a suitable validated alternative. The questionnaire used by Cooper in their research on factors that influence women’s search for information about menopause inspired us.6 The questionnaire was validated through discussions with 18 women in a GP practice to confirm the wording, avoid misunderstandings, and secure the questionnaire flow. It was also discussed with GP colleagues and researchers.

The questionnaire contained three parts, with 23 questions. (See Supplementary data files.)

The first part included background information. The second part was about women’s need for information and if they had searched for information themselves. The third part concerned women’s experiences and preferences for involving the GP in giving information. Most questions included multiple-answer options, some with the opportunity to provide free-text responses. One question was exclusively free text (‘If you have searched for information about menopause, from where did you get it?’).

Statistical analysis

The women’s demographics and the results are presented with mean and standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data, or otherwise median. For categorical variables, frequencies and percentages were calculated. A multinominal logistic regression model was used to analyse the association between the desire for information and education level, country of birth, and menopausal status. The association was presented as a relative risk ratio (RRR) with 95% a confidence interval (CI). Two steps preceded the modelling. First, unadjusted models were fitted to the data. Second, all independent variables with P<0.2 from the unadjusted models were used to fit the adjusted model.

The questionnaires were registered in an online form and transferred to SPSS. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS Statistics (version 29).

Results

Demographics

The characteristics of the responders are summarised in Table 1. Among the 625 women included, 58% defined themselves as premenopausal, 24% were in the menopausal transition, 8% were postmenopausal, and 9% did not know. The participants were born in 43 different countries, the majority in Norway. The country of origin of their mothers showed the same distribution. Sixty-one per cent had higher education (>12 years). Of the participants’ GPs, 46% were female and 53% male (1% did not know their GP’s sex).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1. Characteristics of responders (n = 625)

Information needs and preferences

We found that almost two-thirds of the participants (59%) wanted information about menopause (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1). Among all women, the main reason for information need was ‘I want to know how to help myself’ in this period, as stated by 62% (Table 3). The main reason for information for participants who were premenopausal was ‘I want to prepare myself for the menopausal transition’ (70%), and 40% said they were curious about menopause. Participants in the menopausal transition wanted information because they had symptoms (61%) or wanted to know more about symptoms (45%) or treatment (55%), and 79% wanted information to know how to help themselves.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2. Information need about menopause according to menopausal status, education level, and country of origin. Number, per cent, and relative risk ratio (RRR) are presented
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3. Reasons for wanting or not wanting information about menopause among all women

In all, one-third did not want information (n = 205). The main reasons were that they already possessed enough information, would take menopause as it comes, thought they were too young, or they were already postmenopausal.

Participants with lower education reported a significantly lower need for information than those with higher education (P<0.05). Region of birth showed no influence on information needs.

Among the preferred information sources, the participants ranked the GP (67%), the internet (37%), and the gynaecologist (36%) as the most important (Table 4). When asked if they had already searched for information, almost half said they had, and less than half of these had found the information helpful. The main information sources used are listed in Table 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4. Sources of information about menopause

The role of the GP

In total, 22% had enquired with their GP about menopause, and 10% reported that their GP had initiated the conversation. The information was deemed useful by 57% when self-enquired, whereas 86% found it helpful when the doctor initiated the discussion. When asked why their GP should address menopause, the main reason was 'Information to help myself in this period' (Table 5). Among participants who wanted information, but whose GP had not addressed the topic, four out of five (81%) wanted their GP to do so. The sex of the GP did not influence this preference.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5. Reasons for wanting the GP to address menopause, related to menopausal status among women who want information

Participants were asked from what age they wanted their GP to address menopause; they answered from the median age of 45 years. Several specified that they wanted information before entering menopause and some as part of any consultation. When asked about situations during which the GP could address menopause, the predominant choice was when experiencing symptoms (84%), when coming to the GP for a cervical screening test (33%), or when discussing contraceptives (10%).

Discussion

Summary

This study has shown that nearly two-thirds of the participants desired menopause-related information, and four out of five preferred their GP to be involved. They wanted information before entering menopause, at a median age of 45 years. The GP’s sex did not influence the preference for information from the GP. Higher education increased the probability of wanting information. The main reason for wanting information was to help oneself in this period, and the preferred sources apart from the GP were the internet, friends, and the gynaecologist. One-third of women did not want information.

Strengths and limitations

One strength of this study is the random female population addressed in this general practice setting. The women were in their GP’s waiting room for different reasons. Women aged between 30 and 60 years were asked, and most (86%) wanted to participate. We received fewer questionnaires than expected, as fewer students participated in distributing questionnaires than anticipated. The students reported difficulties in assessing women’s age (30–60 years). Thus, we had to exclude several questionnaires from the analyses. The women answered the questionnaire in their GP’s waiting room. This may have influenced their responses regarding the GP’s role in providing information. The research group created the questionnaire and the validation rested on the first author’s piloting and adjustments before the start of the study. The fact that only nine questionnaires out of 829 were classified as inconsistent suggests that the form was adequate in this context. The questionnaire was in Norwegian only and therefore excluded patients who could not read Norwegian. We included a group of women covering a wide ethnic background, as 100 women of the 625 women included were born outside Norway.

Comparison with existing literature

The results support previous studies’ findings; women expressed need for information about menopause to be prepared and empowered and to improve future health.5,8,21

In our study, four out of five of those who wanted information would like their GP to address menopause, but only 10% reported that their doctors had initiated discussions about menopause with them. Studies have shown that women want and expect more information from their GP5,6,21 and that it is helpful to receive such information.7 Our results are transferable to other countries where the organisation of the healthcare system is similar, in which the GP is the first contact and a gatekeeper.

‘Time needed to treat’ is a concept to be considered when making guidelines22 and appears relevant in this context. We argue, however, that by discussing menopause and providing knowledge before symptoms, the GP can prevent worries and repeated visits later. This is supported by Herbert et al, who encourage clinicians to help women make informed health choices by being proactive in providing comprehensive information.8

Recent studies in the UK have shown that women and their GPs lack education about menopause.5,21 In Norway, Gjelsvik et al studied GPs’ attitudes and advice given to women concerning MHT in 2007.16,23 GPs were generally well-informed, but their opinions on whether menopause should be considered a natural phase or a medicalised issue influenced their approach to MHT.16 Providing information about menopause in general practice can be seen as a medicalisation, as it brings a natural stage of life into the healthcare system. However, it is important to note that medicalisation does not necessarily have to be negative.24 Receiving information from a GP can empower women before entering this life phase. Women described confusion about which symptoms are linked to menopause and what is normal in the middle of life, and they also expressed that they need care and information during this period.25

There is a commercial market for helping women during this period in life. It is argued that medicalisation happens when ‘medicine meets the market’.26 Receiving comprehensive, evidence-based information from their GP can assist women in navigating the overwhelming amount of advice on ageing and menopausal symptom relief prevalent in society. The GP is in a good position to help women, given their knowledge of previous medical history and background.

We found that the woman’s education level was related to her interest in information. This was also a result in a recent study in Iran,14 showing considerably increased interest with higher education.

There is also a need for other reliable information sources besides the GP. In our study, many participants had searched for information already, but less than half found it to be helpful. More than two-thirds had used the internet. Internet as a source of information is discussed in several studies.5,14,21,27 Women expressed confusion because the information is often inconsistent.5 There is a need for better quality websites addressing menopause.5,27 Several responders suggested public health campaigns directed towards women before entering menopause. This is supported by the findings of Munn et al, which suggest that public campaigns could help provide reliable information and stimulate discussion of the topic in society.21

Implications for research and practice

This research has indicated that most women aged 30–60 years want information about menopause, they want to talk to their GP about it, and they want information before entering menopause. GPs need to make space for this conversation in daily practice. The information may include an overview of menopause, symptoms, up-to-date treatment options, and lifestyle recommendations for now and in the future. This might save women and their GPs time by empowering women in this period of life. It is important to note that one-third of the participants did not want information about menopause, which should be respected.

Further studies are needed to provide deeper insight into women’s information needs. Qualitative interviews with menopausal women experiencing distressing symptoms could help in exploring coping strategies, sources of information, and the perceived helpfulness of those sources.

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by The Norwegian Research Fund for General Practice (AMFF). The authors thank the AMFF for funding this study.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway has approved this study (Ref. no. 45752/2022)

Provenance

Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed.

Data

The dataset relied on in this article is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely grateful to all the women who responded to the questionnaire and to the medical students who collected the questionnaires.

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  • Received July 10, 2023.
  • Revision received August 28, 2023.
  • Accepted September 1, 2023.
  • Copyright © 2024, The Authors

This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. 1.↵
    (1996) Research on the Menopause in the 1990s. report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 866 1–107, pmid:8942292.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gjelsvik B,
    2. Rosvold EO,
    3. Straand J,
    4. et al.
    (2011) Symptom prevalence during menopause and factors associated with symptoms and menopausal age. Results from the Norwegian Hordaland Women’s Cohort study. Maturitas 70 (4):383–390, doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.09.011, pmid:22033103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Whiteley J,
    2. DiBonaventura M,
    3. Wagner J-S,
    4. et al.
    (2013) The impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life, productivity, and economic outcomes. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 22 (11):983–990, doi:10.1089/jwh.2012.3719, pmid:24083674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Buchanan MC,
    2. Villagran MM,
    3. Ragan SL
    (2002) Women, menopause, and (ms.)information: communication about the climacteric. Health Commun 14 (1):99–119, doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1401_5, pmid:11853211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Harper JC,
    2. Phillips S,
    3. Biswakarma R,
    4. et al.
    (2022) An online survey of perimenopausal women to determine their attitudes and knowledge of the menopause. Womens Health (Lond) 18 doi:10.1177/17455057221106890, pmid:35758176. 17455057221106890.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cooper J
    (2018) Examining factors that influence a woman's search for information about menopause using the socio-ecological model of health promotion. Maturitas 116 73–78, doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.07.013, pmid:30244782. S0378-5122(18)30102-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Koyuncu T,
    2. Unsal A,
    3. Arslantas D
    (2018) Evaluation of the effectiveness of health education on menopause symptoms and knowledge and attitude in terms of menopause. J Epidemiol Glob Health 8 (1–2):8–12, doi:10.2991/j.jegh.2018.08.103, pmid:30859781.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Herbert D,
    2. Bell RJ,
    3. Young K,
    4. et al.
    (2020) Australian women's understanding of menopause and its consequences: a qualitative study. Climacteric 23 (6):622–628, doi:10.1080/13697137.2020.1791072, pmid:32705886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. The Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology
    (2022) Menopause: a turning point for women's health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10 (6):373, doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00142-5, pmid:35526555. S2213-8587(22)00142-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Donati S,
    2. Satolli R,
    3. Colombo C,
    4. et al.
    (2013) Informing women on menopause and hormone therapy: know the menopause a multidisciplinary project involving local healthcare system. PLoS One 8 (12), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085121, pmid:24391988. e85121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Howard S
    (2022) GPs caught in media menopause spotlight. BMJ 379 o2841, doi:10.1136/bmj.o2841, pmid:36450399.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.
    1. Schaedel Z,
    2. Rymer J
    (2022) Menopause care and over the counter vaginal oestradiol. Lancet 399 (10343):2250–2252, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00952-7, pmid:35658978. S0140-6736(22)00952-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. The Lancet
    (2022) Attitudes towards menopause: time for change. Lancet 399 (10343), doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01099-6, pmid:35717972. 2243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hajesmaeel-Gohari S,
    2. Shafiei E,
    3. Bahaadinbeigy K
    (2021) A study on women's health information needs in menopausal age. BMC Womens Health 21 (1), doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01582-0, pmid:34961491. 434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Davis SR,
    2. Herbert D,
    3. Reading M,
    4. Bell RJ
    (2021) Health-care providers' views of menopause and its management: a qualitative study. Climacteric 24 (6):612–617, doi:10.1080/13697137.2021.1936486, pmid:34240683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gjelsvik B
    (2008) [General practitioners' advice on hormone replacement therapy in menopause] [Article in Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 128 (15):1660–1663, pmid:18704132.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Statistics Norway
    (2023) GPs and emergency primary health care, accessed. https://www.ssb.no/en/helse/helsetjenester/statistikk/allmennlegetjenesten. 23 Oct 2023.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Eide TB,
    2. Straand J,
    3. Björkelund C,
    4. et al.
    (2017) Differences in medical services in Nordic general practice: a comparative survey from the QUALICOPC study. Scand J Prim Health Care 35 (2):153–161, doi:10.1080/02813432.2017.1358856, pmid:28768442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Eide TB,
    2. Straand J,
    3. Rosvold EO
    (2018) Patients' and GPs' expectations regarding healthcare-seeking behaviour: a Norwegian comparative study. BJGP Open 2 (4), doi:10.3399/bjgpopen18X101615, pmid:30723801. bjgpopen18X101615.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Starfield B,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Macinko J
    (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 83 (3):457–502, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x, pmid:16202000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Munn C,
    2. Vaughan L,
    3. Talaulikar V,
    4. et al.
    (2022) Menopause knowledge and education in women under 40: results from an online survey. Womens Health (Lond) 18 doi:10.1177/17455057221139660, pmid:36533635. 17455057221139660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Johansson M,
    2. Guyatt G,
    3. Montori V
    (2023) Guidelines should consider clinicians' time needed to treat. BMJ 380 doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-072953, pmid:36596571. e072953.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gjelsvik B,
    2. Swensen E,
    3. Hjortdahl P
    (2007) [The general practitioner's view on hormone replacement therapy during and after menopause] [Article in Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 127 (11):1500–1503, pmid:17551553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Frich JC,
    2. Fugelli P
    (2006) [Conceptions of disease—expectations of health] [Article in Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 126 (1):45–48, pmid:16397655.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Duffy O,
    2. Iversen L,
    3. Hannaford PC
    (2011) The menopause 'it's somewhere between a taboo and a joke'. A focus group study. Climacteric 14 (4):497–505, doi:10.3109/13697137.2010.549974, pmid:21395452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Howard S
    (2021) Experimental treatments risk further medicalisation of menopause. BMJ 373 n992, doi:10.1136/bmj.n992, pmid:33975866.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Aleksova J,
    2. Kuczynska-Burggraf M,
    3. Ranasinha S,
    4. Vincent A
    (2017) Information on early menopause: is the internet the place to search? Climacteric 20 (3):248–255, doi:10.1080/13697137.2017.1301920, pmid:28333562.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

BJGP Open
Vol. 8, Issue 1
April 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending BJGP Open.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Women’s information needs about menopause: a cross-sectional survey in Norwegian general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from BJGP Open
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from BJGP Open.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Women’s information needs about menopause: a cross-sectional survey in Norwegian general practice
Marianne Natvik, Bjorn Gjelsvik, Siri Vangen, Holgeir Skjeie, Mette Brekke
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (1): BJGPO.2023.0127. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0127

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Women’s information needs about menopause: a cross-sectional survey in Norwegian general practice
Marianne Natvik, Bjorn Gjelsvik, Siri Vangen, Holgeir Skjeie, Mette Brekke
BJGP Open 2024; 8 (1): BJGPO.2023.0127. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0127
del.icio.us logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo Bluesky logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • How this fits in
    • Introduction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • menopause
  • women’s health
  • health education
  • general practice

More in this TOC Section

  • Depictions of the GP crisis: thematic analysis of UK newspapers pre-general election
  • Continuing professional development on planetary health for African family physicians: descriptive survey
  • What does "housebound" mean? Mixed methods study to develop a consensus definition
Show more Research

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Latest articles
  • Authors & reviewers
  • Accessibility statement

RCGP

  • British Journal of General Practice
  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP Open
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP Open: research
  • Writing for BJGP Open: practice & policy
  • BJGP Open editorial process & policies
  • BJGP Open ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP Open

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Open access licence

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Open Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: bjgpopen@rcgp.org.uk

BJGP Open is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners

© 2025 BJGP Open

Online ISSN: 2398-3795